Cited by 301Nerve injury and regenerationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

A dual leucine kinase–dependent axon self-destruction program promotes Wallerian degeneration

Open access
Miller, Bradley R, Press, Craig, Daniels, Richard W, Sasaki, Yo, Milbrandt, Jeffrey, DiAntonio, Aaron·2009·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Axon degeneration underlies many common neurological disorders, but the signaling pathways that orchestrate axon degeneration are unknown. We found that dual leucine kinase (DLK) [corrected to add (DLK) abbreviation] promoted degeneration of severed axons in Drosophila and mice, and that its target, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, promoted degeneration locally in axons as they committed to degenerate. This pathway also promoted degeneration after chemotherapy exposure and may be a component of a general axon self-destruction program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2290

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At baseline, NLK is highly expressed in the CNS, and its expression is unregulated by oxidative and osmotic stress.

    “At baseline, NLK is highly expressed in the CNS, and its expression is unregulated by oxidative and osmotic stress (52, 53), conditions associated with the cytosolic accumulation of TDP43 and other, predominantly nuclear, RNA binding proteins.”

    From Nemo-like kinase disrupts nuclear import and drives TDP43 mislocalization in ALS (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The passages on axon degeneration discuss DLK and JNK, not NLK. Searches for NLK, Nemo-like kinase, CNS expression, and oxidative or osmotic stress found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]Saxena S Caroni P Prog Neurobiol 83 174 91 2007 17822833
  2. [2]Coleman M Nat Rev Neurosci 6 889 98 2005 16224497
  3. [3]Mack TG Nat Neurosci 4 1199 206 2001 11770485
  4. [4]Araki T Sasaki Y Milbrandt J Science 305 1010 3 2004 15310905
  5. [5]Wang J J Cell Biol 170 349 55 2005 16043516 PMC2171458
  6. [6]George EB Glass JD Griffin JW J Neurosci 15 6445 52 1995 7472407 PMC6577979
  7. [7]Zhai Q Neuron 39 217 25 2003 12873380
  8. [8]MacDonald JM Neuron 50 869 81 2006 16772169
  9. [9]Luo L O’Leary DD Annu Rev Neurosci 28 127 56 2005 16022592
  10. [10]Gallo KA Johnson GL Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3 663 72 2002 12209126
  11. [11]Cavalli V Kujala P Klumperman J Goldstein LS J Cell Biol 168 775 87 2005 15738268 PMC2171809
  12. [12]Hoopfer ED Neuron 50 883 95 2006 16772170
  13. [13]Collins CA Wairkar YP Johnson SL DiAntonio A Neuron 51 57 69 2006 16815332
  14. [14]Bloom AJ Miller BR Sanes JR DiAntonio A Genes Dev 21 2593 606 2007 17901218 PMC2000324
  15. [15]Wang MS Wu Y Culver DG Glass JD J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59 599 606 2000 10901231

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, B. R., Press, C., Daniels, R. W., Sasaki, Y., Milbrandt, J., & DiAntonio, A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
DiAntonio, Aaron
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2009-03-15
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
387-389
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2029630756
Cited by
301
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 13730, P 50 AG05681, P50AG005681, R01AG013730)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA020812, R01DA020812)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS040745, P30NS057105, NS040745)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
axonal degeneration, Wallerian degeneration, DLK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, JNK signaling, Drosophila, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthracenes, Axons, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila, Embryo, Mammalian, Enzyme Inhibitors, Ganglia, Spinal, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Sciatic Nerve, Wallerian Degeneration, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Axotomy, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases, Animals, Genetically Modified, JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review