Cited by 441Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory Processes and InfluencesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: implications for debiasing and public information campaigns

Schwarz, Norbert, Sanna, Lawrence J., Skurnik, Ian, Yoon, Carolyn·2007·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39003-x

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Corrective strategies may appear effective immediately yet backfire even after a short delay, when the message they tried to convey gradually fades from memory, allowing common misconceptions to be more easily remembered and identified as true.

    “This is especially true because corrective strategies may appear effective immediately yet backfire even after a short delay, when the message they tried to convey gradually fades from memory, allowing common misconceptions to be more easily remembered and identified as true [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2007
Pages
127-161
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531042714
Cited by
441
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
32.12
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
metacognition, metacognitive experience, judgment and decision making, bias mitigation, information campaigns, fluency, experiential information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review