The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In one experimental study, underscoring the consensus was particularly effective for people whose worldview otherwise might have predisposed them towards rejection of climate science [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Recent research has shown that the role of worldview may be attenuated by underscoring the breadth of consensus among scientists: When people are informed of the pervasive consensus about the fundamentals of climate change, they become more likely to endorse the basic premise of global warming, and they attribute a larger share of the observed warming trend to human CO2 emissions [37], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A further 3 items queried scientific propositions that were also used in previous research [27], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationThe role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves
Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02300 · Cited by 2,787
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.924 · Cited by 2,452
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Increase of extreme events in a warming world
Rahmstorf, S., & Coumou, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101766108 · Cited by 1,319
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221
Expert credibility in climate change
Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · Cited by 872
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 530
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate ChangePreprint
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/vg74q · Cited by 2
Analitičko rasuđivanje i uvjerenja koja proizvode polarizaciju
Maglić, M. (2023) · doi:10.17234/diss.2023.102859 · Cited by 2
Theoretical Model of Behavioral Consequences of Faith in Conspiracy Theory
Ярош, Н. С., & Artiukhova, V. (2021) · Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. A Series of Psychology · doi:10.26565/2225-7756-2021-70-10 · Cited by 1
Chkoniya, V., Reykowska, D., Ohme, R. K., & Côrte-Real, A. (2022) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9268-0_35 · Cited by 1
Yusri, Mushaddiq, M. A., Awaliyah, N. I., Kahar, S. H., Arqomi, R. J. A., & Muhammad, E. S. S. A. (2024) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-06-2024-0402 · Cited by 1
Framing and Public Opinion on the Causes of Urban Wildfires in the United States
Palm, R., Bolsen, T., & Kingsland, J. T. (2026) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2026.2681151 · Cited by 1
Synthesizing a preliminary framework of the core constructs of climate change acceptance
Duke, J., & Holt, E. A. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03969-6 · Cited by 1
Carbon removal support is tempered by concerns over whether biological methods are worth it
Cox, E., Waller, L., Palmer, J., & Bellamy, R. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02654-x · Cited by 1
Scheer, M., Weinberg, A. E., McMeeking, L. B. S., & Balgopal, M. M. (2025) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-24-0061.1 · Cited by 1
Helm, R. K., Greenhalgh, T., Williamson, J., & Trofimov, A. (2026) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102634 · Cited by 2
Consensus Messaging Shifts Beliefs About Climate Change in a Field Experiment
Rode, J. B., Clarke, C. E., & van der Linden, S. (2026) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470261442409 · Cited by 1
Yen, M., & Li, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-01-2026-0076 · Cited by 1
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Lungu, D. A., Røislien, J., Smeets, I., Wiig, S., & Brønnick, K. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/48882 · Cited by 1
High Cost of Scientific Ignorance: A Conceptual Foundation for Scientific Literacy in the Courts
Mason, S., & Lorandos, D. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70001 · Cited by 1
Faugère, C. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6070147 · Cited by 2
The Building Blocks of Public Engagement
Corner, A., & Clarke, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46744-3_3 · Cited by 1
Political science: Partisans' science interests
Bolsen, T. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0076 · Cited by 1
Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework
Baucum, M., & John, R. S. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.03.003 · Cited by 1
Political Knowledge and Fractured Perceptions
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0012 · Cited by 1
A Partisan and Polarized Issue in the United States
Palm, R. I., & Bolsen, T. (2020) · Coastal research library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32602-9_3 · Cited by 1
Persuasion and Intellectual Autonomy
McKenna, R. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003003465-9 · Cited by 1
1. Introduction: Genre in the Climate Debate
Auken, S. (2021) · doi:10.1515/9788395720499-002 · Cited by 1
Combating Misinformation in the Open Access Era
Shakeri, S., & Hawamdeh, S. (2022) · Advances in knowledge acquisition, transfer, and management book series/Advances in knowledge acquisition, transfer and management book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9805-4.ch011 · Cited by 1
Climate Security and the Military
van Fenema, P. C., Beeres, R. J. M., Bertrand, R., de Rooij, J. P., Schijvenaars, G., Haitsma, S., & Hardeman, E. (2024) · Leiden University Press eBooks · doi:10.24415/9789087284381 · Cited by 2
Cormick, C., & Edelsztein, V. C. (2026) · Daímon · doi:10.6018/daimon.558391 · Cited by 1
Damnjanović, K., Lep, Ž., & Ilić, S. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/f2b5w · Cited by 1
Ganderton, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0238 · Cited by 1
Vaccination intentions during COVID-19 emergency: Correlational research in Italy and SerbiaPreprint
di Napoli, F. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y4zer · Cited by 1
Bogert, J. M. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.997 · Cited by 2
Lacroix, K. (2015) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)
Climate change as a knowledge controversy : investigating debates over science and policy
Sharman, A. (2015) · London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Learning as change: Responding to socio-scientific issues through informal education
Allen, L. B. (2016) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
New Voices to Diversify the Climate Discourse
Corner, A., & Clarke, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46744-3_6
Journal of Applied Communications 100(3) Full Issue
Ellis, J. D. (2016) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1236
ACTIVE LEARNING EFFECT ON THE PUBLIC’S PERCEPTION OF ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
Trevizo, I. G., & Pennington, D. D. (2017) · Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · doi:10.1130/abs/2017am-297050
Urban, J., Chabada, T., & Skalík, J. (2018) · Envigogika · doi:10.14712/18023061.563
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0001
Dueling Facts in Political Science
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0003
The Democratic Consequences of Dueling Facts
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0010
Let Facts Be Submitted to a Candid World
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0013
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0016
The Psychology of Fact Perceptions II
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0006
A Theory of Intuitive Epistemology
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0008
Dueling Facts in American Politics
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0004
What Smarter People Have Said About Facts
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0002
Polarized Leaders Versus Polarized Values
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0007
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0005
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0011
Citizen Reponses to Fact-Checking
Marietta, M., Barker, D. C., Nalder, K., & Martin, D. J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0014
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0009
Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Durability
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0015
Decision Analysis of Surgical Treatment Indications for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
Pahuta, M. A. (2019) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-23634
Death Penalty Beliefs: How Attitudes are Shaped and RevisedPreprint
Miske, O. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Individuals in International Relations
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0002
The Structural Context for Billionaires
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0003
The Political Agency of Billionaires
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0004
Lewandowsky, S., Woike, J. K., & Oberauer, K. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/m25jr
Self-citationEffective Communication About Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise
Palm, R. I., & Bolsen, T. (2021) · Coastal research library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88435-2_4
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0007
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0006
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0003
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0002
Promoting Climate Actions: A Cognitive-Constraints ApproachPreprint
Lee, J.-H., Wong, E., & Cheng, P. W. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5g7aq
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0004
Steg, L., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119241072.refs
Madsen, J. K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4_3
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0001
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0008
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0006
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0005
Three Essays on the Politics of American Social ProgramsPreprint
Zhang, B. (2020) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/7aytg
A Paradox of Information Aggregation
Mercier, H. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197636916.003.0014
Scientist perspectives toward the status and management of gray wolves in the western United States
Crooks, K. R., Gonzalez, M. N., & Ghasemi, B. (2022) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.12728
Opinion Formation in Light of the Facts
Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197578384.003.0012
Climate Change Beliefs and their Correlates in Latin AmericaPreprint
Spektor, M., Fasolin, G. N., & Camargo, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2224241/v2
Preface: Rational Social Animals Go Wild
Levy, N. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.002.0006
Levy, N. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.002.0003
Anderson and Goldman on Identifying Experts
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0003
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0004
What Is Non-Ideal Epistemology?
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0001
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.002.0006
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.002.0003
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0006
Liberatory Virtue and Vice Epistemology
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0007
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.002.0004
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0008
Climate Change Beliefs and their Correlates in Latin AmericaPreprint
Spektor, M., Fasolin, G. N., & Camargo, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2224241/v3
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.002.0003
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.002.0004
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.002.0007
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.002.0008
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.002.0008
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.005.0001
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.002.0003
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.002.0004
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.002.0006
What is the IPCC’s assessment style and what shaped it?
Târziu, G. (2024) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.18095.1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lewandowsky, Stephan
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2012-10-28
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2089347171
- Semantic Scholar
- 74019f20176343c9d20dcffd389854d3a11c1f44
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 78.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- public acceptance of science, anthropogenic climate change, worldview, climate change concern, climate change skepticism, science communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review