Cited by 539Photoreceptor and optogenetics researchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice

Open access
Huber, Daniel, Petreanu, Leopoldo, Ghitani, Nima, Ranade, Sachin, Hromádka, Tomáš, Mainen, Zach, Svoboda, Karel·2008·Nature

Abstract

Electrical microstimulation can establish causal links between the activity of groups of neurons and perceptual and cognitive functions. However, the number and identities of neurons microstimulated, as well as the number of action potentials evoked, are difficult to ascertain. To address these issues we introduced the light-gated algal channel channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) specifically into a small fraction of layer 2/3 neurons of the mouse primary somatosensory cortex. ChR2 photostimulation in vivo reliably generated stimulus-locked action potentials at frequencies up to 50 Hz. Here we show that naive mice readily learned to detect brief trains of action potentials (five light pulses, 1 ms, 20 Hz). After training, mice could detect a photostimulus firing a single action potential in approximately 300 neurons. Even fewer neurons (approximately 60) were required for longer stimuli (five action potentials, 250 ms). Our results show that perceptual decisions and learning can be driven by extremely brief epochs of cortical activity in a sparse subset of supragranular cortical pyramidal neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06445

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, D., Petreanu, L., Ghitani, N., Ranade, S., Hromádka, T., Mainen, Z., & Svoboda, K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Svoboda, Karel
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-01
Volume
451
Issue
7174
Pages
61-64
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1963937305
Cited by
539
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 32
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
channelrhodopsin-2, barrel cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, layer 2/3 neurons, action potential detection, perceptual learning, perceptual decision making, freely moving mice
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Learning, Movement, Photic Stimulation, Pyramidal Cells, Algal Proteins, Rhodopsins, Microbial, Mice, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review