Cited by 213Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Capture Hi-C reveals novel candidate genes and complex long-range interactions with related autoimmune risk loci

Open access
Martin, Paul, McGovern, Amanda, Orozco, Gisela, Duffus, Kate, Yarwood, Annie, Schoenfelder, Stefan, Cooper, Nicholas J., Barton, Anne +4 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have been tremendously successful in identifying genetic variants associated with complex diseases. The majority of association signals are intergenic and evidence is accumulating that a high proportion of signals lie in enhancer regions. We use Capture Hi-C to investigate, for the first time, the interactions between associated variants for four autoimmune diseases and their functional targets in B- and T-cell lines. Here we report numerous looping interactions and provide evidence that only a minority of interactions are common to both B- and T-cell lines, suggesting interactions may be highly cell-type specific; some disease-associated SNPs do not interact with the nearest gene but with more compelling candidate genes (for example, FOXO1, AZI2) often situated several megabases away; and finally, regions associated with different autoimmune diseases interact with each other and the same promoter suggesting common autoimmune gene targets (for example, PTPRC, DEXI and ZFP36L1).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms10069

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3C-derived methods have detected multitudes of enhancer-promoter loops in many human and mouse cell types.

    “These enrichment methods have detected multitudes of enhancer–promoter loops in many human and mouse cell types [243, 286–291].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [289]

    The Results (Summary of identified interactions; page unavailable) report thousands of Capture Hi-C interactions in two human cell lines, including some involving promoters. The paper does not establish that these are all enhancer–promoter loops, or report detection across many human and mouse cell types; its experiments used two human cell lines. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ward L. D. & Kellis M. Interpreting noncoding genetic variation in complex traits and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1095– 1106 (2012). 23138309 PMC3703467
  2. Fairfax B. P. et al. Innate immune activity conditions the effect of regulatory variants upon monocyte gene expression. Science 343, 1246949 (2014). 24604202 PMC4064786
  3. Farh K. K. et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518, 337– 343 (2015). 25363779 PMC4336207
  4. Ye C. J. et al. Intersection of population variation and autoimmunity genetics in human T cell activation. Science 345, 1254665 (2014). 25214635 PMC4751028
  5. Schoenfelder S., Clay I. & Fraser P. The transcriptional interactome: gene expression in 3D. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 127– 133 (2010). 20211559
  6. Dryden N. H. et al. Unbiased analysis of potential targets of breast cancer susceptibility loci by Capture Hi-C. Genome Res. 24, 1854– 1868 (2014). 25122612 PMC4216926
  7. Jager R. et al. Capture Hi-C identifies the chromatin interactome of colorectal cancer risk loci. Nat. Commun. 6, 6178 (2015). 25695508 PMC4346635
  8. Mifsud B. et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat. Genet. 47, 598– 606 (2015). 25938943
  9. Schoenfelder S. et al. The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements. Genome Res. 25, 582– 597 (2015). 25752748 PMC4381529
  10. Eyre S. et al. High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 44, 1336– 1340 (2012). 23143596 PMC3605761
  11. Okada Y. et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 506, 376– 381 (2014). 24390342 PMC3944098
  12. Bowes J. et al. Dense genotyping of immune-related susceptibility loci reveals new insights into the genetics of psoriatic arthritis. Nat. Commun. 6, 6046 (2015). 25651891 PMC4327416
  13. Hinks A. et al. Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies 14 new susceptibility loci for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Nat. Genet. 45, 664– 669 (2013). 23603761 PMC3673707
  14. Onengut-Gumuscu S. et al. Fine mapping of type 1 diabetes susceptibility loci and evidence for colocalization of causal variants with lymphoid gene enhancers. Nat. Genet. 47, 381– 386 (2015). 25751624 PMC4380767
  15. Belton J. M. et al. Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. Methods 58, 268– 276 (2012). 22652625 PMC3874846
  16. Grabiec A. M. et al. JNK-dependent downregulation of FoxO1 is required to promote the survival of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 1763– 1771 (2014). 24812285
  17. Nakano K., Whitaker J. W., Boyle D. L., Wang W. & Firestein G. S. DNA methylome signature in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 110– 117 (2013). 22736089 PMC3549371
  18. Davison L. J. et al. Long-range DNA looping and gene expression analyses identify DEXI as an autoimmune disease candidate gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 322– 333 (2012). 21989056 PMC3276289
  19. Rao S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665– 1680 (2014). 25497547 PMC5635824
  20. Schneider U., Schwenk H. U. & Bornkamm G. Characterization of EBV-genome negative ‘null' and ‘T' cell lines derived from children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and leukemic transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer 19, 621– 626 (1977). 68013
  21. van Berkum N. L. et al. Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J. Vis. Exp. 39, 1869 (2010). 20461051 PMC3149993
  22. Naumova N., Smith E. M., Zhan Y. & Dekker J. Analysis of long-range chromatin interactions using Chromosome Conformation Capture. Methods 58, 192– 203 (2012). 22903059 PMC3874837
  23. Zhou X. et al. The human epigenome browser at Washington University. Nat. Methods 8, 989– 990 (2011). 22127213 PMC3552640
  24. Zhou X. et al. Exploring long-range genome interactions using the WashU Epigenome Browser. Nat. Methods 10, 375– 376 (2013). 23629413 PMC3820286

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, P., McGovern, A., Orozco, G., Duffus, K., Yarwood, A., Schoenfelder, S., Cooper, N. J., Barton, A., Wallace, C., Fraser, P., Worthington, J., & Eyre, S.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • Babraham Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-11-30
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
10069-10069
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2182733429
Cited by
213
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (FP7/2007–2013, AM 095684, 091157, 089989, 095684, 100140, 097820/Z11/B, 097820, 089989/Z/09/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (20385, FP7/2007–2013, MANMKBRU-2012-1)
  • University of Manchester
  • European Commission (241447, 2007–2013, 115142, 305549, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (20385, 115142, FP7/2007‐2013)
  • Versus Arthritis (20385, 20571)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/B/000C0405, BBS/E/B/000C0404)
  • Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge (100140)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • FP7 Health (FP7-HEALTH-F2-2012-305549, FP7/2007-2013, 2012-305549)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
Capture Hi-C, long-range chromatin interactions, enhancer looping, candidate genes, cell type specificity, B-cell lines, T cell lines, FOXO1, CD45, DEXi, ZFP36L1, disease-associated SNPs, promoter interactions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autoimmune Diseases, B-Lymphocytes, Female, Humans, Male, Promoter Regions, Genetic, T-Lymphocytes, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review