Cited by 470Advanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies

Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses

Lee, Joohyung, Kim, Young-Jin, Lee, Keunwoo, Lee, Sanghyun, Kim, Seung-Woo·2010·Nature Photonics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2010.175

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, K., Lee, S., & Kim, S.-W.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Seung-Woo
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2010-08-08
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
716-720
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2059174070
Cited by
470
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Keywords
time-of-flight measurement, femtosecond pulses, optical cross-correlation, Allan deviation, LiDAR, range finding, satellite formation flying, synthetic aperture imaging, tests of general relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review