Cited by 502Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data

Levet, Florian, Hosy, Eric, Kechkar, Adel, Butler, Corey, Beghin, Anne, Choquet, Daniel, Sibarita, Jean-Baptiste·2015·Nature Methods

Abstract

Localization-based super-resolution techniques open the door to unprecedented analysis of molecular organization. This task often involves complex image processing adapted to the specific topology and quality of the image to be analyzed. Here we present a segmentation framework based on Voronoï tessellation constructed from the coordinates of localized molecules, implemented in freely available and open-source SR-Tesseler software. This method allows precise, robust and automatic quantification of protein organization at different scales, from the cellular level down to clusters of a few fluorescent markers. We validated our method on simulated data and on various biological experimental data of proteins labeled with genetically encoded fluorescent proteins or organic fluorophores. In addition to providing insight into complex protein organization, this polygon-based method should serve as a reference for the development of new types of quantifications, as well as for the optimization of existing ones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3579

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RIM1-mEos3 distribution was nonuniform and contained nanoclusters with an average diameter of 80.95 ± 5.34 nm using adapted SR-Tesseler analysis and 78.93 ± 5.85 nm using nearest neighbor distance analysis.

    “The distribution of RIM1-mEos3 was nonuniform and contained NCs with an average diameter of 80.95 ± 5.34 nm and 78.93 ± 5.85 nm using either an adapted SR-Tesseler analysis15 or nearest neighbor distance analysis4, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 6f), consistent with our 3D-STORM results (Fig. 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levet, F., Hosy, E., Kechkar, A., Butler, C., Beghin, A., Choquet, D., & Sibarita, J.-B.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Sibarita, Jean-Baptiste
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2015-09-07
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1065-1071
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1833667256
Cited by
502
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 2
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-0004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
Voronoi tessellation, image segmentation, organic fluorophores, molecular organization
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Chlorocebus aethiops, Computer Simulation, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neurons, Oocytes, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Software, Xenopus laevis, Cluster Analysis, Receptors, Glycine, Computational Biology, COS Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review