The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Objective comparison of particle tracking methods
Open accessAbstract
The first community competition designed to objectively compare the performance of particle tracking algorithms provides valuable practical information for both users and developers. Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Piepel, G. F. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488524 · Cited by 6,144
Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems
Munkres, J. (1957) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0105003 · Cited by 3,986
Evidence for the Formation of Symmetric and Asymmetric DLPC-DAPC Lipid Bilayer Domains
Ritter, M., Schmidt, S., Jakab, M., Paulmichl, M., & Henderson, R. (2013) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000350122 · Cited by 3,923
Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies
Crocker, J. C., & Grier, D. G. (1996) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 · Cited by 3,765
Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision
Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., & Boyle, R. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3216-7 · Cited by 3,717
Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems
Blackman, S. S., & Populi, R. (1999) · Cited by 3,509
A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins
Shaner, N. C., Steinbach, P. A., & Tsien, R. Y. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth819 · Cited by 2,840
The Fluorescent Toolbox for Assessing Protein Location and Function
Giepmans, B. N. G., Adams, S. R., Ellisman, M. H., & Tsien, R. Y. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124618 · Cited by 2,770
Cited by
TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking
Tinevez, J.-Y., Perry, N., Schindelin, J., Hoopes, G. M., Reynolds, G. D., Laplantine, E., Bednarek, S. Y., Shorte, S. L., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 · Cited by 3,380
Self-citationA bird's-eye view of deep learning in bioimage analysis
Meijering, E. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.003 · Cited by 126
Self-citationTracking and interpreting long-range chromatin interactions with super-resolution live-cell imaging
Brandão, H. B., Gabriele, M., & Hansen, A. S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.11.002 · Cited by 77
Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation
Maier-Hein, L., Reinke, A., Godau, P., Tizabi, M. D., Buettner, F., Christodoulou, E., Glocker, B., Isensee, F., Kleesiek, J., Kozubek, M., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.01653 · Cited by 59
Self-citationKæstel-Hansen, J., de Sautu, M., Saminathan, A., Scanavachi, G., Bango Da Cunha Correia, R. F., Juma Nielsen, A., Bleshøy, S. V., Tsolakidis, K., Boomsma, W., Kirchhausen, T., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02665-8 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenouard, N., Smal, I., de Chaumont, F., Maška, M., Sbalzarini, I. F., Gong, Y., Cardinale, J., Carthel, C., Coraluppi, S., Winter, M., Cohen, A. R., Godinez, W. J., Rohr, K., Kalaidzidis, Y., Liang, L., Duncan, J., Shen, H., Xu, Y., Magnusson, K. E. G., Jaldén, J., Blau, H. M., Paul-Gilloteaux, P., Roudot, P., Kervrann, C., Waharte, F., Tinevez, J.-Y., Shorte, S. L., Willemse, J., Celler, K., van Wezel, G. P., Dan, H.-W., Tsai, Y.-S., de Solórzano, C. O., Olivo-Marin, J.-C., & Meijering, E.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2014-01-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-289
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2103706175
- Cited by
- 894
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 49.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmeth.2808
- The paper
- Chenouard, N., Smal, I., de Chaumont, F., Maška, M., Sbalzarini, I. F., Gong, Y., Cardinale, J., Carthel, C., Coraluppi, S., Winter, M., Cohen, A. R., Godinez, W. J., Rohr, K., Kalaidzidis, Y., Liang, L., Duncan, J., Shen, H., Xu, Y., Magnusson, K. E. G., . . . Meijering, E. (2014). Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
