Cited by 453Advanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Searching for applications with a fine-tooth comb

Newbury, Nathan R.·2011·Nature Photonics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2011.38

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newbury, N. R.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Newbury, Nathan R.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2011-03-31
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
186-188
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2029034297
Cited by
453
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
frequency combs, optical metrology, broadband light source, precision measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review