Cited by 455Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetics and Physical Performance

Genome-wide association study identifies 112 new loci for body mass index in the Japanese population

Open access
Akiyama, Masato, Okada, Yukinori, Kanai, Masahiro, Takahashi, Atsushi, Momozawa, Yukihide, Ikeda, Masashi, Iwata, Nakao, Ikegawa, Shiro +14 more·2017·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Obesity is a risk factor for a wide variety of health problems. In a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of body mass index (BMI) in Japanese people (n = 173,430), we found 85 loci significantly associated with obesity (P < 5.0 × 10-8), of which 51 were previously unknown. We conducted trans-ancestral meta-analyses by integrating these results with the results from a GWAS of Europeans and identified 61 additional new loci. In total, this study identifies 112 novel loci, doubling the number of previously known BMI-associated loci. By annotating associated variants with cell-type-specific regulatory marks, we found enrichment of variants in CD19+ cells. We also found significant genetic correlations between BMI and lymphocyte count (P = 6.46 × 10-5, r g = 0.18) and between BMI and multiple complex diseases. These findings provide genetic evidence that lymphocytes are relevant to body weight regulation and offer insights into the pathogenesis of obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3951

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even when non-European cohorts are only a fraction the size of the largest European study, they are likely to have disproportionate value for predicting polygenic traits in other individuals of similar ancestry.

    “These studies have shown that even when non-European cohorts are only a fraction the size of the largest European study, they are likely to have disproportionate value for predicting polygenic traits in other individuals of similar ancestry.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Variance explained by variants in the GWAS section (p. 12) reports that variants selected using the Japanese GWAS explained BMI variance in Japanese cohorts better than variants selected using a European GWAS—1.81 times better on average. This supports the value of ancestry-matched data, but the paper tests BMI in Japanese cohorts, not prediction of polygenic traits generally. The passages also do not establish the claimed size comparison with the largest European study. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akiyama, M., Okada, Y., Kanai, M., Takahashi, A., Momozawa, Y., Ikeda, M., Iwata, N., Ikegawa, S., Hirata, M., Matsuda, K., Iwasaki, M., Yamaji, T., Sawada, N., Hachiya, T., Tanno, K., Shimizu, A., Hozawa, A., Minegishi, N., Tsugane, S., Yamamoto, M., Kubo, M., & Kamatani, Y.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (JP)
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
  • Fujita Health University (JP)
  • Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • National Cancer Centre Japan (JP)
  • Iwate Medical University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kamatani, Yoichiro
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2017-09-11
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
1458-1467
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2755116403
Cited by
455
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 2
FWCI
31.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR) (Kyushu University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K09464, 16H02676, 17H03596, 15H05911, 17H01557, 15H05670)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
body mass index, obesity, genetic loci, novel genetic variants, Japanese population, CD19+ B cells, lymphocyte count, genetic correlation, complex diseases, body weight regulation
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Humans, Japan, Obesity, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Lymphocyte Count, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Asian People, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review