The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some surveys indicate that perceived uncertainty among scientists is negatively related to supportive attitudes (e.g., Ding et al., 2011)”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Recent research has shown that the role of worldview may be attenuated by underscoring the breadth of consensus among scientists: When people are informed of the pervasive consensus about the fundamentals of climate change, they become more likely to endorse the basic premise of global warming, and they attribute a larger share of the observed warming trend to human CO2 emissions [37], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values
Leiserowitz, A. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 · Cited by 2,371
Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,699
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp075 · Cited by 956
The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism
Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010802055576 · Cited by 763
(2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603029 · Cited by 728
Miller, J. D. (2004) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662504044908 · Cited by 639
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009) · Eos · doi:10.1029/2009eo030002 · Cited by 568
Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. E. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x · Cited by 560
Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9068-8 · Cited by 543
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276409356001 · Cited by 539
Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels
Callegaro, M., & DiSogra, C. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn065 · Cited by 516
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39003-x · Cited by 441
Defeating the merchants of doubt
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/465686a · Cited by 292 · cited 2×
“‘global warming is caused by both human activities and natural change’; (3) ‘global warming is caused mostly by”
BackgroundClimate cover-up: the crusade to deny global warming
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5663 · Cited by 237
Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming
Wood, B. D., & Vedlitz, A. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00267.x · Cited by 222
Americans’ Knowledge of Climate Change
educhenin (2010) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · doi:10.58079/alrr · Cited by 188
Yale Project on Climate Change Communication
(2013) · International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management · doi:10.1108/ijccsm.2013.41405aaa.006 · Cited by 60
Moving beyond scientific agreement
Anderegg, W. R. L. (2010) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9925-3 · Cited by 15
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Burkemann, O. Memo exposes Bush’s new green strategy. The Guardian (4 March 2003); available via http://go.nature.com/NfYAsm .
- Revkin, A. C. Bush aide softened greenhouse gas links to global warming. The New York Times (8 June 2005); available via http://go.nature.com/8lUN4e .
- Munor, G., Leary, S. & Lasane, T. Between a rock and a hard place: Biased assimilation of scientific information in the face of commitment. North Am. J. Psychol. 6, 431–444 (2004).
- Lakoff, G. Don’t Think of an Elephant (Chelea Green Publishing, 2004).
- MacKinnon, D. P. Introduction to Statistics Mediation Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616
Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming
Cook, J., Орескес, Н., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S., et al. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002 · Cited by 1,637
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R. G., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. G. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 · Cited by 1,518
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058
Self-citationWhat explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2015) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · Cited by 1,089
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A.
- Affiliations
- San Diego State University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maibach, Edward W.
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2011-11-20
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 462-466
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2035305558
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 62.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Surdna Foundation
- George Mason University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- scientific controversy, climate policy support, climate change beliefs, climate change denial, American public opinion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
