Cited by 144Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Materials Characterization TechniquesCell Image Analysis Techniques

Ultrastructurally smooth thick partitioning and volume stitching for large-scale connectomics

Open access
Hayworth, Kenneth J, Xu, C Shan, Lu, Zhiyuan, Knott, Graham W, Fetter, Richard D, Tapia, Juan Carlos, Lichtman, Jeff W, Hess, Harald F·2015·Nature Methods

Abstract

Focused-ion-beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) has become an essential tool for studying neural tissue at resolutions below 10 nm × 10 nm × 10 nm, producing data sets optimized for automatic connectome tracing. We present a technical advance, ultrathick sectioning, which reliably subdivides embedded tissue samples into chunks (20 μm thick) optimally sized and mounted for efficient, parallel FIB-SEM imaging. These chunks are imaged separately and then 'volume stitched' back together, producing a final three-dimensional data set suitable for connectome tracing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3292

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We used improved hot-knife sectioning to section the brain into 37 sagittal slabs of 20 μm thickness with estimated material loss between consecutive slabs of only ∼30 nm - sufficiently small to allow tracing of long-distance neurites.

    “We used an improved version of our previously published ‘hot-knife’ ultrathick sectioning procedure (Hayworth et al., 2015) which uses a heated, oil-lubricated diamond knife, to section the Drosophila brain into 37 sagittal slabs of 20 μm thickness with an estimated material loss between consecutive slabs of only ∼30 nm – sufficiently small to allow tracing of long-distance neurites.”

    From A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain (2020) · cites this paper as Hayworth et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Sommer C Strähle C Köthe U Hamprecht FA Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) Proceedings 2011 230 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayworth, K. J., Xu, C. S., Lu, Z., Knott, G. W., Fetter, R. D., Tapia, J. C., Lichtman, J. W., & Hess, H. F.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hayworth, Kenneth J
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2015-02-16
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
319-322
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2083707522
Cited by
144
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
FIB-SEM, connectomics, parallel imaging, 3D reconstruction
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review