Cited by 59Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The statistical geometry of transcriptome divergence in cell-type evolution and cancer

Open access
Liang, Cong, the FANTOM Consortium, Forrest, Alistair R.R., Wagner, Günter P.·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

In evolution, body plan complexity increases due to an increase in the number of individualized cell types. Yet, there is very little understanding of the mechanisms that produce this form of organismal complexity. One model for the origin of novel cell types is the sister cell-type model. According to this model, each cell type arises together with a sister cell type through specialization from an ancestral cell type. A key prediction of the sister cell-type model is that gene expression profiles of cell types exhibit tree structure. Here we present a statistical model for detecting tree structure in transcriptomic data and apply it to transcriptomes from ENCODE and FANTOM5. We show that transcriptomes of normal cells harbour substantial amounts of hierarchical structure. In contrast, cancer cell lines have less tree structure, suggesting that the emergence of cancer cells follows different principles from that of evolutionary cell-type origination. Body plan complexity is associated with the number of different cell types, yet the processes that create this diversity are unclear. Here the authors use transcriptomics to test the hypothesis that unlike cancer cells, novel normal cell types arise through sub-specialization of an ancestral cell type.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms7066

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, C., the FANTOM Consortium, Forrest, A. R. R., & Wagner, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Günter P.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-01-14
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
6066-6066
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103682580
Cited by
59
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation (54860)
  • Yale University
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25330333)
  • RIKEN
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
transcriptome divergence, cell type evolution, cancer cell lines, ENCODE, FANTOM5
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Humans, Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review