Cited by 96Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

The Schmidt number as a universal entanglement measure

Open access
Sperling, J, Vogel, W·2011·Physica Scripta

Abstract

The class of local invertible operations is defined and the invariance of entanglement under such operations is established.For the quantification of entanglement, universal entanglement measures are defined, which are invariant under local invertible transformations.They quantify entanglement in a very general sense.It is shown that the Schmidt number is a universal entanglement measure, which is most important for the general amount of entanglement.For special applications, pseudo-measures are defined to quantify the useful entanglement for a certain quantum task.The entanglement quantification is further specified by operational measures, which include the accessible observables by a given experimental setup.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-8949/83/04/045002

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first non-classicality criterion (Bromberg et al.) states that when two incoherent classical beams are coupled to two distinct input waveguides, the resulting intensity correlations always satisfy Γ_ns,ni > (2/3)√(Γ_ns,ns Γ_ni,ni).

    “The first one, established by Bromberg et al. [32, 40], states that when two incoherent classical beams are coupled to two distinct input waveguides, the resulting intensity correlations Γ n s ,n i = | Ψ( n s , n i ) | 2 always satisfy the following”

    From Tailoring quantum walks in integrated photonic lattices (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W.
Affiliations
University of Rostock (DE)
Venue
Physica Scripta
Published
2011-03-08
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
045002
ISSN
  • 0031-8949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1402-4896
OpenAlex
W2094087432
Cited by
96
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physica Scripta (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 652)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
Schmidt number, entanglement measures, entanglement quantification, quantum entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review