The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue
Open accessAbstract
Hypoxic-ischemic injury is a prototype for insults characterized by extensive tissue loss. Seeding neural stem cells (NSCs) onto a polymer scaffold that was subsequently implanted into the infarction cavities of mouse brains injured by hypoxia-ischemia allowed us to observe the multiple reciprocal interactions that spontaneously ensue between NSCs and the extensively damaged brain: parenchymal loss was dramatically reduced, an intricate meshwork of many highly arborized neurites of both host- and donor-derived neurons emerged, and some anatomical connections appeared to be reconstituted. The NSC–scaffold complex altered the trajectory and complexity of host cortical neurites. Reciprocally, donor-derived neurons were seemingly capable of directed, target-appropriate neurite outgrowth (extending axons to the opposite hemisphere) without specific external instruction, induction, or genetic manipulation of host brain or donor cells. These “biobridges” appeared to unveil or augment a constitutive reparative response by facilitating a series of reciprocal interactions between NSC and host, including promoting neuronal differentiation, enhancing the elaboration of neural processes, fostering the re-formation of cortical tissue, and promoting connectivity. Inflammation and scarring were also reduced, facilitating reconstitution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortical development: View from neurological mutants two decades later
Rakic, P., & Caviness, V. S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90258-9 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Lutolf, M. P., & Hubbell, J. A. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1055 · Cited by 4,551
Stem cell therapy for human neurodegenerative disorders–how to make it work
Lindvall, O., Kokaia, Z., & Martinez-Serrano, A. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1064 · Cited by 915
Excitation-Neurogenesis Coupling in Adult Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells
Deisseroth, K., Singla, S., Toda, H., Monje, M., Palmer, T. D., & Malenka, R. C. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00266-1 · Cited by 674
Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4
Kim, J. B., Greber, B., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Meyer, J., Park, K. I., Zaehres, H., & Schöler, H. R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08436 · Cited by 577
Self-citationNeural stem cell therapy for subacute and chronic ischemic stroke
Boese, A. C., Le, Q.-S. E., Pham, D., Hamblin, M. H., & Lee, J.-P. (2018) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-018-0913-2 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, K. I., Teng, Y. D., & Snyder, E. Y.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2002-10-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1111-1117
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2089735370
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt751
- The paper
- Park, K. I., Teng, Y. D., & Snyder, E. Y. (2002). The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.