Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Farhat, Maha R, Shapiro, B Jesse, Kieser, Karen J, Sultana, Razvan, Jacobson, Karen R, Victor, Thomas C, Warren, Robin M, Streicher, Elizabeth M, Calver, Alistair, Sloutsky, Alex, Kaur, Devinder, Posey, Jamie E, Plikaytis, Bonnie, Oggioni, Marco R, Gardy, Jennifer L, Johnston, James C, Rodrigues, Mabel, Tang, Patrick K C, Kato-Maeda, Midori, Borowsky, Mark L, Muddukrishna, Bhavana, Kreiswirth, Barry N, Kurepina, Natalia, Galagan, James, Gagneux, Sebastien, Birren, Bruce, Rubin, Eric J, Lander, Eric S, Sabeti, Pardis C, Murray, Megan·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

M. tuberculosis is evolving antibiotic resistance, threatening attempts at tuberculosis epidemic control. Mechanisms of resistance, including genetic changes favored by selection in resistant isolates, are incompletely understood. Using 116 newly sequenced and 7 previously sequenced M. tuberculosis whole genomes, we identified genome-wide signatures of positive selection specific to the 47 drug-resistant strains. By searching for convergent evolution--the independent fixation of mutations in the same nucleotide position or gene--we recovered 100% of a set of known resistance markers. We also found evidence of positive selection in an additional 39 genomic regions in resistant isolates. These regions encode components in cell wall biosynthesis, transcriptional regulation and DNA repair pathways. Mutations in these regions could directly confer resistance or compensate for fitness costs associated with resistance. Functional genetic analysis of mutations in one gene, ponA1, demonstrated an in vitro growth advantage in the presence of the drug rifampicin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2747

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Farhat, M. R., Shapiro, B. J., Kieser, K. J., Sultana, R., Jacobson, K. R., Victor, T. C., Warren, R. M., Streicher, E. M., Calver, A., Sloutsky, A., Kaur, D., Posey, J. E., Plikaytis, B., Oggioni, M. R., Gardy, J. L., Johnston, J. C., Rodrigues, M., Tang, P. K. C., Kato-Maeda, M., Borowsky, M. L., Muddukrishna, B., Kreiswirth, B. N., Kurepina, N., Galagan, J., Gagneux, S., Birren, B., Rubin, E. J., Lander, E. S., Sabeti, P. C., & Murray, M.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
1183-1189
ISSN
  • 1061-4036
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2110150994
Cited by
440
References
38
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.2747
The paper
Farhat, M. R., Shapiro, B. J., Kieser, K. J., Sultana, R., Jacobson, K. R., Victor, T. C., Warren, R. M., Streicher, E. M., Calver, A., Sloutsky, A., Kaur, D., Posey, J. E., Plikaytis, B., Oggioni, M. R., Gardy, J. L., Johnston, J. C., Rodrigues, M., Tang, P. K. C., Kato-Maeda, M., . . . Murray, M. (2013). Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2747

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.