The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine transients are sufficient and necessary for acquisition of model-based associations
Open accessAbstract
Associative learning is driven by prediction errors. Dopamine transients correlate with these errors, which current interpretations limit to endowing cues with a scalar quantity reflecting the value of future rewards. We tested whether dopamine might act more broadly to support learning of an associative model of the environment. Using sensory preconditioning, we show that prediction errors underlying stimulus–stimulus learning can be blocked behaviorally and reinstated by optogenetically activating dopamine neurons. We further show that suppressing the firing of these neurons across the transition prevents normal stimulus–stimulus learning. These results establish that the acquisition of model-based information about transitions between nonrewarding events is also driven by prediction errors and that, contrary to existing canon, dopamine transients are both sufficient and necessary to support this type of learning. Our findings open new possibilities for how these biological signals might support associative learning in the mammalian brain in these and other contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.6.532 · Cited by 3,023
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1560 · Cited by 2,533
Self-citationModel-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors
Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027 · Cited by 1,779
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area
Cohen, J. Y., Haesler, S., Vong, L., Lowell, B. B., & Uchida, N. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10754 · Cited by 1,318
Phasic Firing in Dopaminergic Neurons Is Sufficient for Behavioral Conditioning
Tsai, H.-C., Zhang, F., Adamantidis, A., Stuber, G. D., Bonci, A., de Lecea, L., & Deisseroth, K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168878 · Cited by 1,266
Gläscher, J., Daw, N., Dayan, P., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.016 · Cited by 1,166
Cited by
Reinforcement learning, fast and slow
Botvinick, M., Ritter, S., Wang, J. X., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Blundell, C., & Hassabis, D. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.006 · Cited by 667
Hallucinations and strong priors
Corlett, P. R., Horga, G., Fletcher, P. C., Alderson-Day, B., Schmack, K., & Powers, A. R. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.001 · Cited by 534
Prioritized memory access explains planning and hippocampal replay
Mattar, M. G., & Daw, N. D. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0232-z · Cited by 393
Miller, K. J., Shenhav, A., & Ludvig, E. A. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000120 · Cited by 280
Reinforcement learning in artificial and biological systems
Neftci, E. O., & Averbeck, B. B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0025-4 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharpe, M. J., Chang, C. Y., Liu, M. A., Batchelor, H. M., Mueller, L. E., Jones, J. L., Niv, Y., & Schoenbaum, G.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2017-04-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 735-742
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2604220916
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopamine transients are sufficient and necessary for acquisition of model-based associations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nn.4538
- The paper
- Sharpe, M. J., Chang, C. Y., Liu, M. A., Batchelor, H. M., Mueller, L. E., Jones, J. L., Niv, Y., & Schoenbaum, G. (2017). Dopamine transients are sufficient and necessary for acquisition of model-based associations. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
