The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MacroH2A histone variants act as a barrier upon reprogramming towards pluripotency
Open accessAbstract
The chromatin template imposes an epigenetic barrier during the process of somatic cell reprogramming. Using fibroblasts derived from macroH2A double knockout (dKO) mice, here we show that these histone variants act cooperatively as a barrier to induced pluripotency. Through manipulation of macroH2A isoforms, we further demonstrate that macroH2A2 is the predominant barrier to reprogramming. Genomic analyses reveal that macroH2A1 and macroH2A2, together with H3K27me3, co-occupy pluripotency genes in wild-type (wt) fibroblasts. In particular, we find macroH2A isoforms to be highly enriched at target genes of the K27me3 demethylase, Utx, which are reactivated early in iPS reprogramming. Finally, while macroH2A dKO-induced pluripotent cells are able to differentiate properly in vitro and in vivo, such differentiated cells retain the ability to return to a stem-like state. Therefore, we propose that macroH2A isoforms provide a redundant silencing layer or terminal differentiation ‘lock’ at critical pluripotency genes that presents as an epigenetic barrier when differentiated cells are challenged to reprogram. Chromatin templates can act as barriers against cellular reprogramming. Gaspar-Maia and colleagues use mouse models deficient in the histone variants macroH2A1 and macroH2A2, and find that macroH2A functions as an epigenetic barrier against induced pluripotency by silencing Utx target genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maherali, N., Sridharan, R., Xie, W., Utikal, J., Eminli, S., Arnold, K., Stadtfeld, M., Yachechko, R., Tchieu, J., Jaenisch, R., et al. (2007) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 · Cited by 1,725
Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming
Singhal, N., Graumann, J., Wu, G., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Han, D. W., Greber, B., Gentile, L., Mann, M., & Schöler, H. R. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.037 · Cited by 378
The histone variant macroH2A is an epigenetic regulator of key developmental genes
Buschbeck, M., Uribesalgo, I., Wibowo, I., Rué, P., Martin, D., Gutierrez, A., Morey, L., Guigó, R., López-Schier, H., & Di Croce, L. (2009) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1665 · Cited by 192
Cited by
Pal, S., & Tyler, J. K. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600584 · Cited by 860
H3K9me3-Dependent Heterochromatin: Barrier to Cell Fate Changes
Becker, J. S., Nicetto, D., & Zaret, K. S. (2016) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.11.001 · Cited by 485
Direct cell reprogramming: approaches, mechanisms and progress
Wang, H., Yang, Y., Liu, J., & Qian, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00335-z · Cited by 444
Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming
Apostolou, E., & Hochedlinger, K. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12749 · Cited by 398
The roles of histone variants in fine-tuning chromatin organization and function
Martire, S., & Banaszynski, L. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0262-8 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaspar-Maia, A., Qadeer, Z. A., Hasson, D., Ratnakumar, K., Adrian Leu, N., Leroy, G., Liu, S., Costanzi, C., Valle-Garcia, D., Schaniel, C., Lemischka, I., Garcia, B., Pehrson, J. R., & Bernstein, E.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-03-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1565-1565
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967835379
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.