Cited by 619Nerve injury and regenerationCell death mechanisms and regulationCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

The SARM1 toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain possesses intrinsic NAD(+) cleavage activity that promotes pathological axonal degeneration

Open access
Essuman, Kow, Summers, Daniel W., Sasaki, Yo, Mao, Xianrong, DiAntonio, Aaron, Milbrandt, Jeffrey·2017·Neuron

Abstract

Axonal degeneration is an early and prominent feature of many neurological disorders. SARM1 is the central executioner of the axonal degeneration pathway that culminates in depletion of axonal NAD+, yet the identity of the underlying NAD+-depleting enzyme(s) is unknown. Here, in a series of experiments using purified proteins from mammalian cells, bacteria, and a cell-free protein translation system, we show that the SARM1-TIR domain itself has intrinsic NADase activity-cleaving NAD+ into ADP-ribose (ADPR), cyclic ADPR, and nicotinamide, with nicotinamide serving as a feedback inhibitor of the enzyme. Using traumatic and vincristine-induced injury models in neurons, we demonstrate that the NADase activity of full-length SARM1 is required in axons to promote axonal NAD+ depletion and axonal degeneration after injury. Hence, the SARM1 enzyme represents a novel therapeutic target for axonopathies. Moreover, the widely utilized TIR domain is a protein motif that can possess enzymatic activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.022

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sarm1 TIR domain cleaves NAD+ into cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) as a new class of NAD+ hydrolases.

    “Subsequent work showed that Sarm1 TIR domain cleaves NAD + into cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) as a new class of NAD + hydrolases 10,44”
  • SARM1 NADase activity may contribute to axonal degeneration and is a potential target for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative diseases.

    “The NADase activity of SARM1 may contribute to its role in axonal degeneration (Essuman et al., 2017) and is therefore a potential target for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative diseases.”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Essuman et al., 2017

  • SARM1 cleaves NAD+ into NAM, ADPR, and cADPR via its TIR domain and is expressed in brain and non-brain tissues including liver.

    “SARM1 is a newly recognized class of NADase that cleaves NAD+ into NAM, ADPR, and cADPR via its TIR domain. It is expressed in both brain and non-brain tissues, including the liver (Essuman et al., 2017; Pan and An, 2018).”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Essuman et al., 2017

  • The enzymatic activity of SARM1 relies on the Toll/interleukin receptor (TIR) domain, which was previously not known to possess catalytic activity.

    “The enzymatic activity of SARM1 (FIG. 2c) relies on the Toll/interleukin receptor (TIR) domain that was previously not known to possess catalytic activity and generally to be involved in protein–protein interaction59.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Essuman, K., Summers, D. W., Sasaki, Y., Mao, X., DiAntonio, A., & Milbrandt, J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • DiAntonio, Aaron
  • Milbrandt, Jeffrey
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
1334-1343.e5
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2602599682
Cited by
619
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 8
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41 GM103422)
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA344513, MDA349925)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000448)
  • Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences
  • Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA091842)
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1AG013730, RO1NS065053, RO1NS087632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
SARM1, Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain, NADase activity, axonal degeneration, NAD+ depletion, ADP-ribose, axonal injury, traumatic axonal injury, axonopathy, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Cells, Cultured, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Humans, NAD, NAD+ Nucleosidase, Nerve Degeneration, Mice, Knockout, Catalytic Domain, Armadillo Domain Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review