The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional nickel–iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale industrial application of electrolytic splitting of water has called for the development of oxygen evolution electrodes that are inexpensive, robust and can deliver large current density (>500 mA cm−2) at low applied potentials. Here we show that an efficient oxygen electrode can be developed by electrodepositing amorphous mesoporous nickel–iron composite nanosheets directly onto macroporous nickel foam substrates. The as-prepared oxygen electrode exhibits high catalytic activity towards water oxidation in alkaline solutions, which only requires an overpotential of 200 mV to initiate the reaction, and is capable of delivering current densities of 500 and 1,000 mA cm−2 at overpotentials of 240 and 270 mV, respectively. The electrode also shows prolonged stability against bulk water electrolysis at large current. Collectively, the as-prepared three-dimensional structured electrode is the most efficient oxygen evolution electrode in alkaline electrolytes reported to the best of our knowledge, and can potentially be applied for industrial scale water electrolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
Chang, Y., Lin, C., Chen, T., Hsu, C., Lee, Y., Zhang, W., Wei, K., & Li, L. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201202920 · Cited by 744
Graphene Hydrogels Deposited in Nickel Foams for High‐Rate Electrochemical Capacitors
Chen, J., Sheng, K., Luo, P., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201978 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Roger, I., Shipman, M. A., & Symes, M. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-016-0003 · Cited by 3,503
CO 2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface
Dinh, C.-T., Burdyny, T., Kibria, M. G., Seifitokaldani, A., Gabardo, C. M., García de Arquer, F. P., Kiani, A., Edwards, J. P., De Luna, P., Bushuyev, O. S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9100 · Cited by 2,515
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Transition‐Metal (Co, Ni, and Fe)‐Based Electrocatalysts for the Water Oxidation Reaction
Han, L., Dong, S., & Wang, E. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602270 · Cited by 1,769
Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., & Kundu, S. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee03457a · Cited by 1,632
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, X., & Zhao, C.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-03-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6616-6616
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020080291
- Cited by
- 1,995
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 62.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
