Cited by 1,867Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility

Rifai, Nader, Gillette, Michael A, Carr, Steven A·2006·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Better biomarkers are urgently needed to improve diagnosis, guide molecularly targeted therapy and monitor activity and therapeutic response across a wide spectrum of disease. Proteomics methods based on mass spectrometry hold special promise for the discovery of novel biomarkers that might form the foundation for new clinical blood tests, but to date their contribution to the diagnostic armamentarium has been disappointing. This is due in part to the lack of a coherent pipeline connecting marker discovery with well-established methods for validation. Advances in methods and technology now enable construction of a comprehensive biomarker pipeline from six essential process components: candidate discovery, qualification, verification, research assay optimization, biomarker validation and commercialization. Better understanding of the overall process of biomarker discovery and validation and of the challenges and strategies inherent in each phase should improve experimental study design, in turn increasing the efficiency of biomarker development and facilitating the delivery and deployment of novel clinical tests.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt1235

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Entertainment Industry Foundation, Women's Cancer Research Fund Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery Project. http://www.eifoundation.org/national/wcrf/press/article2005-10-04.html .
  2. International Standards Organization, I.O.F.S. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results (ISO 5725)-Part 1: General Principles and Definitions (ISO, Geneva, 1994).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,867

Metadata

Authors
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Carr, Steven A
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2006-08
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
971-983
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2094229819
Cited by
1,867
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 131 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 138
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Keywords
protein biomarkers, biomarker discovery, biomarker validation, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, diagnostic biomarkers, biomarker qualification, research design
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Proteins, Humans, Peptide Mapping, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Protein Array Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review