CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,035Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsAdvanced Materials and MechanicsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Skin-inspired hydrogel–elastomer hybrids with robust interfaces and functional microstructures

Open access
Yuk, Hyunwoo, Zhang, Teng, Parada, German Alberto, Liu, Xinyue, Zhao, Xuanhe·2016·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12028PMC PMC4931236
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Inspired by mammalian skins, soft hybrids integrating the merits of elastomers and hydrogels have potential applications in diverse areas including stretchable and bio-integrated electronics, microfluidics, tissue engineering, soft robotics and biomedical devices. However, existing hydrogel–elastomer hybrids have limitations such as weak interfacial bonding, low robustness and difficulties in patterning microstructures. Here, we report a simple yet versatile method to assemble hydrogels and elastomers into hybrids with extremely robust interfaces (interfacial toughness over 1,000 Jm −2 ) and functional microstructures such as microfluidic channels and electrical circuits. The proposed method is generally applicable to various types of tough hydrogels and diverse commonly used elastomers including polydimethylsiloxane Sylgard 184, polyurethane, latex, VHB and Ecoflex. We further demonstrate applications enabled by the robust and microstructured hydrogel–elastomer hybrids including anti-dehydration hydrogel–elastomer hybrids, stretchable and reactive hydrogel–elastomer microfluidics, and stretchable hydrogel circuit boards patterned on elastomer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms12028

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the fabrication of robust microstructured hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) The hybrids are formed by bonding tough hydrogels of interpenetrating polymer networks with elastomers. One polymer network of the hydrogel is first physically crosslinked, while infiltrated with monomer/macromonomer solution of the other polymer network. The physical crosslinking sets the shape and microstructures of the hydrogel. (b) The surface of a cured elastomer with patterned microstructures is treated with benzophenone. (c) The pre-shaped hydrogel and elastomer are assembled together followed by ultraviolet irradiation to chemically crosslink the other polymer network in the hydrogel. (d) After ultraviolet irradiation, the resultant hydrogel–elastomer hybrid forms extremely robust interfaces due to the covalently anchored polymer network in the hydrogel on elastomer surface. The pre-patterned microstructures in elastomers and hydrogels are also preserved in the hybrid. The hybrids can be highly stretched without interfacial failure.
Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the fabrication of robust microstructured hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) The hybrids are formed by bonding tough hydrogels of interpenetrating polymer networks with elastomers. One polymer network of the hydrogel is first physically crosslinked, while infiltrated with monomer/macromonomer solution of the other polymer network. The physical crosslinking sets the shape and microstructures of the hydrogel. (b) The surface of a cured elastomer with patterned microstructures is treated with benzophenone. (c) The pre-shaped hydrogel and elastomer are assembled together followed by ultraviolet irradiation to chemically crosslink the other polymer network in the hydrogel. (d) After ultraviolet irradiation, the resultant hydrogel–elastomer hybrid forms extremely robust interfaces due to the covalently anchored polymer network in the hydrogel on elastomer surface. The pre-patterned microstructures in elastomers and hydrogels are also preserved in the hybrid. The hybrids can be highly stretched without interfacial failure.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Experimental and simulation results of 90°-peeling tests on hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) Schematic illustration of the 90°-peeling test (ASTM D 2861) on various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. A stiff backing is introduced to prevent elongation of hydrogel sheet along the peeling direction. (b) Photos of the hydrogel–elastomer interface during peeling test. The tough hydrogel undergoes a cohesive failure during the peeling test, leaving a thin residual layer of hydrogel ∼0.2 mm on the elastomer substrates. (c) The measured peeling forces per width of the hydrogel sheets for various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids (in as-prepared state). (d) The calculated peeling forces per width of the hydrogel sheets for various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids in finite-element simulation. The simulated interfacial toughness is significantly decreased as dissipative properties is eliminated in the hydrogel (that is, without Mullins effect) while maintaining other parameters the same. Note that inset pictures are snapshots of the 90°-peeling simulation. The contours indicate the energy dissipation per unit area in the material. (e) Summary of measured interfacial toughness of various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids using the proposed method at both as-prepared and fully swollen states. Values in e represent mean and the error bars represent the s.d. of measured interfacial toughness for each elastomer materials (n=3–5).
Figure 2 Experimental and simulation results of 90°-peeling tests on hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) Schematic illustration of the 90°-peeling test (ASTM D 2861) on various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. A stiff backing is introduced to prevent elongation of hydrogel sheet along the peeling direction. (b) Photos of the hydrogel–elastomer interface during peeling test. The tough hydrogel undergoes a cohesive failure during the peeling test, leaving a thin residual layer of hydrogel ∼0.2 mm on the elastomer substrates. (c) The measured peeling forces per width of the hydrogel sheets for various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids (in as-prepared state). (d) The calculated peeling forces per width of the hydrogel sheets for various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids in finite-element simulation. The simulated interfacial toughness is significantly decreased as dissipative properties is eliminated in the hydrogel (that is, without Mullins effect) while maintaining other parameters the same. Note that inset pictures are snapshots of the 90°-peeling simulation. The contours indicate the energy dissipation per unit area in the material. (e) Summary of measured interfacial toughness of various hydrogel–elastomer hybrids using the proposed method at both as-prepared and fully swollen states. Values in e represent mean and the error bars represent the s.d. of measured interfacial toughness for each elastomer materials (n=3–5).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Hydrogel–elastomer hybrids under uniaxial stretches. (a) PAAm-alginate hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer using the proposed method can withstand large deformation (stretch ∼7) without debonding. The robust hydrogel–elastomer bonding is intact even after fracture of the hybrid. (b) PAAm-alginate hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer untreated by benzophenone detaches from the elastomer under small deformation (that is, stretch ∼1.1) due to weak adhesion. (c) PAAm hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer using the proposed method fails under large deformation (stretch ∼4) due to crack propagation in the brittle bulk PAAm hydrogel. Note that red food dyes are added into the hydrogels to enhance the contrast between hydrogels and elastomers.
Figure 3 Hydrogel–elastomer hybrids under uniaxial stretches. (a) PAAm-alginate hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer using the proposed method can withstand large deformation (stretch ∼7) without debonding. The robust hydrogel–elastomer bonding is intact even after fracture of the hybrid. (b) PAAm-alginate hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer untreated by benzophenone detaches from the elastomer under small deformation (that is, stretch ∼1.1) due to weak adhesion. (c) PAAm hydrogel bonded on Ecoflex elastomer using the proposed method fails under large deformation (stretch ∼4) due to crack propagation in the brittle bulk PAAm hydrogel. Note that red food dyes are added into the hydrogels to enhance the contrast between hydrogels and elastomers.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Anti-dehydration hydrogel–elastomer hybrid. (a) Schematic illustration of the anti-dehydration elastomeric coating for hydrogels. A very thin layer of Ecoflex elastomer robustly bonded to the hydrogel can effectively prevent evaporation of water from the hydrogel. (b) The hydrogel–elastomer hybrid does not show noticeable change in its weight under the ambient testing conditions (24 °C and 50% humidity) for 48 h; whereas hydrogel without elastomeric coating loses most of its water content after 48 h. (c) Snapshots of the hydrogel–elastomer hybrid and hydrogel during the dehydration experiments. Scale bar, 10 mm (c).
Figure 4 Anti-dehydration hydrogel–elastomer hybrid. (a) Schematic illustration of the anti-dehydration elastomeric coating for hydrogels. A very thin layer of Ecoflex elastomer robustly bonded to the hydrogel can effectively prevent evaporation of water from the hydrogel. (b) The hydrogel–elastomer hybrid does not show noticeable change in its weight under the ambient testing conditions (24 °C and 50% humidity) for 48 h; whereas hydrogel without elastomeric coating loses most of its water content after 48 h. (c) Snapshots of the hydrogel–elastomer hybrid and hydrogel during the dehydration experiments. Scale bar, 10 mm (c).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Stretchable diffusive and reactive microfluidic chips based on hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication procedure for hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic chip. (b) The resultant hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid supports convection of chemicals (represented by food dye in different colours) in the microfluidic channels and diffusion of chemicals in the hydrogel. (c) The hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid can maintain functionality under large deformation (for example, stretch ∼2) without debonding failure or leakage thanks to the robust interfacial bonding. (d) The hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid can be used as a platform for diffusion-reaction study. Acid (pH ∼3) and base (pH ∼10) solutions from two microfluidic channels diffuse in the pH-sensitive hydrogel and form regions of different colours (light red for acid and dark violet for base). The reaction of acid and base solutions in the hydrogel further form a neutral region (pH ∼7, light green colour). Scale bars, 10 mm (b–d).
Figure 5 Stretchable diffusive and reactive microfluidic chips based on hydrogel–elastomer hybrids. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication procedure for hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic chip. (b) The resultant hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid supports convection of chemicals (represented by food dye in different colours) in the microfluidic channels and diffusion of chemicals in the hydrogel. (c) The hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid can maintain functionality under large deformation (for example, stretch ∼2) without debonding failure or leakage thanks to the robust interfacial bonding. (d) The hydrogel–elastomer microfluidic hybrid can be used as a platform for diffusion-reaction study. Acid (pH ∼3) and base (pH ∼10) solutions from two microfluidic channels diffuse in the pH-sensitive hydrogel and form regions of different colours (light red for acid and dark violet for base). The reaction of acid and base solutions in the hydrogel further form a neutral region (pH ∼7, light green colour). Scale bars, 10 mm (b–d).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Stretchable hydrogel circuit board patterned on elastomer. (a) Schematic illustration of fabrication procedure for conductive hydrogel circuit patterned on flexible elastomer substrate. (b) Ionically conductive PAAm-alginate hydrogel circuit bonded on an Ecoflex elastomer substrate using the proposed method is robust under large deformation without visible failure. (c) The hydrogel circuit board connected with an AC power source can light up LED, and it can maintain its electrical functionality even under severe deformation. (d) A hydrogel circuit bonded on Ecoflex elastomer without benzophenone treatment delaminates and fails under deformation, due to the weak hydrogel–elastomer bonding. Scale bars, 10 mm (b–d).
Figure 6 Stretchable hydrogel circuit board patterned on elastomer. (a) Schematic illustration of fabrication procedure for conductive hydrogel circuit patterned on flexible elastomer substrate. (b) Ionically conductive PAAm-alginate hydrogel circuit bonded on an Ecoflex elastomer substrate using the proposed method is robust under large deformation without visible failure. (c) The hydrogel circuit board connected with an AC power source can light up LED, and it can maintain its electrical functionality even under severe deformation. (d) A hydrogel circuit bonded on Ecoflex elastomer without benzophenone treatment delaminates and fails under deformation, due to the weak hydrogel–elastomer bonding. Scale bars, 10 mm (b–d).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Parada, G. A., Liu, X., & Zhao, X.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Xuanhe
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
12028-12028
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/ncomms12028
PMC
PMC4931236
OpenAlex
W2461891321
Cited by
1,035
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 5
FWCI
35.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1253495)
  • Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
  • National Institutes of Health (UH3TR000505)
  • Samsung
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014‐14‐1‐0528, N00014)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI-1253495)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
interfacial bonding, interfacial toughness, micropatterning, microfluidic channels, stretchable electronics, stretchable circuits, polydimethylsiloxane, polyurethane, LaTeX, Ecoflex, soft robotics, bio-integrated electronics
MeSH terms
Chemical Engineering, Materials Testing, Surface Properties, Hydrogels, Elastomers, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review