Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genetic prehistory of southern Africa

Open access
Pickrell, Joseph K., Patterson, Nick, Barbieri, Chiara, Berthold, Falko, Gerlach, Linda, Güldemann, Tom, Kure, Blesswell, Mpoloka, Sununguko Wata, Nakagawa, Hirosi, Naumann, Christfried, Lipson, Mark, Loh, Po-Ru, Lachance, Joseph, Mountain, Joanna, Bustamante, Carlos D., Berger, Bonnie, Tishkoff, Sarah A., Henn, Brenna M., Stoneking, Mark, Reich, David, Pakendorf, Brigitte·2012·Nature Communications

Abstract

Southern and eastern African populations that speak non-Bantu languages with click consonants are known to harbour some of the most ancient genetic lineages in humans, but their relationships are poorly understood. Here, we report data from 23 populations analysed at over half a million single-nucleotide polymorphisms, using a genome-wide array designed for studying human history. The southern African Khoisan fall into two genetic groups, loosely corresponding to the northwestern and southeastern Kalahari, which we show separated within the last 30,000 years. We find that all individuals derive at least a few percent of their genomes from admixture with non-Khoisan populations that began ∼1,200 years ago. In addition, the East African Hadza and Sandawe derive a fraction of their ancestry from admixture with a population related to the Khoisan, supporting the hypothesis of an ancient link between southern and eastern Africa. Hunter-gatherer populations in Africa preserve unique information about human history, but genetic sub-structures of these populations remain unclear. Using newly designed microarray and statistical methods, these authors analyse genetic compositions of southern African populations and reveal an ancient link between southern and eastern Africa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2140

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Pickrell, J. K., Patterson, N., Barbieri, C., Berthold, F., Gerlach, L., Güldemann, T., Kure, B., Mpoloka, S. W., Nakagawa, H., Naumann, C., Lipson, M., Loh, P.-R., Lachance, J., Mountain, J., Bustamante, C. D., Berger, B., Tishkoff, S. A., Henn, B. M., Stoneking, M., Reich, D., & Pakendorf, B.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2012-10-16
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1143-1143
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100196176
Cited by
347
References
58
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genetic prehistory of southern Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms2140
The paper
Pickrell, J. K., Patterson, N., Barbieri, C., Berthold, F., Gerlach, L., Güldemann, T., Kure, B., Mpoloka, S. W., Nakagawa, H., Naumann, C., Lipson, M., Loh, P.-R., Lachance, J., Mountain, J., Bustamante, C. D., Berger, B., Tishkoff, S. A., Henn, B. M., Stoneking, M., . . . Pakendorf, B. (2012). The genetic prehistory of southern Africa. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.