Cited by 138Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis

Femtosecond X-ray-induced explosion of C60 at extreme intensity

Open access
Murphy, B. F., Osipov, T., Jurek, Z., Fang, L., Son, S.-K., Mucke, M., Eland, J.H.D., Zhaunerchyk, V. +19 more·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Understanding molecular femtosecond dynamics under intense X-ray exposure is critical to progress in biomolecular imaging and matter under extreme conditions. Imaging viruses and proteins at an atomic spatial scale and on the time scale of atomic motion requires rigorous, quantitative understanding of dynamical effects of intense X-ray exposure. Here we present an experimental and theoretical study of C60 molecules interacting with intense X-ray pulses from a free-electron laser, revealing the influence of processes not previously reported. Our work illustrates the successful use of classical mechanics to describe all moving particles in C60, an approach that scales well to larger systems, for example, biomolecules. Comparisons of the model with experimental data on C60 ion fragmentation show excellent agreement under a variety of laser conditions. The results indicate that this modelling is applicable for X-ray interactions with any extended system, even at higher X-ray dose rates expected with future light sources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms5281

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An experimentally tested approach to addressing these challenges is the model implemented in XMDYN [112,113].

    “An experimentally tested approach to addressing these challenges is the model implemented in XMDYN [112,113].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, B. F., Osipov, T., Jurek, Z., Fang, L., Son, S.-K., Mucke, M., Eland, J. H. D., Zhaunerchyk, V., Feifel, R., Avaldi, L., Bolognesi, P., Bostedt, C., Bozek, J. D., Grilj, J., Guehr, M., Frasinski, L. J., Glownia, J., Ha, D. T., Hoffmann, K., Kukk, E., McFarland, B. K., Miron, C., Sistrunk, E., Squibb, R. J., Ueda, K., Santra, R., & Berrah, N.
Affiliations
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Institute of Inorganic Methodologies and Plasmas (IT)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Synchrotron SOLEIL (FR)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Berrah, N.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-06-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
4281-4281
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987296779
Cited by
138
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 6
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0292ER14299, FG02-92ER14299, DE‐FG02‐)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging
  • Office of Science
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I032517/1, EP/C530772/2, EP/I032517)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-FG02)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
C60, molecular fragmentation, free-electron laser, femtosecond X-ray pulses, classical molecular dynamics, quantum-classical hybrid models, biomolecular imaging, X-ray dose rate, extreme conditions
MeSH terms
Explosions, Lasers, X-Rays, Fullerenes, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review