Cited by 140Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity drives motor learning

Open access
Nguyen-Vu, T D Barbara, Kimpo, Rhea R, Rinaldi, Jacob M, Kohli, Arunima, Zeng, Hongkui, Deisseroth, Karl, Raymond, Jennifer L·2013·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The climbing fiber input to the cerebellar cortex is thought to provide instructive signals that drive the induction of motor skill learning. We found that optogenetic activation of Purkinje cells, the sole output neurons of the cerebellar cortex, can also drive motor learning in mice. This dual control over the induction of learning by climbing fibers and Purkinje cells can expand the learning capacity of motor circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3576

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are multiple demonstrations of cerebellar learning that is independent of climbing fiber input.

    “In addition there are multiple demonstrations of cerebellar learning that is independent of climbing fiber input (Boyden et al., 2004; Ke et al., 2009; Nguyen-Vu et al., 2013; Shin et al., 2014; Hewitt et al., 2015).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Nguyen-Vu et al., 2013

    The paper reports that optogenetic Purkinje-cell activation induced motor learning in mice and suggests that it acts through a mechanism distinct from climbing-fiber activation (results and discussion, page unavailable). It does not report eliminating climbing-fiber input during that learning, so it does not establish independence from that input. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen-Vu, T. D. B., Kimpo, R. R., Rinaldi, J. M., Kohli, A., Zeng, H., Deisseroth, K., & Raymond, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Raymond, Jennifer L
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2013-10-27
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1734-1736
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2040208273
Cited by
140
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020016)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F31DC010547, P30DC010363, R01 DC04154, P30 DC10363, R01DC004154)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS057488, P30NS069375, K01NS069617, P01NS053862, R01NS072406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Purkinje cells, cerebellum, motor learning, optogenetic stimulation, climbing fibers, cerebellar cortex, motor circuits
MeSH terms
Channelrhodopsins, Acoustic Stimulation, Action Potentials, Dependovirus, Animals, Cerebellum, Gene Expression Regulation, Functional Laterality, Learning, Luminescent Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Mutation, Photic Stimulation, Purkinje Cells, Transduction, Genetic, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Mice, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review