Cited by 80Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Chromosome contacts in activated T cells identify autoimmune disease candidate genes

Open access
Burren, Oliver S., Rubio García, Arcadio, Javierre, Biola-Maria, Rainbow, Daniel B., Cairns, Jonathan, Cooper, Nicholas J., Lambourne, John J., Schofield, Ellen +15 more·2017·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: T cells. Linking such regulatory regions to gene promoters in disease-relevant cell contexts facilitates identification of candidate disease genes. RESULTS: T cells invokes changes in histone modifications and enhancer RNA transcription that correspond to altered expression of the interacting genes identified by promoter capture Hi-C. By integrating promoter capture Hi-C data with genetic associations for five autoimmune diseases, we prioritised 245 candidate genes with a median distance from peak signal to prioritised gene of 153 kb. Just under half (108/245) prioritised genes related to activation-sensitive interactions. This included IL2RA, where allele-specific expression analyses were consistent with its interaction-mediated regulation, illustrating the utility of the approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic experimental framework offers an alternative approach to candidate causal gene identification for variants with cell state-specific functional effects, with achievable sample sizes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-017-1285-0

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variants associated with type 1 diabetes were strongly enriched at promoter-connected active enhancers in activated, compared with resting, CD4+ T cells.

    “Likewise, variants associated with type 1 diabetes were strongly enriched at promoter-connected active enhancers in activated, compared with resting, CD4+ T cells [229].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [229]

    The Results section (‘PCHi-C-facilitated mapping of candidate disease-causal genes’; page unavailable) reports overlap between fine-mapped autoimmune-disease variants and expressed enhancer RNAs at promoter-interacting regions. The paper also compares activated and non-activated CD4+ T cells, but the passages available do not establish that type 1 diabetes variants were strongly enriched at those enhancers in activated cells relative to resting cells. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [69]Li H Durbin R Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform Bioinformatics. 2010 26 589 95 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 20080505 PMC2828108 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burren, O. S., Rubio García, A., Javierre, B.-M., Rainbow, D. B., Cairns, J., Cooper, N. J., Lambourne, J. J., Schofield, E., Castro Dopico, X., Ferreira, R. C., Coulson, R., Burden, F., Rowlston, S. P., Downes, K., Wingett, S. W., Frontini, M., Ouwehand, W. H., Fraser, P., Spivakov, M., Todd, J. A., Wicker, L. S., Cutler, A. J., & Wallace, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Babraham Institute (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Chris
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2017-09-04
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
165-165
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2949341516
Cited by
80
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • JDRF (US) (9-2011-253)
  • Wellcome Trust (089989, 091157, 107881, 100140)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L007150/1, MC_UP_1302/5)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004480/)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
T cell activation, promoter capture Hi-C, enhancer-promoter interactions, histone modifications, enhancer RNA, allele-specific expression, IL2RA, causal gene prioritization
MeSH terms
Autoimmune Diseases, Chromatin, Chromosome Mapping, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review