The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolite concentrations, fluxes and free energies imply efficient enzyme usage
Open accessAbstract
In metabolism, available free energy is limited and must be divided across pathway steps to maintain a negative ΔG throughout. For each reaction, ΔG is log proportional both to a concentration ratio (reaction quotient to equilibrium constant) and to a flux ratio (backward to forward flux). Here we use isotope labeling to measure absolute metabolite concentrations and fluxes in Escherichia coli, yeast and a mammalian cell line. We then integrate this information to obtain a unified set of concentrations and ΔG for each organism. In glycolysis, we find that free energy is partitioned so as to mitigate unproductive backward fluxes associated with ΔG near zero. Across metabolism, we observe that absolute metabolite concentrations and ΔG are substantially conserved and that most substrate (but not inhibitor) concentrations exceed the associated enzyme binding site dissociation constant (Km or Ki). The observed conservation of metabolite concentrations is consistent with an evolutionary drive to utilize enzymes efficiently given thermodynamic and osmotic constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In general, average metabolite concentrations generated from the model (Figure 6) show reasonable agreement to the values reported by Park et al. (2016) in E. coli, but the cell-to-cell variation in the kinetic models over a cell cycle is broader than the predicted range.”
From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Park et al. (2016)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The main deviation here is again with the FBA reaction where the kinetic parameters result in a free energy drop of roughly 25 kJ/mol which has been reported to be less than 10 kJ/mol (Flamholz et al., 2013; Park et al., 2016).”
From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Other studies have reported overall free energy changes from −30 to −70 kJ/mol (Flamholz et al., 2013; Park et al., 2016)”
From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the moment, only relative metabolomics data on Syn3A is available, so the metabolite concentrations used to initialize the simulations of the Syn3A WCM were estimated from a scaling of the comprehensive study done on E. coli (Park et al., 2016) and a limited list from M. pneumoniae (Yus et al., 2009).”
From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While such high concentrations have been reported in yeast (Park et al., 2016), they may be inaccurate for Syn3A.”
From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG
Kanehisa, M. I., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1076 · Cited by 3,103
Protein kinases — the major drug targets of the twenty-first century?
Cohen, P. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd773 · Cited by 2,232 · cited 1×
“Journal Nature chemical biology, 12(7)”
Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics
Cornish-Bowden, A. J. (1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04130-8 · Cited by 2,079
Physiological concentrations of purines and pyrimidines
Traut, T. W. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00928361 · Cited by 1,867
Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli
Bennett, B. D., Kimball, E. H., Gao, M., Osterhout, R., Van Dien, S. J., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.186 · Cited by 1,830 · cited 3×
“To understand how cells manage this challenge, biochemists have long relied on the ability to infer the free energies of cellular reactions (ΔG) based on metabolite concentrations combined with standard free energies27,28 as per equation (1).”
BackgroundMethodFeist, A. M., Henry, C. S., Reed, J. L., Krummenacker, M., Joyce, A. R., Karp, P. D., Broadbelt, L. J., Vassily Hatzimanikatis, A., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2007) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100155 · Cited by 1,408
Understanding the control of metabolism
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-6252 · Cited by 1,230
The Regulation of Cellular Systems
Heinrich, R., & Schuster, S. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1161-4 · Cited by 1,202
A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations
Raamsdonk, L. M., Teusink, B., Broadhurst, D., Zhang, N., Hayes, A., Walsh, M. C., BERDEN, J. A., Brindle, K. M., Kell, D. B., Rowland, J. J., et al. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/83496 · Cited by 1,021
Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast
de Godoy, L. M. F., Olsen, J. V., Cox, J., Nielsen, M. L., Hubner, N. C., Fröhlich, F., Walther, T. C., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07341 · Cited by 873
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 453
Mülleder, M., Campbell, K., Matsarskaia, O., Eckerstorfer, F., & Ralser, M. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.9606.1 · Cited by 39
Non‐natural Cofactor and Formate‐Driven Reductive Carboxylation of Pyruvate
Guo, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Li, Q., Liu, W., & Zhao, Z. K. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201915303 · Cited by 41
IMPDH inhibitors for antitumor therapy in tuberous sclerosis complex
Valvezan, A. J., Miller, S. K., McNamara, M. C., Torrence, M. E., Asara, J. M., Henske, E. P., & Manning, B. D. (2020) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.135071 · Cited by 39
Hostile Takeover: How Viruses Reprogram Prokaryotic Metabolism
Jacobson, T. B., Callaghan, M. M., & Amador‐Noguez, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-060621-043448 · Cited by 40
Sahin, A., Weilandt, D., & Vassily Hatzimanikatis, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38159-4 · Cited by 39
The Causes and Consequences of Nonenzymatic Protein Acylation
James, A. M., Smith, C. L., Smith, A. C., Robinson, A. J., Hoogewijs, K., & Murphy, M. P. (2018) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.07.002 · Cited by 40
Janasch, M., Asplund‐Samuelsson, J., Steuer, R., & Hudson, E. P. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ery382 · Cited by 39
“, 2009) and other heterotrophic organisms (Park et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHe, L., Xiu, Y., Jones, J. A., Baidoo, E. E. K., Keasling, J. D., Tang, Y., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2016) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2016.12.008 · Cited by 38
“From the perspective of the metabolite-enzyme relationship, most enzymes in central metabolism are not saturated with their substrates, and therefore the fluxes are sensitive to changes at the metabolic level (Bennett et al., 2009; Park et al., 2016).”
Tuure, H., Fengos, G., Ataman, M., Mišković, L., & Vassily Hatzimanikatis, A. (2018) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.10.005 · Cited by 40
Koendjbiharie, J. G., Hon, S., Pabst, M., Hooftman, R., Stevenson, D. M., Cui, J., Amador‐Noguez, D., Lynd, L. R., Olson, D. G., & van Kranenburg, R. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.011239 · Cited by 38
“9 mM respectively (26), which means that in vivo PfkA is highly saturated with F6P, but not with S7P.”
BackgroundSuthers, P. F., Foster, C., Sarkar, D., Wang, L., & Maranas, C. D. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.11.013 · Cited by 39
Rees, T. A. V., & Raven, J. A. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17190 · Cited by 41
Prospects of single-cell nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with quantum sensors
Neuling, N. R., Allert, R. D., & Bucher, D. (2023) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102975 · Cited by 40
Nagai, H., Masuda, A., Toya, Y., Matsuda, F., & Shimizu, H. (2018) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.02.012 · Cited by 37
ATP regulates RNA‐driven cold inducible RNA binding protein phase separation
Zhou, Q., Usluer, S., Zhang, F., Lenard, A. J., Bourgeois, B. M. R., & Madl, T. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4123 · Cited by 36
“Among them, and to our knowledge, only ATP has been reported to reach millimolar intra-cellular concentrations.(21) Nevertheless, further studies are required to define the exact (sub)cellular, and context-specific concentrations of these metabolites.”
BackgroundInfluentialA framework for understanding collective microbiome metabolism
Huelsmann, M., Schubert, O. T., & Ackermann, M. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01850-3 · Cited by 38
“Intracellular substrate concentrations underlie osmotic constraints 107 (that is, higher concentrations cause water influx and a subsequent build-up of turgor pressure, which would eventually rupture the cell envelope) 108 (Fig.”
Homeostasis of the biosynthetic E. coli metabolome
Radoš, D., Donati, S., Lempp, M., Rapp, J., & Link, H. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104503 · Cited by 34
Abernathy, M. H., Czajka, J. J., Allen, D. K., Hill, N. C., Cameron, J. C., & Tang, Y. (2019) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2019.04.010 · Cited by 34
“Change in pool sizes in response to carboxysome knockout Metabolite concentrations impact reaction free energy and flux organization (Park et al., 2016).”
BackgroundModel reduction of genome-scale metabolic models as a basis for targeted kinetic models
van Rosmalen, R. P., Smith, R. W., dos Santos, V. A. P. M., Fleck, C. C., & Diez, M. S. (2021) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.01.008 · Cited by 36
Tjhin, E. T., Spry, C., Sewell, A. L., Hoegl, A., Barnard, L., Sexton, A. E., Siddiqui, G., Howieson, V. M., Maier, A. G., Creek, D. J., et al. (2018) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006918 · Cited by 34
Strategies for Extending Metabolomics Studies with Stable Isotope Labelling and Fluxomics
Srivastava, A., Kowalski, G. M., Callahan, D. L., Meikle, P. J., & Creek, D. J. (2016) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo6040032 · Cited by 33
Learning from quantitative data to understand central carbon metabolism
Matsuda, F., Toya, Y., & Shimizu, H. (2017) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.09.006 · Cited by 33
“The results of a recent absolute-quantification analysis confirmed the previous estimation, which suggests that these kinase reaction steps are thermodynamically feasible (Park et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultMarszałek, I., Goch, W., & Bal, W. (2018) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00489 · Cited by 34
A functional analysis of 180 cancer cell lines reveals conserved intrinsic metabolic programs
Cherkaoui, S., Durot, S., Bradley, J., Critchlow, S. E., Dubuis, S., Masiero, M. M., Wegmann, R., Snijder, B., Othman, A., Bendtsen, C., et al. (2022) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202211033 · Cited by 32
“This is a consequence of enzyme kinetics and the fact that enzymes normally operate close to their substrate affinity (e.g., the Michaelis–Menten affinity constant KM) and far from saturation (Bar-Even et al, 2011; Park et al, 2016).”
BackgroundBringing the genetically minimal cell to life on a computer in 4D
Thornburg, Z. R., Maytin, A., Kwon, J., Brier, T. A., Gilbert, B. R., Fu, E., Gao, Y.-L., Quenneville, J., Wu, T., Li, H., et al. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.009 · Cited by 44
Dubuis, S., Ortmayr, K., & Zampieri, M. (2018) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-018-0111-x · Cited by 35
An Improved ATP FRET Sensor For Yeast Shows Heterogeneity During Nutrient Transitions
Botman, D., van Heerden, J. H., & Teusink, B. (2020) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.9b02475 · Cited by 34
Modular assembly of dynamic models in systems biology
Pan, M., Gawthrop, P. J., Cursons, J., & Crampin, E. J. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009513 · Cited by 34
“Furthermore, all reactions contribute significantly to the overall affinity, which differs from experimental measurements finding that the pfk and pyk are the predominant contributors to overall affinity, with the other reactions near equilibrium [68].”
Schatschneider, S., Abdelrazig, S., Safo, L., Henstra, A. M., Millat, T., Kim, D., Winzer, K., Minton, N. P., & Barrett, D. A. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04758 · Cited by 32
Thermodynamic constraints on the regulation of metabolic fluxes
Dai, Z., & Locasale, J. W. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.004372 · Cited by 31
“Accordingly, in a study comparing substrate concentrations and Km values in different cell types, among all substrate– enzyme interactions investigated, around 70% exhibited higher substrate concentration than the Km value, thus requiring a Michaelis–Menten or substrate-saturated, zero-order kinetics (30).”
BackgroundStructure‐Guided Design of Formate Dehydrogenase for Regeneration of a Non‐Natural Redox Cofactor
Guo, X., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Li, Q., Wang, J., Liu, W., & Zhao, Z. K. (2020) · Chemistry - A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.202003102 · Cited by 31
Kokaji, T., Hatano, A., Ito, Y., Yugi, K., Eto, M., Morita, K., Ohno, S., Fujii, M., Hironaka, K., Egami, R., et al. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaz1236 · Cited by 29
A parallel glycolysis provides a selective advantage through rapid growth acceleration
Law, R. C., Nurwono, G., & Park, J. O. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01395-2 · Cited by 30
Crosstalk between transcription and metabolism: how much enzyme is enough for a cell?
Donati, S., Sander, T., & Link, H. (2017) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1396 · Cited by 34
“coli, yeast, and mammalian cells are remarkably similar, with amino acids constituting the most abundant fraction of a cell’s metabolome.(10) Despite such similarities, recent studies suggest that metabolite concentrations contain a high amount of information.”
BackgroundSimulating biological processes: stochastic physics from whole cells to colonies
Earnest, T. M., Cole, J. A., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. A. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae2c · Cited by 29
Foster, C., Gopalakrishnan, S., Antoniewicz, M. R., & Maranas, C. D. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007319 · Cited by 29
“While the majority of metabolite concentration values estimated by k-ecoli74 fell within ranges consistent with experimental data [85], the loose constraints placed on optimization variables (enzyme complex fractional abundance (1�e < [e]< 1) and reverse reaction flux (0 < vr< 10000)) allowed elementary kinetic parame…”
BackgroundLagziel, S., Lee, W. D., & Shlomi, T. (2019) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-019-0669-x · Cited by 31
He, L., Fu, Y., & Lidstrom, M. E. (2019) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00748-19 · Cited by 28
Redirected nuclear glutamate dehydrogenase supplies Tet3 with α-ketoglutarate in neurons
Traube, F. R., Özdemir, D., Sahin, H., Scheel, C., Glück, A. F., Geserich, A. S., Oganesian, S., Kostidis, S., Iwan, K., Rahimoff, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24353-9 · Cited by 28
Yang, X., Ha, G., & Needleman, D. J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73808 · Cited by 34
“NADPH concentration can be comparable to that of NADH for other cell types such as tissue culture cells (Park et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialNutrient concentrations in food display universal behaviour
Menichetti, G., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00511-0 · Cited by 29
Bánki, K., & Perl, A. (2025) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103781 · Cited by 27
Okahashi, N., Maeda, K., Kawana, S., Iida, J., Shimizu, H., & Matsuda, F. (2018) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.08.011 · Cited by 27
On the Mechanism and Origin of Isoleucyl-tRNA Synthetase Editing against Norvaline
Biluš, M., Šemanjski, M., Močibob, M., Živković, I., Cvetešić, N., Tawfik, D. S., Tóth-Petróczy, Á., Maček, B., & Gruic‐Sovulj, I. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.029 · Cited by 27
Thermodynamic Cost, Speed, Fluctuations, and Error Reduction of Biological Copy Machines
Song, Y., & Hyeon, C. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00545 · Cited by 26
Xu, J. P., Martien, J. I., Gilbertson, C., Ma, J., Amador‐Noguez, D., & Park, J. O. (2020) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2020.02.018 · Cited by 27
Alsiyabi, A., Brown, B., Immethun, C. M., Long, D. S., Wilkins, M. R., & Saha, R. (2021) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.08.008 · Cited by 28
Tanaka, K., Shirai, T., Vavricka, C. J., Matsuda, M., Kondo, A., & Hasunuma, T. (2022) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac602 · Cited by 27
Lewis, J. E., Costantini, F., Mims, J., Chen, X., Furdui, C. M., Boothman, D. A., & Kemp, M. L. (2017) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7048 · Cited by 27
Pareto Optimality Explanation of the Glycolytic Alternatives in Nature
Ng, C. Y., Wang, L., Chowdhury, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38836-9 · Cited by 27
Probabilistic thermodynamic analysis of metabolic networks
Gollub, M. G., Kaltenbach, H., & Stelling, J. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab194 · Cited by 27
Integrating cellular and molecular structures and dynamics into whole-cell models
Luthey-Schulten, Z., Thornburg, Z. R., & Gilbert, B. R. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102392 · Cited by 23
Einzelzell‐Massenspektrometrie zur Untersuchung zellulärer Heterogenität
Zhang, L., & Vértes, Á. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.201709719 · Cited by 26
Reuß, D. R., Rath, H., Thürmer, A., Benda, M., Daniel, R., Völker, U., Mäder, U., Commichau, F. M., & Stülke, J. (2017) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2017.12.004 · Cited by 21
Microbial energy management—A product of three broad tradeoffs
McKinlay, J. B., Cook, G. M., & Hards, K. (2020) · Advances in microbial physiology/Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/bs.ampbs.2020.09.001 · Cited by 25
Jin, Q., Wu, Q., Shapiro, B. M., & McKernan, S. E. (2022) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02259-21 · Cited by 24
“These treatments are necessary, considering that metabolic reactions may proceed close to thermodynamic equilibrium and hence their rates may be limited by thermodynamics (36, 37).”
BackgroundStable isotope-resolved metabolomics based on mass spectrometry: Methods and their applications
Yu, D., Zhou, L., Liu, X., & Xu, G. (2023) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2023.116985 · Cited by 25
Österberg, L., Domenzain, I., Münch, J., Nielsen, J., Hohmann, S., & Cvijović, M. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008891 · Cited by 24
Mihalas, B. P., Marston, A. L., Wu, L. E., & Gilchrist, R. B. (2024) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-23-0510 · Cited by 26
“…process that are rate limited by ATP levels, as kinase enzymes – including those involved in the regulatory steps of meiosis – are unlikely to become rate limited by ATP concentrations, which in most cases exceed the K M of these enzymes by at least ten-fold (Bennett et al. 2009, Park et al. 2016).”
Thermodynamic uncertainty relation to assess biological processes
Song, Y., & Hyeon, C. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0043671 · Cited by 23
ATP Drives Efficient Terpene Biosynthesis in Marine Thraustochytrids
Zhang, A., Mernitz, K., Wu, C., Xiong, W., He, Y., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00881-21 · Cited by 23
“In reality, the measured acetyl-CoA concentration in eukaryotic cells is in the micromolar range (33), several hundredfold lower than the concentration used in the modeling.”
BackgroundSingle‐Cell Metabolomics by Mass Spectrometry: Opportunities and Challenges
Dolatmoradi, M., Samarah, L. Z., & Vértes, Á. (2021) · Analysis & Sensing · doi:10.1002/anse.202100032 · Cited by 23
Tian, L., Wang, A., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Guo, Y., Yuan, X., Liu, Y., & Geng, Y. (2024) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c01335 · Cited by 23
The minimum energy required to build a cell
Ortega-Arzola, E., Higgins, P. M., & Cockell, C. S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54303-6 · Cited by 21
“(1)), correcting for the absolute intracellular concentrations of products and reactants reported in different studies (Supplementary Tables S1–S4) 26,27 .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRubisCO Early Oxygenase Activity: A Kinetic and Evolutionary Perspective
Ślesak, I., Ślesak, H., & Kruk, J. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201700071 · Cited by 22
Frazão, C. J. R., Topham, C. M., Malbert, Y., François, J., & Walther, T. (2018) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20180765 · Cited by 21
Xiao, Z., Xiong, X., Sun, Y., Tourang, M., Chen, S., & Tang, Y. (2024) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131855 · Cited by 20
Zhou, N., Wilkes, R. A., Chen, X., Teitel, K. P., Belgrave, J. A., Beckham, G. T., Werner, A. Z., Yu, Y., & Aristilde, L. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08723-3 · Cited by 22
Khana, D. B., Callaghan, M. M., & Amador‐Noguez, D. (2021) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2021.11.007 · Cited by 18
Wang, J., Guo, X., Wan, L., Liu, Y., Xue, H., & Zhao, Z. K. (2022) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202100697 · Cited by 20
Khana, D. B., Tatli, M., Vazquez, J. C. R., Weraduwage, S. M., Stern, N., Hebert, A. S., Trujillo, E. A., Stevenson, D. M., Coon, J. J., Sharky, T. D., et al. (2023) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00092-23 · Cited by 20
Regulation of reaction fluxes via enzyme sequestration and co-clustering
Hinzpeter, F., Tostevin, F., & Gerland, U. (2019) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2019.0444 · Cited by 21
Grankvist, N., Lagerborg, K. A., Jain, M., & Nilsson, R. (2018) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01031 · Cited by 18
Kopina, B. J., Missoury, S., Collinet, B., Fulton, M. G., Cirio, C., TILBEURGH, H. V., & Lauhon, C. T. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab026 · Cited by 19
Hon, S., Jacobson, T. B., Stevenson, D. M., Maloney, M., Giannone, R. J., Hettich, R. L., Amador‐Noguez, D., Olson, D. G., & Lynd, L. R. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01258-22 · Cited by 19
“tion, allowing one to infer differences in free energy changes (16, 17).”
BackgroundExtracellular domains of CARs reprogramme T cell metabolism without antigen stimulation
Lakhani, A., Chen, X., Chen, L. C., Hong, M., Khericha, M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. Y., & Park, J. O. (2024) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-024-01034-7 · Cited by 21
“Based on the FBP aldolase reaction mechanism, which generates comparable fractions of M + 0 and M + 4 FBP in the reverse reaction 63 , FBP M + 0 and M + 4 fractions were set equal to each other in the [1,2-13 C 2 ]glucose experiments for 13 C-based metabolic flux analysis.”
InfluentialHe, H., Gómez-Coronado, P. A., Zarzycki, J., Barthel, S., Kahnt, J., Claus, P., Klein, M., Klose, M., de Crécy‐Lagard, V., Schindler, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53156-x · Cited by 19
Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Wu, X., Chen, Z., Chen, B., Wang, A., Guo, Y., Chen, W., Xue, R., Liu, Z., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53238-w · Cited by 19
Breakdown and repair of metabolism in the aging brain
Shichkova, P., Coggan, J. S., Kanari, L., Boci, E., Favreau, C., Antonel, S., Keller, D. X., & Markram, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Science · doi:10.3389/fsci.2025.1441297 · Cited by 22
Felczak, M. M., Jacobson, T. B., Ong, W. K., Amador‐Noguez, D., & TerAvest, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02270 · Cited by 19
“In E. coli, this ratio is ~0.1, allowing the DHAP to GAP conversion to operate close to equilibrium (ΔrG′ = −0.2 ± 1.1 kJ/mol) (Park et al., 2016).”
InfluentialMolecular determinants of phase separation for Drosophila DNA replication licensing factors
Parker, M. W., Kao, J., Huang, A., Berger, J. M., & Botchan, M. R. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.70535 · Cited by 17
“…ability of Cy5-dsDNA to induce phase separation over a range of protein (40–5000 nM) and KGlutamate (50–300 mM) concentrations that span physiological conditions (in vivo, [Cdt1] ≈ 100 nM [ Parker et al., 2019 ] and [salt] ≈ 150 mM [ Kretsinger et al., 2013 ; Park et al., 2016 ]; Figure 2F, G ).”
Dissecting Flux Balances to Measure Energetic Costs in Cell Biology: Techniques and Challenges
Arunachalam, E., Ireland, W. T., Yang, X., & Needleman, D. J. (2022) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-105251 · Cited by 18
“Other ATPases can have a Michaelis-Menten constant KM close to intracellular ATP/ADP levels, and their reaction rates and directions could be similarly sensitive to changes in ATP/ADP induced by perturbations [8, 12].”
BackgroundRational strain design with minimal phenotype perturbation
Narayanan, B., Weilandt, D., Masid, M., Mišković, L., & Vassily Hatzimanikatis, A. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44831-0 · Cited by 19
Dynamics in redox metabolism, from stoichiometry towards kinetics
Verhagen, K. J. A., van Gulik, W. M., & Wahl, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2020.01.002 · Cited by 18
“Compartmentation allows the establishment of different environments within a cell, thereby providing a wider range of thermodynamic possibilities [8].”
BackgroundControl of topoisomerase II activity and chemotherapeutic inhibition by TCA cycle metabolites
Lee, J. H., Mosher, E. P., Lee, Y., Bumpus, N. N., & Berger, J. M. (2021) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.08.014 · Cited by 18
Pokhrel, A., Poudel, A., Castro, K. B., Celestine, M. J., Oludiran, A., Rinehold, A. J., Resek, A. M., Mhanna, M. A., & Purcell, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00377-20 · Cited by 16
Maret, W. (2025) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.004 · Cited by 18
Engineering metabolism to modulate immunity
Kapnick, S. M., Martin, C. A., & Jewell, C. M. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115122 · Cited by 18
Inferring mitochondrial and cytosolic metabolism by coupling isotope tracing and deconvolution
Stern, A., Fokra, M., Sarvin, B. A., Alrahem, A. A., Lee, W. D., Aizenshtein, E., Sarvin, N., & Shlomi, T. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42824-z · Cited by 19
Araki, C., Okahashi, N., Maeda, K., Shimizu, H., & Matsuda, F. (2018) · Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.5702/massspectrometry.a0067 · Cited by 16
Kloska, S. M., Pałczyński, K., Marciniak, T., Talaśka, T., Wysocki, B. J., Davis, P. H., & Wysocki, T. A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41765-3 · Cited by 16
Evaluation of kinetic data: What the numbers tell us about PRMTs
Frankel, A., & Brown, J. I. (2018) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.10.010 · Cited by 16
Estimating Metabolic Equilibrium Constants: Progress and Future Challenges
Du, B., Zielinski, D. C., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2018) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.09.009 · Cited by 16
Marszałek, I., Goch, W., & Bal, W. (2019) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02419 · Cited by 16
Queueing theory model of Krebs cycle
Kloska, S. M., Pałczyński, K., Marciniak, T., Talaśka, T., Nitz, M., Wysocki, B. J., Davis, P. H., & Wysocki, T. A. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab177 · Cited by 16
Enhanced 13 C NMR detects extended reaction networks in living cells
Jensen, P. R., Sannelli, F., Stauning, L. T., & Meier, S. (2021) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d1cc03838a · Cited by 16
Integrative metabolic flux analysis reveals an indispensable dimension of phenotypes
Law, R. C., Lakhani, A., O’Keeffe, S., Erşan, S., & Park, J. O. (2022) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102701 · Cited by 16
Cannon, W. R., Zucker, J., Baxter, D. J., Kumar, N., Baker, S., Hurley, J., & Dunlap, J. (2018) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr6060063 · Cited by 16
Barsottini, M. R. D. O., Copsey, A. C., Young, L., Baroni, R. M., Cordeiro, A. T., Pereira, G. A. G., & Moore, A. L. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0981-6 · Cited by 16
Adamczyk, P., Hwang, H. J., Chang, T.-H., Gao, Y., Baidoo, E. E. K., Kim, J., Webb‐Robertson, B., Flores, J. E., Quijano, K. C., Burnet, M., et al. (2025) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2025.02.014 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. O., Rubin, S. A., Xu, Y.-F., Amador-Noguez, D., Fan, J., Shlomi, T., & Rabinowitz, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Rabinowitz, Joshua D
- Venue
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Published
- 2016-05-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 482-489
- ISSN
- 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4469
- PMC
- PMC4912430
- OpenAlex
- W2346094579
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 13
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0012461)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA163591)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
- Keywords
- metabolic flux, metabolite concentrations, enzyme catalytic efficiency, isotopic labeling, glycolysis, reaction quotient, equilibrium constants, Escherichia coli, yeast, thermodynamics of metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Enzymes, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Thermodynamics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review