Cited by 115Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Insight into the early evolution of the avian sternum from juvenile enantiornithines

Open access
Zheng, Xiaoting, Wang, Xiaoli, O'Connor, Jingmai, Zhou, Zhonghe·2012·Nature Communications

Abstract

The sternum is one of the most important and characteristic skeletal elements in living birds, highly adapted for flight and showing a diverse range of morphologies. New exceptional material of young juvenile specimens from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Group in northeastern China reveals the unique sequence of development in the sternum of Enantiornithes, the dominant clade of Cretaceous birds. We recognize six ossifications that together form the sternum, three of which were previously unknown. Here we show that although basal living birds apparently have retained the dinosaurian condition in which the sternum develops from a bilateral pair of ossifications (present in paravian dinosaurs and basal birds), the enantiornithine sternal body primarily develops from two unilateral proximo-distally arranged ossifications. This indicates that although superficially similar, the sternum formed very differently in enantiornithines and ornithuromorphs, suggesting that several ornithothoracine sternal features may represent parallelism. This highlights the importance of ontogenetic studies for understanding homology and the evolution of skeletal features in palaeontology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2104

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The origin of the modern flight feather is coincident with the inferred origin of multiple flight-related features, such as the alula and an ossified sternal keel.

    “The origin of the modern flight feather-characterized by small barb angles in cutting-edge vanes and larger barb angles in trailing vanes-is coincident with the inferred origin of multiple flight-related features, such as the alula and an ossified sternal keel [40,41].”

    From Barb geometry of asymmetrical feathers reveals a transitional morphology in the evolution of avian flight (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

    The introduction states that a projecting sternal keel appears in Ornithothoraces, supporting the claim’s keel component. The paper does not compare the keel’s inferred origin with the origin of modern flight feathers or the alula, so it does not establish the claimed coincidence. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The origin of the modern flight feather is coincident with the inferred origin of multiple flight-related features, such as the alula and an ossified sternal keel.

    “The origin of the modern flight feather-characterized by small barb angles in cutting-edge vanes and larger barb angles in trailing vanes-is coincident with the inferred origin of multiple flight-related features, such as the alula and an ossified sternal keel [40,41].”

    From Barb geometry of asymmetrical feathers reveals a transitional morphology in the evolution of avian flight (2015) · cites this paper as [40]

    The introductory passage (page unavailable) places the appearance of a projecting sternal keel in Ornithothoraces, supporting the cited paper’s role as evidence for that flight-related feature. It does not address the origin of modern flight feathers or the alula, or establish that their origins coincided with the keel’s. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]22. O'Connor, J. K. A systematic review of Enantiornithes (Aves: Ornithothoraces) (University of Southern California, 2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, X., Wang, X., O'Connor, J., & Zhou, Z.
Affiliations
  • Linyi University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
O'Connor, Jingmai
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2012-10-09
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1116-1116
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156664741
Cited by
115
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (973 Program, 41102009, 41172016, 41172020, 2012CB821906)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2012CB821906, 973 Program, 2012CB821906)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Enantiornithes, juvenile birds, ossification sequence, ontogeny, Early Cretaceous birds, Jehol Group, homology, parallel evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, China, Biological Evolution, Paleontology, Sternum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review