The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes
Open accessAbstract
Rechargeable lithium, sodium and aluminium metal-based batteries are among the most versatile platforms for high-energy, cost-effective electrochemical energy storage. Non-uniform metal deposition and dendrite formation on the negative electrode during repeated cycles of charge and discharge are major hurdles to commercialization of energy-storage devices based on each of these chemistries. A long-held view is that unstable electrodeposition is a consequence of inherent characteristics of these metals and their inability to form uniform electrodeposits on surfaces with inevitable defects. We report on electrodeposition of lithium in simple liquid electrolytes and in nanoporous solids infused with liquid electrolytes. We find that simple liquid electrolytes reinforced with halogenated salt blends exhibit stable long-term cycling at room temperature, often with no signs of deposition instabilities over hundreds of cycles of charge and discharge and thousands of operating hours. We rationalize these observations with the help of surface energy data for the electrolyte/lithium interface and impedance analysis of the interface during different stages of cell operation. Our findings provide support for an important recent theoretical prediction that the surface mobility of lithium is significantly enhanced in the presence of lithium halide salts. Our results also show that a high electrolyte modulus is unnecessary for stable electrodeposition of lithium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additives to Render Uniform Li Deposits in Lithium Metal Batteries
Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201605989 · Cited by 1,699
Advancing Lithium Metal Batteries
Liu, B., Zhang, J.-G., & Xu, W. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.008 · Cited by 1,647
The synergetic effect of lithium polysulfide and lithium nitrate to prevent lithium dendrite growth
Li, W., Yao, H., Yan, K., Zheng, G., Liang, Z., Chiang, Y.-M., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8436 · Cited by 1,540
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Tu, Z., & Archer, L. A.
- Venue
- Nature Materials
- Published
- 2014-08-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 961-969
- ISSN
- 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2070416274
- Cited by
- 1,592
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmat4041
- The paper
- Lu, Y., Tu, Z., & Archer, L. A. (2014). Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.