The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative mapping and minimization of super-resolution optical imaging artifacts
Open accessAbstract
Most super-resolution microscopy methods depend on steps that contribute to the formation of image artefacts. Here we present NanoJ-SQUIRREL, an ImageJ-based analytical approach providing a quantitative assessment of super-resolution image quality. By comparing diffraction-limited images and super-resolution equivalents of the same focal volume, this approach generates a quantitative map of super-resolution defects, as well as methods for their correction. To illustrate its broad applicability to super-resolution approaches we apply our method to Localization Microscopy, STED and SIM images of a variety of in-cell structures including microtubules, poxviruses, neuronal actin rings and clathrin coated pits. We particularly focus on single-molecule localisation microscopy, where super-resolution reconstructions often feature imperfections not present in the original data. By showing the quantitative evolution of data quality over these varied sample preparation, acquisition and super-resolution methods we display the potential of NanoJ-SQUIRREL to guide optimization of superresolution imaging parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Cited by
Switchable Fluorophores for Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy
Li, H., & Vaughan, J. C. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00767 · Cited by 319
Seeing beyond the limit: A guide to choosing the right super-resolution microscopy technique
Valli, J., Garcia-Burgos, A., Rooney, L. M., Vale de Melo e Oliveira, B., Duncan, R. R., & Rickman, C. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100791 · Cited by 159
One-step nanoscale expansion microscopy reveals individual protein shapes
Shaib, A. H., Chouaib, A. A., Chowdhury, R., Altendorf, J., Mihaylov, D., Zhang, C., Krah, D., Imani, V., Spencer, R. K. W., Georgiev, S. V., et al. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02431-9 · Cited by 104
Multi-resolution analysis enables fidelity-ensured deconvolution for fluorescence microscopy
Hou, Y., Wang, W., Fu, Y., Ge, X., Li, M., & Xi, P. (2024) · eLight · doi:10.1186/s43593-024-00073-7 · Cited by 42
Rab10 regulates the sorting of internalised TrkB for retrograde axonal transport
Lazo, O. M., & Schiavo, G. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81532 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Culley, S., Albrecht, D., Jacobs, C., Pereira, P. M., Leterrier, C., Mercer, J., & Henriques, R.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2018-02-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 263-266
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2788997417
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.