The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scanless two-photon excitation of channelrhodopsin-2
Open accessAbstract
Light-gated ion channels and pumps have made it possible to probe intact neural circuits by manipulating the activity of groups of genetically similar neurons. What is needed now is a method for precisely aiming the stimulating light at single neuronal processes, neurons or groups of neurons. We developed a method that combines generalized phase contrast with temporal focusing (TF-GPC) to shape two-photon excitation for this purpose. The illumination patterns are generated automatically from fluorescence images of neurons and shaped to cover the cell body or dendrites, or distributed groups of cells. The TF-GPC two-photon excitation patterns generated large photocurrents in Channelrhodopsin-2–expressing cultured cells and neurons and in mouse acute cortical slices. The amplitudes of the photocurrents can be precisely modulated by controlling the size and shape of the excitation volume and, thereby, be used to trigger single action potentials or trains of action potentials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice
Huber, D., Petreanu, L., Ghitani, N., Ranade, S., Hromádka, T., Mainen, Z., & Svoboda, K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06445 · Cited by 539
Highly Nonlinear Photodamage in Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy
Hopt, A., & Neher, E. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76173-5 · Cited by 442
Cited by
Optogenetics in neural systems
Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Davidson, T. J., Mogri, M., & Deisseroth, K. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004 · Cited by 1,881
The development and application of optogenetics
Fenno, L., Yizhar, O., & Deisseroth, K. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113817 · Cited by 1,822
Two-photon optogenetic toolbox for fast inhibition, excitation and bistable modulation
Prakash, R., Yizhar, O., Grewe, B., Ramakrishnan, C., Wang, N., Goshen, I., Packer, A. M., Peterka, D. S., Yuste, R., Schnitzer, M. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2215 · Cited by 334
Genetic Approaches to Neural Circuits in the Mouse
Josh Huang, Z., & Zeng, H. (2013) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170307 · Cited by 200
dal Maschio, M., Donovan, J. C., Helmbrecht, T. O., & Baier, H. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.034 · Cited by 169
Neuronal circuits in barrel cortex for whisker sensory perception
Staiger, J. F., & Petersen, C. C. H. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2019 · Cited by 165
Neuronal gain modulability is determined by dendritic morphology: A computational optogenetic study
Jarvis, S., Nikolic, K., & Schultz, S. R. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006027 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Papagiakoumou, E., Anselmi, F., Bègue, A., de Sars, V., Glückstad, J., Isacoff, E. Y., & Emiliani, V.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2010-09-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 848-854
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2156814492
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.