The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A synthetic sex ratio distortion system for the control of the human malaria mosquito
Open accessAbstract
It has been theorized that inducing extreme reproductive sex ratios could be a method to suppress or eliminate pest populations. Limited knowledge about the genetic makeup and mode of action of naturally occurring sex distorters and the prevalence of co-evolving suppressors has hampered their use for control. Here we generate a synthetic sex distortion system by exploiting the specificity of the homing endonuclease I-PpoI, which is able to selectively cleave ribosomal gene sequences of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae that are located exclusively on the mosquito’s X chromosome. We combine structure-based protein engineering and molecular genetics to restrict the activity of the potentially toxic endonuclease to spermatogenesis. Shredding of the paternal X chromosome prevents it from being transmitted to the next generation, resulting in fully fertile mosquito strains that produce >95% male offspring. We demonstrate that distorter male mosquitoes can efficiently suppress caged wild-type mosquito populations, providing the foundation for a new class of genetic vector control strategies. Extreme reproductive sex ratios could result in the suppression or elimination of pest populations. Here, the authors design a synthetic sex distortion system in Anopheles gambiaethat gives rise to fertile mosquito strains that produce over 95% male offsprings and could therefore be used to suppress mosquito populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TALENs: A widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing
Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3486 · Cited by 1,650 · cited 1×
“Other rDNA sequences or alternative X-specific sequence repeats could also be targeted; e.g. by recently described programmable DNA endonucleases 13,14 .”
Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology
Mali, P., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2649 · Cited by 1,197
Cited by
A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention
Achee, N. L., Gould, F., Perkins, T. A., Reiner, R. C., Morrison, A. C., Ritchie, S. A., Gubler, D. J., Teyssou, R., & Scott, T. W. (2015) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655 · Cited by 458
Biological Control of Mosquito Vectors: Past, Present, and Future
Benelli, G., Jeffries, C., & Walker, T. (2016) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects7040052 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Galizi, R., Doyle, L. A., Menichelli, M., Bernardini, F., Deredec, A., Burt, A., Stoddard, B. L., Windbichler, N., & Crisanti, A.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-06-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3977-3977
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122404497
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.