Cited by 160Climate Change and GeoengineeringSocial Acceptance of Renewable EnergyAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project

Open access
Pidgeon, Nick, Parkhill, Karen, Corner, Adam, Vaughan, Naomi·2013·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate1807

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite fulfilling engagement and regulatory requirements, SPICE was canceled in 2012 following public controversy and disputes over undeclared intellectual property claims related to aerosol delivery technologies.

    “Despite fulfilling engagement and regulatory requirements, the project was canceled in 2012 following public controversy and disputes over undeclared intellectual property claims related to aerosol delivery technologies (Pidgeon et al., 2013).”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Pidgeon et al., 2013

    The Discussion reports that the SPICE test bed was cancelled in June 2012, primarily because of difficulties surrounding a patent application for the pipe technology. It also says the public-engagement criterion was met but not all other Stagegate criteria had been fulfilled. The paper describes public criticism, but does not identify it as a cause of cancellation or say the intellectual-property claims were undeclared; it does not establish that regulatory requirements were fulfilled. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SPICE highlighted uncertainties related to engineering scalability: performance from a 1 km testbed offered limited relevance to stratospheric conditions at an altitude of 18-20 km, where wind shear, temperature, and pressure differ substantially.

    “In its planned approach, SPICE highlighted uncertainties related to engineering scalability: performance from a 1 km testbed offered limited relevance to stratospheric conditions at an altitude of 18-20 km, where wind shear, temperature, and pressure differ substantially (Pidgeon et al., 2013).”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Pidgeon et al., 2013

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SPICE highlighted societal concerns that stratospheric aerosol research could undermine emissions reduction efforts and emphasized governance mechanisms to address public opposition.

    “SPICE highlighted societal concerns that stratospheric aerosol research could undermine emissions reduction efforts and emphasized governance mechanisms to address public opposition (Pidgeon et al., 2013).”
  • SPICE explicitly incorporated responsible innovation principles, including safety, regulatory compliance, transparency, and anticipatory governance.

    “Although technically focused and not a direct SRM experiment, SPICE also explicitly incorporated responsible innovation principles, including safety, regulatory compliance, transparency, and anticipatory governance (Pidgeon et al., 2013).”
  • SPICE would have provided limited insight into climate-relevant signals of SAI or the potential risks and scalability, limited to engineering challenges such as pipe stability.

    “As a result, it would have provided limited insight into climate-relevant signals of SAI or the potential risks and scalability (limited to engineering challenges such as pipe stability) (Pidgeon et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Royal Society Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. Science Policy Centre Report 10/09. (The Royal Society, 2009). Key first review of geoengineering proposals, their possible risks and uncertainties
  2. Dietz, T. & Stern, P. (ed.) Public Participation in Environmental Risk Assessment and Decision-Making. (National Academies Press, Washington 2008).
  3. Rip, A., Misa, T.J. & Schot, J. Managing Technology in Society: The Case of Constructive Technology Assessment (Pinter Press, 1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., Corner, A., & Vaughan, N.
Affiliations
  • Tyndall Centre (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Pidgeon, Nick
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2013-04-14
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
451-457
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2035854836
Cited by
160
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0938099)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I014721/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
stratospheric aerosol injection, geoengineering, public acceptance, citizen participation, SPICE project, field trials, ethics of geoengineering, responsible innovation, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review