The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science

Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.

Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495

A power primer.

Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771

Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920

The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves

Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02300 · Cited by 2,787

Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations

Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.924 · Cited by 2,452

The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814

Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.

Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686

Increase of extreme events in a warming world

Rahmstorf, S., & Coumou, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101766108 · Cited by 1,319

Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010

Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221

Expert credibility in climate change

Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · Cited by 872

The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections

Benjamin, D. M., & Budescu, D. V. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403 · Cited by 27

EIMECA: A Proposal for a Model of Environmental Collective Action

Carmona-Moya, B., Calvo‐Salguero, A., & Aguilar‐Luzón, M. D. C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13115935 · Cited by 27

Effects of Conspiracy Rhetoric on Views About the Consequences of Climate Change and Support for Direct Carbon Capture

Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1991967 · Cited by 27

Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change

Ecker, U. K. H., Sanderson, J. A., McIlhiney, P., Rowsell, J., Quekett, H., Brown, G. D. A., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221111750 · Cited by 27

Nigerian teachers' self‐reported climate science literacy and expressed training needs on climate change concepts: Prospects of job‐embedded situative professional development

Eze, E. I., Nwagu, E. K. N., & Onuoha, J. C. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21743 · Cited by 27

Climate change communication insights from cooperative Extension professionals in the US Southern states: finding common ground

Bowers, A. W., Monroe, M. C., & Adams, D. C. (2016) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1176947 · Cited by 27

Financial market response to extreme events indicating climatic change

Anttila-Hughes, J. (2016) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2015-50098-6 · Cited by 29

Self-assessed understanding of climate change

Hamilton, L. C. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2305-0 · Cited by 27

Epistemic Communities and Public Support for the Paris Agreement on Climate Change

Maliniak, D., Parajon, E., & Powers, R. (2020) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912920946400 · Cited by 26

Response by Cook to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”

Cook, J. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1377095 · Cited by 26

‘Time to Wake Up’: Climate change advocacy in a polarized Congress, 1996-2015

Guber, D. L., Bohr, J., & Dunlap, R. E. (2020) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1786333 · Cited by 27

More Evidence of Psychological Reactance to Consensus Messaging: A Response to van der Linden, Maibach, and Leiserowitz (2019)

Dixon, G., Hmielowski, J. D., & Ma, Y. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1671472 · Cited by 26

Water security determines social attitudes about dams and reservoirs in South Europe

Dopico, E., Arboleya, E., Fernández, S., Borrell, Y. J., Consuegra, S., de Leániz, C. G., Lázaro, G., Rodríguez, C., & García‐Vázquez, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10170-7 · Cited by 25

Responding to Climate Change Skepticism and the Ideological Divide

Lasoff-Santos, J., & Feygina, I. (2017) · Michigan Journal of Sustainability · doi:10.3998/mjs.12333712.0005.102 · Cited by 26

Combatting rumors around the French election: the memorability and effectiveness of fact-checking articles

Fazio, L. K., Hong, M. K., & Pillai, R. M. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00500-2 · Cited by 26

The psychological contamination of pro-environmental consensus: Political pressure for environmental belief agreement undermines its long-term power

Conway, L. G., & Repke, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.001 · Cited by 24

Losses, hopes, and expectations for sustainable futures after COVID

Lewandowsky, S., Facer, K., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00961-0 · Cited by 27

Are People High in Skepticism About Anthropogenic Climate Change Necessarily Resistant to Influence? Some Cause for Optimism

Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., McStay, R., Reser, J., & Bradley, G. L. (2015) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916515574085 · Cited by 27

Neutralizing the Effect of Political Worldviews by Communicating Scientific Agreement: A Thought-Listing Study

Dixon, G., & Hubner, A. Y. (2018) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547018769907 · Cited by 24

Engaging scientists in science communication: The effect of social proof and meaning

Hu, S., Li, Z., Zhang, J., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.210 · Cited by 23

Communicating expert consensus increases personal support for COVID‐19 mitigation policies

Kerr, J. R., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12827 · Cited by 23

Between conflation and denial – the politics of climate expertise in Australia

Tangney, P. (2018) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2018.1551482 · Cited by 23

Superintelligence Skepticism as a Political Tool

Baum, S. D. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9090209 · Cited by 26

Communicating Climate Change: Probabilistic Expressions and Concrete Events

Joslyn, S. L., & Demnitz, R. (2019) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-18-0126.1 · Cited by 22

Communications about uncertainty in scientific climate-related findings: a qualitative systematic review

Kause, A., de Bruin, W. B., Domingos, S., Mittal, N., Lowe, J. A., & Fung, F. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abb265 · Cited by 26

Failures to disagree are essential for environmental science to effectively influence policy development

Norberg, J., Blenckner, T., Cornell, S., Petchey, O. L., & Hillebrand, H. (2022) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13984 · Cited by 22

Communicating Climate Change: A Qualitative Study Exploring how Communicators and Educators are Approaching Climate-Change Discussions

Rohling, K., Wandersee, C., Baker, L. M., & Tomlinson, P. J. (2016) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1232 · Cited by 26

Wahrnehmung des Klimawandels durch die Bevölkerung und Konsequenzen für die Risikokommunikation

Berger, N., Lindemann, A., & Böl, G. (2019) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-019-02930-0 · Cited by 22

Promoting Evidence Based Nutrition Education Across the World in a Competitive Space: Delivering a Massive Open Online Course

Gibson, S., Adamski, M. M., Blumfield, M., Dart, J., Murgia, C., Volders, E., & Truby, H. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12020344 · Cited by 22

Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions

Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M., & Betsch, C. (2020) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.125 · Cited by 22

Effects of consensus messages and political ideology on climate change attitudes: inconsistent findings and the effect of a pretest

Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03200-2 · Cited by 22

A Sampling Framework for Uncertainty in Individual Environmental Decisions

Galešić, M., Kause, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12172 · Cited by 24

The impact of anecdotal information on medical decision-makingPreprint

Jaramillo, S., Horne, Z., & Goldwater, M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r5pmj · Cited by 22

Updating politicized beliefs: How motivated reasoning contributes to polarization

Su, S. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101799 · Cited by 23

The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels

Harris, A. J. L., Sildmäe, O., Speekenbrink, M., & Hahn, U. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416 · Cited by 21

Lacuna publics: advancing a typology of disinformation-susceptible publics using the motivation-attitude-knowledge framework

Krishna, A. (2021) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2021.1944155 · Cited by 20

How others drive our sense of understanding of policies

Rabb, N., Han, J. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.40 · Cited by 20

Conspiratory fascination versus public interest: the case of ‘climategate’

Lewandowsky, S. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/111004 · Cited by 19

Knowledge Helps: Mechanistic Information and Numeric Evidence as Cognitive Levers to Overcome Stasis and Build Public Consensus on Climate Change

Clark, D., Ranney, M. A., & Felipe, J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 19

Is Dealing with Climate Change a Corporation’s Responsibility? A Social Contract Perspective

Unsworth, K. L., Russell, S., & Davis, M. C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01212 · Cited by 19

Climate change ignorance: an unacceptable legacy

Boon, H. J. (2014) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-014-0156-x · Cited by 23

Convenient but biased? The reliability of convenience samples in research about attitudes toward climate changePreprint

Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2h7as · Cited by 21

Sustainability awareness and smart meter privacy concerns: The cases of US and Germany

Schallehn, F., & Valogianni, K. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112756 · Cited by 18

Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors

Todorova, B., Steyrl, D., Hornsey, M. J., Pearson, S. G., Brick, C., Lange, F., Bavel, J. J. V., Vlasceanu, M., Lamm, C., & Doell, K. C. (2025) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-025-00251-4 · Cited by 21

Climate change: time to Do Something Different

Page, N. C., & Page, M. P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01294 · Cited by 18

Collective behaviour, uncertainty and environmental change

Bentley, R. A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0461 · Cited by 18

Review of the consensus and asymmetric quality of research on human-induced climate change

Abraham, J., Cook, J., Fasullo, J., Jacobs, P., Mandia, S. A., & Nuccitelli, D. (2014) · Cited by 18

Are science festivals a good place to discuss heated topics?

Altay, S., & Lakhlifi, C. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19010207 · Cited by 19

The Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: History, Philosophy, and Culture

Galison, P. L., Doboszewski, J., Elder, J., Martens, N. C. M., Ashtekar, A., Enander, J., Gueguen, M., Kessler, E. A., Lalli, R., Lesourd, M., et al. (2023) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies11010032 · Cited by 18

Are we ready to build health systems that consider the climate?

Mayhew, S., Belle, S. V., & Hammer, M. (2013) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819613516943 · Cited by 18

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Holford, D. L., Fasce, A., Tapper, K., Demko, M., Lewandowsky, S., Hahn, U., Abels, C. M., Al‐Rawi, A., Alladin, S. N. B., Boender, T. S., et al. (2023) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470231162634 · Cited by 18

Scientific and religious beliefs are primarily shaped by testimony

Ma, S., Payir, A., Mcloughlin, N. C., & Harris, P. L. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.04.014 · Cited by 17

Learning from and about scientists: Consensus messaging shapes perceptions of climate change and climate scientists

Orchinik, R., Dubey, R., Gershman, S. J., Powell, D., & Bhui, R. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae485 · Cited by 18

When probabilities change: perceptions and implications of trends in uncertain climate forecasts

Hohle, S. M., & Teigen, K. H. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1459801 · Cited by 17

COVID-19 vaccine skeptics are persuaded by pro-vaccine expert consensus messaging.

Białek, M., Meyers, E. A., Arriaga, P., Harateh, D., & Urbanek, A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000467 · Cited by 16

How aggregated opinions shape beliefs

Oktar, K., & Lombrozo, T. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7 · Cited by 17

The benefits to climate science of including early-career scientists as reviewers

Casado, M., Gremion, G., Rosenbaum, P. R., Caccavo, J. A., Aho, K., Champollion, N., Connors, S. L., Dahood, A. D., Fernández, A., Lizotte, M., et al. (2020) · Geoscience Communication · doi:10.5194/gc-3-89-2020 · Cited by 16

Knowledge Brokers in Crisis: Public Communication of Science During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Martini, C., Battisti, D., Bina, F., & Consolandi, M. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2116961 · Cited by 16

Climate Change Misinformation in the United States: An Actor–Network Analysis

Magar, N. T., Thapa, B. J., & Li, Y. (2024) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia5020040 · Cited by 16

Cyber-echoes of climate crisis: Unraveling anthropogenic climate change narratives on social media

Elroy, O., Komendantova, N., & Yosipof, A. (2024) · Current Research in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100256 · Cited by 19

Using a News Article to Convey Climate Science Consensus Information

Rode, J. B., Iqbal, S., Butler, B. J., & Ditto, P. H. (2021) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470211027235 · Cited by 16

The effects of repetition spacing on the illusory truth effect

Udry, J., White, S. K., & Barber, S. J. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105157 · Cited by 20

Worldviews, Issue Knowledge, and the Pollution of a Local Science Information Environment

Ahern, L. A., Connolly-Ahern, C., & Hoewe, J. (2016) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547016636388 · Cited by 16

Drafting an Effective Ethical Code of Conduct for Professional Societies: A Practical Guide

Hardy, M. C. (2016) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci6040016 · Cited by 16

Countering Superintelligence Misinformation

Baum, S. D. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9100244 · Cited by 18

Persuasion And Epistemic Paternalism

McKenna, R. (2020) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798881810580.ch-006 · Cited by 16

Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Identify Complex Solutions and Optimal Combinations of Conditions Influencing COVID Vaccine Acceptance: A Primer for QCA

Brush, G. J., Guo, X., Hunting, A., & Frethey‐Bentham, C. (2023) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/02761467231182300 · Cited by 18

Consensus messaging in climate change communication: Metacognition as moderator variable in the gateway belief model

Said, N., Frauhammer, L. T., & Huff, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102128 · Cited by 15

Oceanic Mixing over the Northern Arabian Sea in a Warming Scenario: Tug of War between Wind and Buoyancy Forces

Praveen, V., Valsala, V. K., Ajayamohan, R. S., & Balasubramanian, S. (2020) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-19-0173.1 · Cited by 15

Improving GM Consensus Acceptance Through Reduced Reactance and Climate Change-based Message Targeting

Hasell, A., Lyons, B. A., Tallapragada, M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1746377 · Cited by 15

Future Global Change and Cognition

Lewandowsky, S. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12188 · Cited by 15

History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming

Reußwig, F. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031003 · Cited by 17

Public response to solar geoengineering: how media frames about stratospheric aerosol injection affect opinions

Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Luke, R. E. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03575-4 · Cited by 14

Life-cycle assessment of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity

Adhikari, B. B., & Pellegrino, J. (2015) · Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1063/1.4929462 · Cited by 15

Anecdotes impact medical decisions even when presented with statistical information or decision aids

Line, E. N., Jaramillo, S., Goldwater, M. B., & Horne, Z. (2024) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00577-3 · Cited by 13

Introduction to the Research handbook on communicating climate change

Holmes, D. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789900408.00006 · Cited by 13

Policy or scientific messaging? Strategic framing in a case of subnational climate change conflict

Cann, H. W. (2021) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12438 · Cited by 13

Partisan Cueing and Polarization in Public Opinion About Climate Change

Guber, D. L. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 · Cited by 16

Tracing the Flow of Climate Change Frames: Intermedia Agenda Setting Between Twitter and News Media in the US and the UK

Wang, Z., Song, Y., & Chen, Z. (2023) · Emerging Media · doi:10.1177/27523543231218296 · Cited by 13

Most Christian American religious leaders silently believe in climate change, and informing their congregation can help open dialogue

Syropoulos, S., & Sparkman, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2419705122 · Cited by 12

Moving from Directives toward Audience Empowerment: A Typology of Recycling Communication Strategies of Local Governments

Lee, D. N., & Krieger, J. L. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072722 · Cited by 12

Heuristic and systematic processing differentially influence the effects of scientific consensus messaging on perceived scientific consensus

Kobayashi, K. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01275-1 · Cited by 12

How Negative Frames Can Undermine Public Support for Studying Solar Geoengineering in the U.S

Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.850514 · Cited by 14

Pre-registered replication of the gateway belief model – Results from a representative German sample

Said, N., Frauhammer, L. T., & Huff, M. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101910 · Cited by 12

Public health science in agriculture: Farmers' perspectives on respiratory protection research

Janssen, B., & Nonnenmann, M. W. (2017) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.008 · Cited by 12

Social support for de-carbonizing the energy system: The role of expressive partisanship

Mayer, A. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.013 · Cited by 12

Some Deficits and Some Misperceptions: Linking Partisanship With Climate Change Cognitions

Chinn, S., & Josh Pasek, B. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa007 · Cited by 14

Finding common ground: Understanding and engaging with science mistrust in the Great barrier reef region

Curnock, M., Nembhard, D., Smith, R., Sambrook, K., Hobman, E. V., Mankad, A., PERT, P. L., & Chamberland, E. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308252 · Cited by 11

Undergraduate Biology Students’ Climate Change Communication Experiences Indicate a Need for Discipline-Based Education Research on Science Communication Education about Culturally Controversial Science Topics

Bowen, C. D., Coscia, K. A., Aadnes, M. G., Summersill, A. R., & Barnes, M. E. (2025) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.23-07-0134 · Cited by 13

Framing experts' (dis)agreements about uncertain environmental events

Løhre, E., Sobków, A., Hohle, S. M., & Teigen, K. H. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2132 · Cited by 11

Factual information on the environmental impacts of consumption abroad increases citizens' problem awareness, but not support for mitigating such impacts

Presberger, D., Quoß, F., Rudolph, L., & Bernauer, T. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.019 · Cited by 12

Selective and deceptive citation in the construction of dueling consensuses

Beers, A. L., Nguyễn, S., Starbird, K., West, J. D., & Spiro, E. S. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh1933 · Cited by 11

The Role of Future Orientation, Cultural Worldviews, and Collective Efficacy in the American Public’s Climate Change Attitudes and Policy Support

Wang, X. (2017) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx001 · Cited by 11

Communicating highly divergent levels of scientific and social consensus: its effects on people’s scientific beliefs

Kobayashi, K. (2019) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2019.1650105 · Cited by 11

Trust in Science and Scientists: Implications for (Higher) Education

Vaupotič, N., Kienhues, D., & Jucks, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_10 · Cited by 13

Climate news articles lack basic climate science

Romps, D. M., & Retzinger, J. P. (2019) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ab37dd · Cited by 12

The explanation-polarisation model: Pseudoscience spreads through explanatory satisfaction and group polarisation

Fasce, A. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8051 · Cited by 10

Participating in a climate prediction market increases concern about global warming

Cerf, M., Matz, S., & MacIver, M. A. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01679-4 · Cited by 11

Revisiting recycled water for the next drought; a case study of South East Queensland, Australia

James, C., Kavanagh, M., Manton, C., & Soar, J. (2023) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2023.101626 · Cited by 10

Climate Science Denial as Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance

Mason, S. E. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1739167 · Cited by 12

The Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Matters

Powell, J. L. (2016) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467617707079 · Cited by 32

Climate Scientists Virtually Unanimous

Powell, J. L. (2015) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467616634958 · Cited by 37

Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change

Bertoldo, R. B., Mays, C., Böhm, G., Poortinga, W., Marc Poumadère, A., Tvinnereim, E. M., Arnold, A., Steentjes, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519865448 · Cited by 35

Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety

Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295 · Cited by 95

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

Kammen, D. M., & Wright, G. (2013) · Cited by 104