Cited by 674Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

A genome-wide association study in Europeans and South Asians identifies five new loci for coronary artery disease

The Coronary Artery Disease (C4D) Genetics Consortium·2011·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified 11 common variants convincingly associated with coronary artery disease (CAD)¹⁻⁷, a modest number considering the apparent heritability of CAD⁸. All of these variants have been discovered in European populations. We report a meta-analysis of four large genome-wide association studies of CAD, with ∼575,000 genotyped SNPs in a discovery dataset comprising 15,420 individuals with CAD (cases) (8,424 Europeans and 6,996 South Asians) and 15,062 controls. There was little evidence for ancestry-specific associations, supporting the use of combined analyses. Replication in an independent sample of 21,408 cases and 19,185 controls identified five loci newly associated with CAD (P < 5 × 10⁻⁸ in the combined discovery and replication analysis): LIPA on 10q23, PDGFD on 11q22, ADAMTS7-MORF4L1 on 15q25, a gene rich locus on 7q22 and KIAA1462 on 10p11. The CAD-associated SNP in the PDGFD locus showed tissue-specific cis expression quantitative trait locus effects. These findings implicate new pathways for CAD susceptibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.782

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomewide association analyses since 2007 have identified more than 50 independent loci associated with coronary artery disease risk.

    “Since 2007, genomewide association analyses have identified more than 50 independent loci associated with the risk of coronary artery disease.7–15”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Coronary Artery Disease (C4D) Genetics Consortium
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2011-03-06
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
339-344
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2095821741
Cited by
674
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 66
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0407-10371)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
coronary artery disease, genetic susceptibility loci, single nucleotide polymorphisms, LIPA, PDGF-D, South Asians, Europeans
MeSH terms
ADAMTS7 Protein, Adult, Aged, Sterol Esterase, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Lymphokines, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Transcription Factors, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, White People, Asian People, ADAM Proteins, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review