Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective CD8+ T-cell immunity to human malaria induced by chimpanzee adenovirus-MVA immunisation

Open access
Ewer, Katie J., O’Hara, Geraldine A., Duncan, Christopher J. A., Collins, Katharine A., Sheehy, Susanne H., Reyes-Sandoval, Arturo, Goodman, Anna L., Edwards, Nick J., Elias, Sean C., Halstead, Fenella D., Longley, Rhea J., Rowland, Rosalind, Poulton, Ian D., Draper, Simon J., Blagborough, Andrew M., Berrie, Eleanor, Moyle, Sarah, Williams, Nicola, Siani, Loredana, Folgori, Antonella, Colloca, Stefano, Sinden, Robert E., Lawrie, Alison M., Cortese, Riccardo, Gilbert, Sarah C., Nicosia, Alfredo, Hill, Adrian V. S.·2013·Nature Communications

Abstract

Induction of antigen-specific CD8 + T cells offers the prospect of immunization against many infectious diseases, but no subunit vaccine has induced CD8 + T cells that correlate with efficacy in humans. Here we demonstrate that a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector followed by a modified vaccinia virus Ankara booster induces exceptionally high frequency T-cell responses (median >2400 SFC/10 6 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) to the liver-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria antigen ME-TRAP. It induces sterile protective efficacy against heterologous strain sporozoites in three vaccinees (3/14, 21%), and delays time to patency through substantial reduction of liver-stage parasite burden in five more (5/14, 36%), P =0.008 compared with controls. The frequency of monofunctional interferon-γ-producing CD8 + T cells, but not antibodies, correlates with sterile protection and delay in time to patency ( P corrected =0.005). Vaccine-induced CD8 + T cells provide protection against human malaria, suggesting that a major limitation of previous vaccination approaches has been the insufficient magnitude of induced T cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms3836

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Ewer, K. J., O’Hara, G. A., Duncan, C. J. A., Collins, K. A., Sheehy, S. H., Reyes-Sandoval, A., Goodman, A. L., Edwards, N. J., Elias, S. C., Halstead, F. D., Longley, R. J., Rowland, R., Poulton, I. D., Draper, S. J., Blagborough, A. M., Berrie, E., Moyle, S., Williams, N., Siani, L., Folgori, A., Colloca, S., Sinden, R. E., Lawrie, A. M., Cortese, R., Gilbert, S. C., Nicosia, A., & Hill, A. V. S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2013-11-28
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2836-2836
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063937996
Cited by
286
References
4
FWCI
35.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.