The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of (G+C)-biased genomes
Open accessAbstract
Amplification artifacts introduced during library preparation for the Illumina Genome Analyzer increase the likelihood that an appreciable proportion of these sequences will be duplicates and cause an uneven distribution of read coverage across the targeted sequencing regions. As a consequence, these unfavorable features result in difficulties in genome assembly and variation analysis from the short reads, particularly when the sequences are from genomes with base compositions at the extremes of high or low G+C content. Here we present an amplification-free method of library preparation, in which the cluster amplification step, rather than the PCR, enriches for fully ligated template strands, reducing the incidence of duplicate sequences, improving read mapping and single nucleotide polymorphism calling and aiding de novo assembly. We illustrate this by generating and analyzing DNA sequences from extremely (G+C)-poor (Plasmodium falciparum), (G+C)-neutral (Escherichia coli) and (G+C)-rich (Bordetella pertussis) genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
Self-citation
Cited by
Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies
Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S., & Phillippy, A. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 · Cited by 3,643
Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Nik-Zainal, S., Davies, H., Staaf, J., Ramakrishna, M., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Martincorena, I., Alexandrov, L. B., Martin, S., Wedge, D. C., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17676 · Cited by 2,218
RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities
Ozsolak, F., & Milos, P. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2934 · Cited by 2,135
“Third, the in-solution or on-surface amplification step included in some of these approaches may introduce additional artefacts — for example, in the form of GC biases and duplicate read”
BackgroundQuail, M., Smith, M. E., Coupland, P., Otto, T. D., Harris, S. R., Connor, T. R., Bertoni, A., Swerdlow, H. P., & Gu, Y. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-341 · Cited by 2,031
Self-citationMutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers
Nik-Zainal, S., Alexandrov, L. B., Wedge, D. C., Van Loo, P., Greenman, C. D., Raine, K., Jones, D., Hinton, J., Marshall, J., Stebbings, L. A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024 · Cited by 1,909
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozarewa, I., Ning, Z., Quail, M. A., Sanders, M. J., Berriman, M., & Turner, D. J.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2009-03-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-295
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2158297569
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
