Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synthesis of single-crystal-like nanoporous carbon membranes and their application in overall water splitting

Open access
Wang, Hong, Min, Shixiong, Ma, Chun, Liu, Zhixiong, Zhang, Weiyi, Wang, Qiang, Li, Debao, Li, Yangyang, Turner, Stuart, Han, Yu, Zhu, Haibo, Abou-hamad, Edy, Hedhili, Mohamed Nejib, Pan, Jun, Yu, Weili, Huang, Kuo-Wei, Li, Lain-Jong, Yuan, Jiayin, Antonietti, Markus, Wu, Tom·2017·Nature Communications

Abstract

Nanoporous graphitic carbon membranes with defined chemical composition and pore architecture are novel nanomaterials that are actively pursued. Compared with easy-to-make porous carbon powders that dominate the porous carbon research and applications in energy generation/conversion and environmental remediation, porous carbon membranes are synthetically more challenging though rather appealing from an application perspective due to their structural integrity, interconnectivity and purity. Here we report a simple bottom–up approach to fabricate large-size, freestanding and porous carbon membranes that feature an unusual single-crystal-like graphitic order and hierarchical pore architecture plus favourable nitrogen doping. When loaded with cobalt nanoparticles, such carbon membranes serve as high-performance carbon-based non-noble metal electrocatalyst for overall water splitting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms13592

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Min, S., Ma, C., Liu, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, Q., Li, D., Li, Y., Turner, S., Han, Y., Zhu, H., Abou-hamad, E., Hedhili, M. N., Pan, J., Yu, W., Huang, K.-W., Li, L.-J., Yuan, J., Antonietti, M., & Wu, T.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
13592-13592
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568140456
Cited by
176
References
12
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.