Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders

Open access
Taylor, Jenny C, Martin, Hilary C, Lise, Stefano, Broxholme, John, Cazier, Jean-Baptiste, Rimmer, Andy, Kanapin, Alexander, Lunter, Gerton, Fiddy, Simon, Allan, Chris, Aricescu, A Radu, Attar, Moustafa, Babbs, Christian, Becq, Jennifer, Beeson, David, Bento, Celeste, Bignell, Patricia, Blair, Edward, Buckle, Veronica J, Bull, Katherine, Cais, Ondrej, Cario, Holger, Chapel, Helen, Copley, Richard R, Cornall, Richard, Craft, Jude, Dahan, Karin, Davenport, Emma E, Dendrou, Calliope, Devuyst, Olivier, Fenwick, Aimée L, Flint, Jonathan, Fugger, Lars, Gilbert, Rodney D, Goriely, Anne, Green, Angie, Greger, Ingo H, Grocock, Russell, Gruszczyk, Anja V, Hastings, Robert, Hatton, Edouard, Higgs, Doug, Hill, Adrian, Holmes, Chris, Howard, Malcolm, Hughes, Linda, Humburg, Peter, Johnson, David, Karpe, Fredrik, Kingsbury, Zoya, Kini, Usha, Knight, Julian C, Krohn, Jonathan, Lamble, Sarah, Langman, Craig, Lonie, Lorne, Luck, Joshua, McCarthy, Davis, McGowan, Simon J, McMullin, Mary Frances, Miller, Kerry A, Murray, Lisa, Németh, Andrea H, Nesbit, M Andrew, Nutt, David, Ormondroyd, Elizabeth, Oturai, Annette Bang, Pagnamenta, Alistair, Patel, Smita Y, Percy, Melanie, Petousi, Nayia, Piazza, Paolo, Piret, Sian E, Polanco-Echeverry, Guadalupe, Popitsch, Niko, Powrie, Fiona, Pugh, Chris, Quek, Lynn, Robbins, Peter A, Robson, Kathryn, Russo, Alexandra, Sahgal, Natasha, van Schouwenburg, Pauline A, Schuh, Anna, Silverman, Earl, Simmons, Alison, Sørensen, Per Soelberg, Sweeney, Elizabeth, Taylor, John, Thakker, Rajesh V, Tomlinson, Ian, Trebes, Amy, Twigg, Stephen R F, Uhlig, Holm H, Vyas, Paresh, Vyse, Tim, Wall, Steven A, Watkins, Hugh, Whyte, Michael P, Witty, Lorna, Wright, Ben, Yau, Chris, Buck, David, Humphray, Sean, Ratcliffe, Peter J, Bell, John I, Wilkie, Andrew O M, Bentley, David, Donnelly, Peter, McVean, Gilean·2015·Nature Genetics
DOI 10.1038/ng.3304
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To assess factors influencing the success of whole-genome sequencing for mainstream clinical diagnosis, we sequenced 217 individuals from 156 independent cases or families across a broad spectrum of disorders in whom previous screening had identified no pathogenic variants. We quantified the number of candidate variants identified using different strategies for variant calling, filtering, annotation and prioritization. We found that jointly calling variants across samples, filtering against both local and external databases, deploying multiple annotation tools and using familial transmission above biological plausibility contributed to accuracy. Overall, we identified disease-causing variants in 21% of cases, with the proportion increasing to 34% (23/68) for mendelian disorders and 57% (8/14) in family trios. We also discovered 32 potentially clinically actionable variants in 18 genes unrelated to the referral disorder, although only 4 were ultimately considered reportable. Our results demonstrate the value of genome sequencing for routine clinical diagnosis but also highlight many outstanding challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3304

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, J. C., Martin, H. C., Lise, S., Broxholme, J., Cazier, J.-B., Rimmer, A., Kanapin, A., Lunter, G., Fiddy, S., Allan, C., Aricescu, A. R., Attar, M., Babbs, C., Becq, J., Beeson, D., Bento, C., Bignell, P., Blair, E., Buckle, V. J., Bull, K., Cais, O., Cario, H., Chapel, H., Copley, R. R., Cornall, R., Craft, J., Dahan, K., Davenport, E. E., Dendrou, C., Devuyst, O., Fenwick, A. L., Flint, J., Fugger, L., Gilbert, R. D., Goriely, A., Green, A., Greger, I. H., Grocock, R., Gruszczyk, A. V., Hastings, R., Hatton, E., Higgs, D., Hill, A., Holmes, C., Howard, M., Hughes, L., Humburg, P., Johnson, D., Karpe, F., Kingsbury, Z., Kini, U., Knight, J. C., Krohn, J., Lamble, S., Langman, C., Lonie, L., Luck, J., McCarthy, D., McGowan, S. J., McMullin, M. F., Miller, K. A., Murray, L., Németh, A. H., Nesbit, M. A., Nutt, D., Ormondroyd, E., Oturai, A. B., Pagnamenta, A., Patel, S. Y., Percy, M., Petousi, N., Piazza, P., Piret, S. E., Polanco-Echeverry, G., Popitsch, N., Powrie, F., Pugh, C., Quek, L., Robbins, P. A., Robson, K., Russo, A., Sahgal, N., van Schouwenburg, P. A., Schuh, A., Silverman, E., Simmons, A., Sørensen, P. S., Sweeney, E., Taylor, J., Thakker, R. V., Tomlinson, I., Trebes, A., Twigg, S. R. F., Uhlig, H. H., Vyas, P., Vyse, T., Wall, S. A., Watkins, H., Whyte, M. P., Witty, L., Wright, B., Yau, C., Buck, D., Humphray, S., Ratcliffe, P. J., Bell, J. I., Wilkie, A. O. M., Bentley, D., Donnelly, P., & McVean, G.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
717-726
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
DOI
10.1038/ng.3304
OpenAlex
W1764005853
Cited by
376
References
12
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.