The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness
Open accessAbstract
Identifying influential nodes in dynamical processes is crucial in understanding network structure and function. Degree, H-index and coreness are widely used metrics, but previously treated as unrelated. Here we show their relation by constructing an operator "Equation missing", in terms of which degree, H-index and coreness are the initial, intermediate and steady states of the sequences, respectively. We obtain a family of H-indices that can be used to measure a node’s importance. We also prove that the convergence to coreness can be guaranteed even under an asynchronous updating process, allowing a decentralized local method of calculating a node’s coreness in large-scale evolving networks. Numerical analyses of the susceptible-infected-removed spreading dynamics on disparate real networks suggest that the H-index is a good tradeoff that in many cases can better quantify node influence than either degree or coreness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Epidemic processes in complex networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P., & Vespignani, A. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925 · Cited by 3,697
Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches
Alon, U. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2102 · Cited by 3,279
Cited by
Dynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks
Zhang, Z.-K., Liu, C., Zhan, X.-X., Lu, X., Zhang, C.-X., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002 · Cited by 484
Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks
Zhang, J.-X., Chen, D.-B., Dong, Q., & Zhao, Z.-D. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27823 · Cited by 320
Coevolution spreading in complex networks
Wang, W., Liu, Q.-H., Liang, J., Hu, Y., & Zhou, T. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.07.001 · Cited by 286
Self-citationIdentifying influential spreaders by gravity model
Li, Z., Ren, T., Ma, X., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44930-9 · Cited by 256
Self-citationAlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics
Guo, H.-B., Perminov, A., Bekele, S., Kedziora, G., Farajollahi, S., Varaljay, V., Hinkle, K., Molinero, V., Meister, K., Hung, C., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Lü, L., Zhou, T., Zhang, Q.-M., & Stanley, H. E.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2016-01-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10168-10168
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2261717057
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
