The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TP53 mutations emerge with HDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 treatment in de-differentiated liposarcoma
Abstract
In tumours that harbour wild-type p53, p53 protein function is frequently disabled by the mouse double minute 2 protein (MDM2, or HDM2 in humans). Multiple HDM2 antagonists are currently in clinical development. Preclinical data indicate that TP53 mutations are a possible mechanism of acquired resistance to HDM2 inhibition; however, this resistance mechanism has not been reported in patients. Utilizing liquid biopsies, here we demonstrate that TP53 mutations appear in circulating cell-free DNA obtained from patients with de-differentiated liposarcoma being treated with an inhibitor of the HDM2–p53 interaction (SAR405838). TP53 mutation burden increases over time and correlates with change in tumour size, likely representing selection of TP53 mutant clones resistant to HDM2 inhibition. These results provide the first clinical demonstration of the emergence of TP53 mutations in response to an HDM2 antagonist and have significant implications for the clinical development of this class of molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, an increase in TP53 mutation burden—likely from minor pre‐existing mutant clones—was observed weeks into clinical trials of MDM2 antagonists, correlating with resistance and limited clinical response [113, 114].”
From The TP53 tumor suppressor gene: From molecular biology to clinical investigations (2025) · cites this paper as [114]
In the citing paper
“The safety of SAR405838 alone355 or in combination with MEK inhibitors356 has been established, but the drug activity is limited, and TP53 mutations may occur with long-term administration.357”
From Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [357]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing
Ding, L., Ley, T. J., Larson, D. E., Miller, C. A., Koboldt, D. C., Welch, J. S., Ritchey, J. K., Young, M. A., Lamprecht, T., McLellan, M. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10738 · Cited by 1,993
Role of TP53 mutations in the origin and evolution of therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia
Wong, T. N., Ramsingh, G., Young, A. L., Miller, C. A., Touma, W., Welch, J. S., Lamprecht, T. L., Shen, D., Hundal, J., Fulton, R. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13968 · Cited by 892
Michaelis, M., Rothweiler, F., Barth, S., Cinatl, J., van Rikxoort, M., Löschmann, N., Voges, Y., Breitling, R., von Deimling, A., Rödel, F., et al. (2011) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2011.129 · Cited by 190
Acquisition of p53 mutations in response to the non-genotoxic p53 activator Nutlin-3
Aziz, M. H., Shen, H., & Maki, C. G. (2011) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.185 · Cited by 131
Saiki, A. Y., Caenepeel, S., Yu, D., Lofgren, J. A., Osgood, T., Robertson, R., Canon, J., Su, C., Jones, A., Zhao, X., et al. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1918 · Cited by 55
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Hainaut, P. & Hollstein, M. p53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations. Adv. Cancer. Res. 77, 81–137 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- Muller, P. A. & Vousden, K. H. p53 mutations in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 2–8 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, X., Bayle, J. H., Olson, D. & Levine, A. J. The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes. Dev. 7, 1126–1132 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
- Jones, R. J., Bjorklund, C. C., Baladandayuthapani, V., Kuhn, D. J. & Orlowski, R. Z. Drug resistance to inhibitors of the human double minute-2 E3 ligase is mediated by point mutations of p53, but can be overcome with the p53 targeting agent RITA. Mol. Cancer Ther. 11, 2243–2253 (2012). · DOI
- Hoffman-Luca, C. G. et al. Significant differences in the development of acquired resistance to the MDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 between in vitro and in vivo drug treatment. PLoS ONE 10, e0128807 (2015). · DOI
- de Weger, V. A. et al. 378A first-in-human (FIH) safety and pharmacological study of SAR405838, a novel HDM2 antagonist, in patients with solid malignancies. Eur. J. Cancer 50, 121–122 (2014). · DOI
- Diaz, L. A. Jr & Bardelli, A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 579–586 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Heitzer, E., Ulz, P. & Geigl, J. B. Circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy for cancer. Clin. Chem. 61, 112–123 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Ramos, A. H. et al. Oncotator: cancer variant annotation tool. Hum. Mutat. 36, E2423–E2429 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Saddler, C. et al. Comprehensive biomarker and genomic analysis identifies p53 status as the major determinant of response to MDM2 inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 111, 1584–1593 (2008). · DOI
- Zawacka-Pankau, J. & Selivanova, G. Pharmacological reactivation of p53 as a strategy to treat cancer. J. Intern. Med. 277, 248–259 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Saunders, C. T. et al. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics 28, 1811–1817 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Zanetti-Dallenbach, R. et al. Positive correlation of cell-free DNA in plasma/serum in patients with malignant and benign breast disease. Anticancer Res. 28, 921–925 (2008).
- Mose, L. E., Wilkerson, M. D., Hayes, D. N., Perou, C. M. & Parker, J. S. ABRA: improved coding indel detection via assembly-based realignment. Bioinformatics 30, 2813–2815 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Wilm, A. et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11189–11201 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Ye, K., Schulz, M. H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R. & Ning, Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics 25, 2865–2871 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- James, T. Robinson et al. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy
Wang, H., Guo, M., Wei, H., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01347-1 · Cited by 1,016
Gluck, W. L., Gounder, M. M., Frank, R., Eskens, F., Blay, J. Y., Cassier, P. A., Soria, J.-C., Chawla, S., de Weger, V., Wagner, A. J., et al. (2020) · Investigational New Drugs · doi:10.1007/s10637-019-00840-1 · Cited by 127
Self-citationBerberich, A., Kessler, T., Thomé, C. M., Pusch, S., Hielscher, T., Sahm, F., Oezen, I., Schmitt, L.-M., Ciprut, S., Hucke, N., et al. (2019) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1580 · Cited by 75
Liao, G., Yang, D., Ma, L., Li, W., Hu, L., Zeng, L., Wu, P., Duan, L., & Liu, Z. (2018) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.044 · Cited by 63
de Weger, V. A., de Jonge, M., Langenberg, M. H. G., Schellens, J. H. M., Lolkema, M., Varga, A., Demers, B., Thomas, K., Hsu, K., Tuffal, G., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0355-8 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, J., Lee, J. S., Dickson, M. A., Schwartz, G. K., Le Cesne, A., Varga, A., Bahleda, R., Wagner, A. J., Choy, E., de Jonge, M. J., Light, M., Rowley, S., Macé, S., & Watters, J.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2016-08-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2041-1723
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
