Cited by 20Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

Atomistic three-dimensional coherent x-ray imaging of nonbiological systems

Ho, Phay J., Knight, Chris, Tegze, Miklos, Faigel, Gyula, Bostedt, C., Young, L.·2016·Physical Review A

Abstract

We computationally study the resolution limits for three-dimensional coherent x-ray diffractive imaging of heavy, nonbiological systems using Ar clusters as a prototype. We treat electronic and nuclear dynamics on an equal footing and remove the frozen-lattice approximation often used in electronic damage studies. We explore the achievable resolution as a function of pulse parameters (fluence level, pulse duration, and photon energy) and particle size. The contribution of combined lattice and electron dynamics is not negligible even for 2 fs pulses, and the Compton scattering is less deleterious than in biological systems for atomic-scale imaging. Although free-electron scattering represents a significant background, we find that recovery of the original structure is in principle possible with 3 \AA{} resolution for particles of 11 nm diameter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.94.063823

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Massively parallel computing models can now describe the complete x-ray induced process from ionization to inner-vacancy decays to elastic and inelastic scattering, and give guidance on optimized imaging parameters.

    “Massively parallel computing models can now describe the complete x-ray induced process from ionization to inner-vacancy decays, to elastic and inelastic scattering processes, and give guidance on optimized imaging parameters [98].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [98]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [83]J. Als-Nielsen and D. McMorrow, Elements of Modern Xray Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2011), pp. 113-146.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, P. J., Knight, C., Tegze, M., Faigel, G., Bostedt, C., & Young, L.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics (HU)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Ho, Phay J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2016-12-12
Volume
94
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W2562223509
Cited by
20
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alapprogramok (K115504)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Keywords
coherent X-ray diffraction imaging, 3D imaging, resolution limit, argon clusters, electron dynamics, lattice dynamics, Compton scattering, free electron scattering, ultrafast X-ray pulses, pulse parameters, atomic resolution imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review