Cited by 556Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Mechanistic Insights on Ternary Ni2−xCoxP for Hydrogen Evolution and Their Hybrids with Graphene as Highly Efficient and Robust Catalysts for Overall Water Splitting

Li, Jiayuan, Yan, Ming, Zhou, Xuemei, Huang, Zheng‐Qing, Xia, Zhaoming, Chang, Chun‐Ran, Ma, Yuanyuan, Qu, Yongquan·2016·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Searching the high‐efficient, stable, and earth‐abundant electrocatalysts to replace the precious noble metals holds the promise for practical utilizations of hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions (HER and OER). Here, a series of highly active and robust Co‐doped nickel phosphides (Ni2−xCoxP) catalysts and their hybrids with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are developed as bifunctional catalysts for both HER and OER. The Co‐doping in Ni2P and their hybridization with rGO effectively regulate the catalytic activity of the surface active sites, accelerate the charge transfer, and boost their superior catalytic activity. Density functional theory calculations show that the Co‐doped catalysts deliver the moderate trapping of atomic hydrogen and facile desorption of the generated H2 due to the H‐poisoned surface active sites of Ni2−xCoxP under the real catalytic process. Electrochemical measurements reveal the high HER efficiency and durability of the NiCoP/rGO hybrids in electrolytes with pH 0–14. Coupled with the remarkable and robust OER activity of the NiCoP/rGO hybrids, the practical utilization of the NiCoP/rGO‖NiCoP/rGO for overall water splitting yields a catalytic current density of 10 mA cm−2 at 1.59 V over 75 h without an obvious degradation and Faradic efficiency of ≈100% in a two‐electrode configuration and 1.0 m KOH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201601420

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Yan, M., Zhou, X., Huang, Z., Xia, Z., Chang, C., Ma, Y., & Qu, Y.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chang, Chun‐Ran
  • Ma, Yuanyuan
  • Qu, Yongquan
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
26
Issue
37
Pages
6785-6796
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2490669091
Cited by
556
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 5
FWCI
24.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21401148, 21201138, 21543005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
nickel phosphide, reduced graphene oxide, bifunctional electrocatalysts, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, overall water splitting, charge transfer, noble-metal-free electrocatalysts, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review