The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In one experimental study, underscoring the consensus was particularly effective for people whose worldview otherwise might have predisposed them towards rejection of climate science [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Recent research has shown that the role of worldview may be attenuated by underscoring the breadth of consensus among scientists: When people are informed of the pervasive consensus about the fundamentals of climate change, they become more likely to endorse the basic premise of global warming, and they attribute a larger share of the observed warming trend to human CO2 emissions [37], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A further 3 items queried scientific propositions that were also used in previous research [27], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationThe role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves
Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02300 · Cited by 2,787
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.924 · Cited by 2,452
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Increase of extreme events in a warming world
Rahmstorf, S., & Coumou, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101766108 · Cited by 1,319
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221
Expert credibility in climate change
Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · Cited by 872
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 530
Analytic Thinking and Political Orientation in the Corona Crisis
Maglić, M., Pavlovic, T. M., & Franc, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631800 · Cited by 10
The Role of Late-Night Infotainment Comedy in Communicating Climate Change Consensus
Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A., Stevenson, J., & Kothe, E. J. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2032244 · Cited by 10
McCrea, R., Leviston, Z., Walker, I. A., & Shyy, T.-K. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.376 · Cited by 10
Enhancing endorsement of scientific inquiry increases support for pro-environment policies
Drummond, A., Palmer, M. A., & Sauer, J. D. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160360 · Cited by 11
Soliev, I., Janssen, M. A., Theesfeld, I., Pritchard, C., Pirscher, F., & Lee, A. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac30f7 · Cited by 11
Ramos, R., Vaz, P. M. F., & Rodrigues, M. J. (2025) · Psychology International · doi:10.3390/psycholint7010006 · Cited by 9
Rode, J. B., Remshard, M., Groot, L. J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101521 · Cited by 9
Logemann, H. T., Rode, J. B., Maertens, R., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70022 · Cited by 9
Future Actions towards Climate Change: The Role of Threat Perception and Emotions
Aguilar‐Luzón, M. D. C., Carmona, B., & Loureiro, A. (2023) · European Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p379 · Cited by 9
Ecology and Education in Marine Protected Areas: Insights from Brazil and South America
Berchez, F. A. D. S., Mansilla, A., Ghilardi-Lopes, N. P., Schwindt, E., Leite, K. L., & Rozzi, R. (2015) · Ecology and ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12133-8_23 · Cited by 9
Crowdsourcing effective educational interventionsPreprint
Priniski, J. H., & Horne, Z. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/edk3m · Cited by 9
Lohani, M., Velásquez‐Franco, S., Janney, B., & Zummo, L. (2025) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education · doi:10.29333/ijese/16618 · Cited by 8
Özkara, U., & Elmas, P. (2024) · Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi · doi:10.7816/nesne-12-33-04 · Cited by 8
Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
Vickers, P., Adamo, L., Alfano, M., Clark, C., Cresto, E., Cui, H., Dang, H., Dellsén, F., Dupin, N., Gradowski, L., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313541 · Cited by 8
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006221114132 · Cited by 8
Self-citationFu, H., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Tan, Y., He, W., & Zuo, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05675-1 · Cited by 7
Inoculating Adolescents Against Climate Change Misinformation
Schubatzky, T., & Haagen‐Schützenhöfer, C. (2023) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32225-9_17 · Cited by 8
Breaking the climate silence: Predictors of discussing global warming with family and friends
Orr, M., Borth, A. C., Kotcher, J., Campbell, E., Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. A., & Clarke, C. E. (2025) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000538 · Cited by 9
Samet, J. M., & Zhang, J. J. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315818719.ch20 · Cited by 7
Lindsey, R., Herring, D. D., & Greenhalgh, E. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1394659 · Cited by 7
Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos
Martín‐Sosa, S. (2021) · Communication & Methods · doi:10.35951/v3i1.111 · Cited by 12
Everuss, L., Carvalho, M., Casanova, J., Chaffee, D., & Lever‐Tracy, C. (2017) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783316684661 · Cited by 8
Rohring, E., & Akerlof, K. (2020) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01652-3 · Cited by 7
Stemming the Tide: Global Strategies for Sustaining Cultural Heritage through Climate Change
Rushfield, R. A. (2021) · Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press eBooks · doi:10.5479/si.14750727 · Cited by 7
Scientific consensus communication about contested science: A preregistered meta-analysisPreprint
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. ‘., & Buijzen, M. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/etsrw · Cited by 8
Source independence affects argument persuasiveness when the relevance is clearPreprint
Alister, M., Perfors, A., & Ransom, K. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5yx36 · Cited by 7
Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: A research agenda
Geiger, S. J., Imada, H., Maharja, C., Powdthavee, N., Vitale, V., Zhang, L., Rosa, C. D., Delabrida, Z. N. C., Nielsen, K. S., Essl, F., et al. (2025) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103043 · Cited by 6
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., & Scholfield, E. R. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00569-z · Cited by 9
Recalculating climate change consensus: The question of position and rhetoric
Jankó, F., Drüszler, Á., Gálos, B., Móricz, N., Vancsó, J. P., Pieczka, I., Pongrácz, R., Rasztovits, E., Dezső, Z., & Szabó, O. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120127 · Cited by 8
Stenhouse, N. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1289110 · Cited by 6
Scientific uncertainty in media content: Some reflections on this special issue
Griffin, R. J. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516674649 · Cited by 6
Spitz, A., Abu-Akel, A. M., & West, R. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450019 · Cited by 6
Gateway Illusion or Cultural Cognition Confusion?Preprint
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3094256 · Cited by 6
van der Does, T., Stein, D. L., Fedoroff, N. V., & Galešić, M. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zs7dq · Cited by 6
Promoting climate actions: A cognitive-constraints approach
Lee, J.-H., Wong, E., & Cheng, P. W. (2023) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101565 · Cited by 5
Yoo, S., Kumagai, J., Coulibaly, T. Y., & Managi, S. (2024) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105510 · Cited by 5
“Has the Climate Changed?”: How Education Shapes Beliefs in Emerging Scientific Phenomena
Ma, S., & Harris, P. L. (2025) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2025.2506066 · Cited by 5
Matthews, K. R. W., Lowe, S. J., & Master, Z. (2024) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.01.002 · Cited by 5
Climate Change Denialism: Science and Power Struggle in the Public Sphere
Bosco, E. M. G. R. L., Fetz, M., & de Souza, L. E. V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_332-1 · Cited by 5
Morin, D. (2018) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.17040202 · Cited by 5
Howell, E. L. (2020) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.f2823096 · Cited by 5
Philosophy’s other climate problem☆
Brownstein, M., & Levy, N. L. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12396 · Cited by 5
In Defense of “Targeting” Some Dissent about Science
Nash, E. J. (2018) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00277 · Cited by 5
The impact of controversy on the production of scientific knowledgePreprint
Sharman, A. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 5
Climate Literacy and Environmental Activism
Alkaher, I. (2020) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_139-1 · Cited by 5
Back to Bayesian: A strategy to enhance prognostication of metastatic spine disease
Pahuta, M. A., Werier, J. A., Wai, E. K., van Walraven, C., & Coyle, D. (2019) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.13322 · Cited by 4
Kohl, P. A., & Wardropper, C. B. (2022) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883 · Cited by 5
Subašić, M., Birch, S., Fagan, A., & Maltby, T. (2024) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2024.2346109 · Cited by 4
Clulow, Z., & Reiner, D. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310325 · Cited by 5
The Gateway Belief Model: A pre-registered large-scale replication in China
Zeng, Z., van Prooijen, J., Guo, Y., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102542 · Cited by 4
Do Source cues or frames matter? Convincing the public about the veracity of climate science
Gainous, J., Payne, R. A., & Merry, M. K. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13033 · Cited by 4
Cultural tightness does not predict action on the collective threat of climate change
Drummond, A., Hall, L. C., Palmer, M. A., Hughes, J. E., & Sauer, J. D. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00055-3 · Cited by 4
On the Conditional Acceptance of Arguments from Expert Opinion
Hornikx, J. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_18 · Cited by 4
Petit, J. D., Needham, M. D., & Howe, G. T. (2021) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1946628 · Cited by 4
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0007 · Cited by 4
Partisan biases in social information usePreprint
Molleman, L., Gradassi, A., Sultan, M., & van den Bos, W. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uctxa · Cited by 4
Efstratiou, A., & Caulfield, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.10594 · Cited by 4
Lede, E., Townsend, T., Nguyễn, Q. A., & Lede, E. (2024) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2024.2365287 · Cited by 3
The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale
Dash, S., Xu, Y., Jalbert, M. C., & Spiro, E. S. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf207 · Cited by 6
A relação entre linguagem e práticas pseudocientíficas
Bacchi, A. D., & Bacchi, B. S. (2023) · Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.17267/2675-021xevidence.2023.e4970 · Cited by 3
What To Do About Conspiracy Theories?
Drążkiewicz, E., & Harambam, J. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032647463 · Cited by 3
Gao, Y., Lau, J. T. F., Zhang, Q., Ming, W., Shen, F., Huang, Y. C., & Jiang, L. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2344283 · Cited by 3
The role of consensus messaging in teaching evolution
Korfmacher, I. M., Hammann, M., & Konnemann, C. (2024) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2400724 · Cited by 3
Pinardi, S., Salis, M., Sartor, G., & Meo, R. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12070398 · Cited by 4
Does it Harm Science to Suppress Dissenting Evidence?
Coates, M. (2024) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2024.21 · Cited by 3
Lep, Ž., Ilić, S., Teovanović, P., Beyazoglu, K. H., & Damnjanović, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791 · Cited by 3
What Should We Believe About Belief?
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0001 · Cited by 3
Nie, X., Wu, X., Wang, H., Kang, Q., Li, F., Li, L., & Qiao, H. (2023) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2023.2220334 · Cited by 3
Grofman, B., & Cervas, J. R. (2023) · Statistics and Public Policy · doi:10.1080/2330443x.2023.2289529 · Cited by 3
Lammers, J., & Crusius, J. (2024) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12392 · Cited by 3
CONSPIRACY BELIEF AND BEHAVIOR IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Ярош, Н. С., Artiukhova, V., & Zimovin, O. (2021) · BRAIN BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE · doi:10.18662/brain/12.2/200 · Cited by 3
Discussion: Making Sense of Public Sensemaking Relative to the COVID-19 Crisis
Bangerter, A. (2021) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x211045774 · Cited by 3
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0002 · Cited by 3
Wilke, A. K. (2013) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-4572 · Cited by 3
Cho, J., Cokely, E. T., Ramasubramanian, M., Allan, J. N., Feltz, A., & García‐Retamero, R. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-420681/v1 · Cited by 3
Hannah Arendt and the contemporary social construction of conspiracy theoristsPreprint
Lewandowsky, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fm8yg · Cited by 3
Self-citationHow to change people’s minds about climate change: what the science says
Soliman, A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-02777-9 · Cited by 3
Levy, N. (2021) · Bad Beliefs · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Mytych, J. (2024) · Quaestiones Geographicae · doi:10.14746/quageo-2024-0010 · Cited by 2
Schlaufer, C., Mavrot, C., Hornung, J., & Sager, F. (2025) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.70049 · Cited by 2
Kenix, L. J. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251366772 · Cited by 2
Public Health Communication Challenges in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Scoping Review
Lim, L., Mukasheva, A., Alegbe, A., Emehel, A. N., Aubakirova, B., & Semenova, Y. M. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph23010019 · Cited by 2
West, N. V., & Sirmon, D. G. (2026) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2024.0294 · Cited by 2
Caballero, M. F. M., & Palomeque-Forero, L. A. (2019) · Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales · doi:10.18257/raccefyn.904 · Cited by 2
Future directions for understanding the coevolution of life and oxygen
Alcott, L., Bowyer, F. T., & Agić, H. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02689-0 · Cited by 2
Nussbaum, E. M., Owens, M., & Cordova, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Education for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1177/0973408215625546 · Cited by 2
Crenças em Teorias da Conspiração: uma aproximação desde a Psicologia Social
Rezende, A. T., Gouveia, V. V., & Moizéis, H. B. C. (2021) · Interação em Psicologia · doi:10.5380/riep.v25i1.61173 · Cited by 4
Czarnek, G., & Kossowska, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296066 · Cited by 2
A decade of climate change concern in India: Determinants of personal and societal climate concern
Iyer, A., & Alphonsa Jose, K. (2024) · Environment and Social Psychology · doi:10.59429/esp.v9i8.2921 · Cited by 4
What about me? Factors affecting individual adaptive coping capacity across different populations
Unsworth, K. L., Russell, S. V., Lewandowsky, S., Lawrence, C. M., Fielding, K. S., Heath, J., Evans, A., Hurlstone, M. J., & Mcneill, I. (2013) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · Cited by 2
Self-citationMoral Agnosticism: An Ethics of Inquiry and Public Discourse
Torcello, L., & Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum (2014) · Teaching Ethics · doi:10.5840/tej20141422 · Cited by 2
Old Media, New Media, and Public Engagement With Science and Technology
Strekalova, Y. A., Krieger, J. L. R., Damiani, R. E., Kalyanaraman, S., & Wang, D. Z. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3929-2.ch025 · Cited by 2
The Use of Blockchain in Fighting Medical Misinformation: A Concept Paper
Stawicki, S. P., Firstenberg, M. S., & Papadimos, T. J. (2023) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14591-9_15 · Cited by 2
Old Media, New Media, and Public Engagement with Science and Technology
Strekalova, Y. A., Krieger, J. L. R., Damiani, R. E., Kalyanaraman, S., & Wang, D. Z. (2016) · Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1081-9.ch004 · Cited by 2
Visual Analytic Observatory of Scientific Knowledge
Chen, C., & Song, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62543-0_9 · Cited by 2
How Aesthetic Style Can Influence Reception of Visual Communications of Climate Change
Green, R. S. (2017) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_5 · Cited by 2
Caserini, S., Coyaud, S., Persico, G., & Messori, G. (2021) · Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.1080/16000870.2021.1875727 · Cited by 2
The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media
Chinn, S. (2020) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 2
Studying science denial with a complex problem-solving taskPreprint
Sulik, J., & McKay, R. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/huxm7 · Cited by 2
Why do we argue about science? Exploring the psychological antecedents of rejection of science
Kerr, J. R. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17142374 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lewandowsky, Stephan
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2012-10-28
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2089347171
- Semantic Scholar
- 74019f20176343c9d20dcffd389854d3a11c1f44
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 78.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- public acceptance of science, anthropogenic climate change, worldview, climate change concern, climate change skepticism, science communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review