Cited by 347Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Isotope dilution--mass spectrometric quantification of specific proteins: model application with apolipoprotein A-I

Barr, J R, Maggio, V L, Patterson, D G, Cooper, G R, Henderson, L O, Turner, W E, Smith, S J, Hannon, W H +2 more·1996·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

An enzymatic hydrolysis isotope dilution-mass spectrometric method was developed for reference quantification of specific proteins. The analytical procedure involved measuring a reproducibly hydrolyzed peptide (serving as the primary standard) unique to a specific protein. This new mass spectrometric method was evaluated by assessing the concentration of apolipoprotein (apo) A-I in the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) lyophilized Certified Reference Material (CRM 393). We used the method to make 96 measurements (4 replicate analyses of 4 enzymatic digests of 6 vials of BCR-CRM 393), which gave an average total protein mass of 1.048 mg (+/- 1.0% at 99% confidence limits). The total overall analytical CV was 3.95%. The results of this evaluation of our model approach to determine the concentration of a specific protein in a purified preparation demonstrated that our new mass spectrometric method can be used to measure apolipoproteins and other specific proteins without the use of epitopic immunoassay methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/42.10.1676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barr, J. R., Maggio, V. L., Patterson, D. G., Cooper, G. R., Henderson, L. O., Turner, W. E., Smith, S. J., Hannon, W. H., Needham, L. L., & Sampson, E. J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1676-1682
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W1892810170
Cited by
347
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
isotope dilution mass spectrometry, apolipoprotein A-I, protein quantification, enzymatic hydrolysis, certified reference materials, apolipoproteins, reference measurement procedure
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Hydrolysis, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Molecular Sequence Data, Molecular Weight, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Mapping, Mass Spectrometry, Trypsin, Spectrometry, Mass, Fast Atom Bombardment, Apolipoprotein A-I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review