Cited by 285Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Transcription-associated mutational asymmetry in mammalian evolution

NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Green, Phil, Ewing, Brent, Miller, Webb, Thomas, Pamela J., Green, Eric D.·2003·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Although mutation is commonly thought of as a random process, evolutionary studies show that different types of nucleotide substitution occur with widely varying rates that presumably reflect biases intrinsic to mutation and repair mechanisms. A strand asymmetry, the occurrence of particular substitution types at higher rates than their complementary types, that is associated with DNA replication has been found in bacteria and mitochondria. A strand asymmetry that is associated with transcription and attributable to higher rates of cytosine deamination on the coding strand has been observed in enterobacteria. Here, we describe a qualitatively different transcription-associated strand asymmetry in mammals, which may be a byproduct of transcription-coupled repair in germline cells. This mutational asymmetry has acted over long periods of time to produce a compositional asymmetry, an excess of G+T over A+C on the coding strand, in most genes. The mutational and compositional asymmetries can be used to detect the orientations and approximate extents of transcribed regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng1103

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Private Asian and African TCC to T SNPs exhibit the strand bias typical of A/C to G/T mutations, with the C to T change usually affecting the antisense strand and the G to A change usually affecting the sense strand.

    “Private Asian and African TCC → T SNPs were found to exhibit the strand bias that is typical of A/C → G/T mutations (28), with the C → T change usually affecting the antisense strand and the G → A change usually affecting the sense strand.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Program, N. C. S., Green, P., Ewing, B., Miller, W., Thomas, P. J., & Green, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Phil
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2003-03-03
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
514-517
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2087627409
Cited by
285
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
strand asymmetry, cytosine deamination, transcription-coupled repair, germ cells, compositional asymmetry, GC content, DNA replication, mammalian evolution, nucleotide substitution rates
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, DNA Mutational Analysis, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Genetic, Papio, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, DNA, CpG Islands, Cell Lineage, Databases as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review