Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Open accessAbstract
Two separated observers, by applying local operations to a supply of not-too-impure entangled states (e.g., singlets shared through a noisy channel), can prepare a smaller number of entangled pairs of arbitrarily high purity (e.g., near-perfect singlets). These can then be used to faithfully teleport unknown quantum states from one observer to the other, thereby achieving faithful transmission of quantum information through a noisy channel. We give upper and lower bounds on the yield $D\left(M\right)$ of pure singlets $(|{\ensuremath{\Psi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}〉)$ distillable from mixed states $M$, showing $D\left(M\right)>0$ if $〈{\ensuremath{\Psi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}|M|{\ensuremath{\Psi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}〉>\frac{1}{2}$.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Two separated observers can purify noisy shared entanglement by local operations and classical communication, then use the purified pairs for faithful teleportation through noisy channels. The paper gives protocols showing distillable entanglement is nonzero for mixed states with singlet fidelity greater than \(1/2\), with upper and lower bounds on yield.
Key findings
- For a general mixed two-spin state \(M\), the distillable singlet yield satisfies \(D(M)>0\) if \(\langle \Psi^-|M|\Psi^-\rangle > 1/2\).
- Given two Werner pairs of fidelity \(F>1/2\), the recurrence protocol produces one Werner pair of fidelity \(F'>F\) with probability greater than \(1/4\).
- The breeding method has yield \(1-S(W)\), producing more pure pairs than consumed if the mixed state’s von Neumann entropy \(S(W)<1\); for Werner states this yield is positive for \(F>0.8107\).
- Werner states with \(F>1/2\) are regarded as nonlocal, even though only those with \(F>(2+3\sqrt{2})/8\approx0.78\) violate the CHSH inequality.
Methods
- Theoretical quantum-information protocol using local unitary operations, local measurements, and classical communication between Alice and Bob; no experimental data are reported.
- Random bilateral rotations symmetrize an arbitrary two-spin mixed state \(M\) into a Werner state \(W_F\) with the same fidelity \(F\), where \(F=1-3P_\parallel/2\).
- Purification uses bilateral XOR (BXOR) tests, unilateral Pauli rotations, bilateral \(\pi/2\) rotations, and \(z\)-axis measurements; analysis includes recurrence relations, entropy-counting arguments, and an upper bound from entanglement of formation.
Limitations
- The paper states that the optimal asymptotic yield \(D(M)\) is not known for general mixed states \(M\), nor even for Werner states, and that no \(M\) is known for which distillable entanglement and entanglement of formation provably differ.
- The recurrence method’s yield is “rather poor” and tends to zero as \(F_{\text{out}}\to1\); the breeding method requires prepurified \(\Phi^+\) pairs as targets and \(S(W)<1\).
- Evident from the text: the results are asymptotic and probabilistic, relying on large numbers of pairs and high-probability error location; no experimental implementation is presented.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
Asymptotically, S(W) BXOR tests per impure pair suffice to find all the errors.
“Combining these results, and recalling that log 2 ( N 1 N 2 ) = nS ( W ) + O ( √ n ), we obtain the desired result, viz. that asymptotically S ( W ) BXOR tests per impure pair suffice to find all the errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
By performing a number of BXOR tests on different subsets of the original impure pairs, all the Ψ states can be found and corrected to Φ states.
“By performing a number of BXOR tests, on different subsets of the original impure pairs, all the Ψ states can be found and corrected to Φ states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
For the choice k(F) ≈ 1/√(1-F), the expected fraction of pairs discarded at each step, to lowest order, is 2/3(1-F)^{1/2}.
“The expected fraction of the pairs discarded at each step, also to lowest order, is 2 3 (1 -F ) 1 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 2
A random bilateral rotation on each shared pair transforms any initial general two-spin mixed state M into a rotationally symmetric Werner state W_F of the same purity F.
“Because of the singlet's invariance under bilateral rotations, the symmetrized state W F , which we shall call a Werner state [7] of purity F , has the same F as the initial mixed state M from which it was derived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40 , 4277 (1989). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 2
The purity F of a two-spin mixed state relative to a perfect singlet can be computed from the probability P|| of obtaining parallel outcomes if the two spins are measured locally along the same random axis as F = 1 - 3P||/2.
“one finds that F = 1 -3 P ‖ / 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
Two separated observers can prepare a smaller number of entangled pairs of arbitrarily high purity from a supply of not-too-impure entangled states by local operations and classical communication.
“Two separated observers, by applying local operations to a supply of not-too-impure entangled states ( e.g. singlets shared through a noisy channel), can prepare a smaller number of entangled pairs of arbitrarily high purity ( e.g. nearperfect singlets).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
A similar procedure can find all the Φ- states and correct them to the desired Φ+.
“A similar procedure is then used to find all the Φ -states and correct them to the desired Φ + .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
For the choice k(F) ≈ 1/√(1-F), to lowest order in 1-F, the iteration formula for purity agrees with Eq. (7): F'(F) = 1 - 2/3(1-F).
“(For this choice of k , to lowest order in 1 -F , the iteration formula for purity agrees with Eq. (7): F ′ ( F ) = 1 -2 3 (1 -F ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
The yield D(M) of pure singlets distillable from mixed states M is positive if the fidelity 〈Ψ-|M|Ψ-〉 > 1/2.
“We give upper and lower bounds on the yield D ( M ) of pure singlets ( | Ψ -〉 ) distillable from mixed states M , showing D ( M ) > 0 if 〈 Ψ -| M | Ψ -〉 > 1 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
The number of BXOR tests per impure pair required to find all the errors, with arbitrarily small chance of failure, approaches the entropy S(W) = -Tr W log2 W in the limit of large n.
“The number of BXOR tests per impure pair required to find all the errors, with arbitrarily small chance of failure, approaches the entropy of the impure pairs, S ( W ) = -Tr W log 2 W , in the limit of large n .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The probability distribution P_X over n-bit strings x has a typical set containing N1 = 2^{H(X)+O(√n)} members, where H(X) is the Shannon entropy of P_X.
- Rests on an assumption: The conditional distribution P_{Y|X=x} of n-bit strings y has a typical set containing N2 = 2^{H(Y|X=x)+O(√n)} members.
- Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
A BXOR test tells Alice and Bob whether there are an even or odd number of Ψ states in the tested subset.
“Thus a BXOR test, like a parity check on classical data, tells Alice and Bob whether there are an even or odd number of Ψ states in the tested subset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4
For F ≤ 1/2, W_F can be expressed as a mixture of unentangled product states ↑↑, ↓↓, ↑↓, and ↓↑.
“while for F ≤ 1 2 , W F can be expressed as mixture of unentangled product states ↑↑ , ↓↓ , ↑↓ , and ↓↑ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4
For Werner states W_F, an upper bound on distillable entanglement is E(W_F) given by the formula in Eq. (9).
“Fig. 1 compares the yields of several purification methods for Werner states W F with an upper bound E ( W F ) given by”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
The noisy channel can be used to share entangled pairs for use in teleportation rather than to transmit the source states directly.
“We describe another approach, in which the noisy channel is not used to transmit the source states directly, but rather to share entangled pairs ( e.g. singlets) for use in teleportation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 2
For pure states, entanglement can be efficiently concentrated into singlets by local operations and classical communication, with yield m/n approaching E(Υ) as n→∞.
“For pure states, this entanglement can be efficiently concentrated into singlets by the methods of [6], which use local operations and classical communication to transform n input states Υ into m singlets with a yield m/n approaching E (Υ) as n → ∞ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] C.H. Bennett, H. Bernstein, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, 'Concentrating Partial Entanglement by Local Operations', submitted to Phys. Rev. A (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
For any two distinct n-bit strings, the probability that they agree on the parities of r independent random subsets of their bits is ≤ 2^{-r}.
“For any two distinct n -bit strings the probability that they agree on the parities of r independent random subsets of their bits is ≤ 2 -r [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, and U.M. Maurer, 'Generalized Privacy Amplification', to appear Nov. 1995 in IEEE Trans. on Information Theory .
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 2
Subsequent purification steps can be carried out without regard to any properties of the original mixed state M, or of the noisy channel(s) that may have generated it, except for the purity F.
“Therefore, subsequent steps in the purification can be carried out without regard to any properties of the original mixed state M , or of the noisy channel(s) that may have generated it, except for the purity F .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Two mixed states having the same density matrix are physically indistinguishable.
- Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 2
Given n shared singlets, local actions and classical communication suffice to prepare m arbitrarily good copies of Υ with yield m/n approaching 1/E(Υ) as n→∞.
“Conversely, given n shared singlets, local actions and classical communication suffice to prepare m arbitrarily good copies of Υ with a yield m/n approaching 1 /E (Υ) as n →∞ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] C.H. Bennett, H. Bernstein, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, 'Concentrating Partial Entanglement by Local Operations', submitted to Phys. Rev. A (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
Before entangled pairs can be used to teleport reliably, they must be purified from the mixed entangled states that result from transmission through the noisy channel.
“But before they can be used to teleport reliably, the entangled pairs must be purified-converted to almost-perfectly entangled states from the mixed entangled states that result from transmission through the noisy channel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3
Even without prepurified pairs, using only impure Bell-diagonal states W as input, it is possible to design a sequence of BXORs and local rotations that eliminate approximately half the candidates for x or y at each step, achieving the same asymptotic yield 1 - S(W) as the breeding method.
“Even without the prepurified pairs, using only impure Bell-diagonal states W as input, it is possible [11] to design a sequence of BXORs and local rotations that eliminate approximately half the candidates for x or y at each step, achieving the same asymptotic yield 1 -S ( W ) as the breeding method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] C.H. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters 'Mixed State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correcting Codes', preprint (1995).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
The overall result is to simulate a noiseless quantum channel by a noisy one, supplemented by local actions and classical communication.
“The overall result is to simulate a noiseless quantum channel by a noisy one, supplemented by local actions and classical communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1
An arbitrary unknown qubit can be faithfully transmitted via a pair of maximally entangled qubits previously shared between sender and receiver and a 2-bit classical message.
“Using teleportation, an arbitrary unknown qubit can be faithfully transmitted via a pair of maximally-entangled qubits ( e.g. two spin1 2 particles in a pure singlet state) previously shared between sender and receiver, and a 2-bit classical message from the sender to the receiver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 , 1895 (1993). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4
Because expected entanglement cannot be increased by local actions and classical communication, a mixed state's distillable entanglement D(M) cannot exceed its entanglement of formation E(M).
“Because expected entanglement cannot be increased by local actions and classical communication [11], a mixed state's distillable entanglement D ( M ) cannot exceed its entanglement of formation E ( M ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] C.H. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters 'Mixed State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correcting Codes', preprint (1995).
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 6
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3The breeding method has a yield 1 - S(W), producing more pure pairs than consumed if the mixed state's von Neumann entropy S(W) is less than 1.
“The breeding method has a yield 1 -S ( W ), producing more pure pairs than consumed if the mixed state's von Neumann entropy, S ( W ), is less than 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3By BXORing a variable number k(F) ≈ 1/√(1-F) of source pairs into each target pair before measuring it, the yield of the recurrence method can be increased and made to approach a positive limit as F_out → 1.
“but by BXORing a variable number k ( F ) ≈ 1 / √ 1 -F of source pairs, rather than 1, into each target pair before measuring it, the yield can be increased and made to approach a positive limit as F out → 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4F = 1/2 is a threshold below which Werner states can be made from unentangled ingredients, and above which they can be used as a starting material to make pure singlets.
“We have seen that F = 1 2 is a threshold below which Werner states can be made from unentangled ingredients, and above which they can be used as a starting material to make pure singlets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone given§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4For F > 1/2, W_F can be expressed as an equal mixture of eight pure states each having entropy of entanglement equal to the right side of Eq. (9a).
“each having entropy of entanglement equal to the right side of eq. 9a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1Quantum information cannot be cloned.
“Since quantum information cannot be cloned [4]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] W.K. Wootters and W.H.Zurek, Nature 299 , 802 (1982). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1Quantum data compression allows quantum data to be transmitted with asymptotically perfect fidelity using a number of qubits asymptotically approaching the source's von Neumann entropy.
“quantum data compression [2,3] allows quantum data to be transmitted, with asymptotically perfect fidelity, using a number of 2-state quantum systems or qubits ( e.g. spin1 2 particles) asymptotically approaching the source's von Neumann entropy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 3The non-breeding protocol requires only one-way classical communication, allowing it to be used to protect quantum information from errors during storage as well as during transmission.
“This non-breeding protocol requires only oneway classical communication, allowing it to be used to protect quantum information from errors during storage (cf [5,11]) as well as during transmission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] P. Shor Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] C.H. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters 'Mixed State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correcting Codes', preprint (1995).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1The purified entangled pairs can be used to faithfully teleport unknown quantum states from one observer to the other, achieving faithful transmission of quantum information through a noisy channel.
“These can then be used to faithfully teleport unknown quantum states from one observer to the other, thereby achieving faithful transmission of quantum information through a noisy channel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 1Quantum error-correcting codes have been discovered that operate by embedding the quantum information to be protected in a subspace so oriented in a larger Hilbert space as to leak little or no information to the environment, within a given noise model.
“Nevertheless, quantum error-correcting codes have recently been discovered [5] which operate in a subtler way, essentially by embedding the quantum information to be protected in a subspace so oriented in a larger Hilbert space as to leak little or no information to the environment, within a given noise model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] P. Shor Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels · p. 4These are the least entangled ensembles realizing W_F; therefore E(W_F) may be viewed as the Werner state's entanglement of formation.
“In fact [11] these are the least entangled ensembles realizing W F ; therefore, E ( W F ) may be viewed as the Werner state's 'entanglement of formation'-the asymptotic number of singlets required to prepare one W F by local actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] C.H. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters 'Mixed State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correcting Codes', preprint (1995).
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Two mixed states having the same density matrix are physically indistinguishable.
“At this point it should be recalled that two mixed states having the same density matrix are physically indistinguishable, even though they may have had different preparations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The probability distribution P_X over n-bit strings x has a typical set containing N1 = 2^{H(X)+O(√n)} members, where H(X) is the Shannon entropy of P_X.
“The probability distribution P X over n -bit strings x , where x represents the original sequence of Φ / Ψ values of the impure pairs, receives almost all its weight from a set of 'typical' strings containing N 1 = 2 H ( X )+ O ( √ n ) members, where H ( X ) is the Shannon entropy of P X .”
The paper relies on this without support.
The conditional distribution P_{Y|X=x} of n-bit strings y has a typical set containing N2 = 2^{H(Y|X=x)+O(√n)} members.
“Similarly, the conditional distribution P Y | X = x of n -bit strings y , representing the + / -values of a sequence of impure pairs whose Φ / Ψsequence is x , receives almost all its weight from a set of typical strings containing N 2 = 2 H ( Y | X = x )+ O ( √ n ) members.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Measuring both spins in a given pair along the z spin axis reliably distinguishes Ψ states from Φ states, but cannot distinguish + from - states.
“measuring both spins in a given pair along the z spin axis. This reliably distinguishes Ψ states from Φ states, but cannot distinguish + from -states.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By using entanglement purification, it becomes possible to teleport the quantum state of a particle even if the available quantum channels are of very poor quality.
“Furthermore, by using entanglement purification [22] - a scheme of improving the quality of entanglement if it was degraded by decoherence during storage or transmission of the particles over noisy channels - it becomes possible to teleport the quantum state of a particle to some place, even if the available quantum channels are of very poor quality and thus sending the particle itself would very”
From Experimental quantum teleportation (1997) · cites this paper as [22]
Logical purification can be used to remove errors from injected states and is effective if the error of the injected state is less than 0.141.
“To remove errors from the injected states, logical purification can be used 27, 28 and is effective if the error of the injected state is less than 0 . 141 . 28”
From Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
To complete the Gmin gate set so that arbitrary quantum computations can be implemented, it suffices to add HAD and preparation of the state |π/8〉.
“To complete the G min gate set so that we can implement arbitrary quantum computations, it suffices to add HAD and preparation of the state | π/ 8 〉 = cos( π/ 8) | 0 〉 + sin( π/ 8) | 1 〉 . 26, 27”
From Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The stated σy correction reverses the Bell-state signs
MinorThe paper first states that σy maps Ψ± to Φ∓. Step B2 instead says it converts Ψ± respectively to Φ±.
“Once found, the Ψ ± are converted respectively to Φ ± by applying a unilateral σ y rotation to each of them.”
“σ y maps Ψ ± ↔ Φ ∓ .”
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · see citing works
Self-citationProposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573 · see citing works
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · see citing works
Self-citationScheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479 · see citing works
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062 · see citing works
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,051 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralized privacy amplification
Bennett, C. H., Gilles Brassard, A., Crépeau, C., & Maurer, U. M. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.476316 · Cited by 1,426 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum computational networks
Deutsch, D. E. (1989) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1989.0099 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Schumacher, B. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.2738 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Self-citationBell’s inequalities versus teleportation: What is nonlocality?
Popescu, S. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.797 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationA New Proof of the Quantum Noiseless Coding Theorem
Jozsa, R., & Schumacher, B. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552191 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472 · see citing works
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545 · see citing works
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272 · see citing works
Self-citationPolynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1999) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144598347011 · Cited by 3,904 · see citing works
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858 · see citing works
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481 · see citing works
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263 · see citing works
Self-citationEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
Self-citationGood quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead
Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 · Cited by 2,467 · see citing works
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401 · see citing works
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution
Liao, S.-K., Cai, W.-Q., Liu, W.-Y., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Ren, J.-G., Yin, J., Shen, Q., Cao, Y., Li, Z.-P., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23655 · Cited by 1,821 · see citing works
Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition
Osborne, T. J., & Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.032110 · Cited by 1,472 · see citing works
Experimental entanglement of four particles
Sackett, C. A., Kielpinski, D., King, B. E., Langer, C., Meyer, V., Myatt, C. J., Rowe, M., Turchette, Q. A., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005011 · Cited by 1,436 · see citing works
Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Russian Mathematical Surveys · doi:10.1070/rm1997v052n06abeh002155 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Theory of Quantum Information
Watrous, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316848142 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1996.0136 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound
Gottesman, D. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1862 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
Quantum computing with trapped ions
HAFFNER, H., ROOS, C., & BLATT, R. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Wilde, M. M. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139525343 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations
Nielsen, M. A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.436 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance
Kim, Y., Eddins, A., Anand, S., Wei, K. X., van den Berg, E., Rosenblatt, S., Nayfeh, H., Wu, Y., Zaletel, M., Temme, K., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.1888 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Quantum Error Correction and Orthogonal Geometry
Calderbank, A. R., Rains, E. M., Shor, P. W., & Sloane, N. J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.405 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Topological Quantum Distillation
Bombin, H., & Martin-Delgado, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.180501 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate
Poyatos, J. F., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.390 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Separability of Very Noisy Mixed States and Implications for NMR Quantum Computing
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., Jozsa, R., Linden, N., Popescu, S., & Schack, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1054 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning
Bruß, D., DiVincenzo, D. P., Ekert, A., Fuchs, C. A., Macchiavello, C., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2368 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>Colloquium</i>: Quantum networks with trapped ions
Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1209 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
High-threshold universal quantum computation on the surface code
Fowler, A. G., Stephens, A. M., & Groszkowski, P. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.052312 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Bound entanglement can be activated
Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1056 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Capacities of Quantum Erasure Channels
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., & Smolin, J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3217 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationProbabilistic error cancellation with sparse Pauli–Lindblad models on noisy quantum processors
van den Berg, E., Minev, Z. K., Kandala, A., & Temme, K. (2023) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02042-2 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Quantum-channel capacity of very noisy channels
DiVincenzo, D. P., Shor, P. W., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.830 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationClassification of multiqubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties
Dür, W., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042314 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Linear Optics Controlled-Phase Gate Made Simple
Kiesel, N., Schmid, C., Weber, U., Ursin, R., & Weinfurter, H. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210505 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Separability and Distillability of Multiparticle Quantum Systems
Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Tarrach, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3562 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Quantum Error Correction with Imperfect Gates
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5923-8_19 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices
Koczor, B. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031057 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Perseguers, S., Lewenstein, M., Acín, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1665 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Quantum communication for wireless wide-area networks
Cheng, S.-T., Wang, C.-Y., & Tao, M.-H. (2005) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2005.851157 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Irreversibility in Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement
Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5803 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and negativity
Miranowicz, A., & Grudka, A. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/12/009 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Transfer of nonclassical features in quantum teleportation via a mixed quantum channel
Lee, J., Kim, M. S., & Jeong, H. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.032305 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
All entangled states display some hidden nonlocality
Liang, Y.-C., Masanes, L., & Rosset, D. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052115 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Quantum repeaters based on trapped ions with decoherence-free subspace encoding
Zwerger, M., Lanyon, B. P., Northup, T. E., Muschik, C. A., Dür, W., & Sangouard, N. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa7983 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Quantum error mitigation by Pauli check sandwiching
Gonzales, A., Shaydulin, R., Saleem, Z. H., & Suchara, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28109-x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Kenyon College (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Williams College (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-01-29
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 722-725
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2062258079
- Semantic Scholar
- e44193a72ea571878bc157e61a95a9e1dc218dae
- Cited by
- 2,961
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 119 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 66.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Kenyon (Kenyon College) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- entanglement distillation, quantum teleportation, noisy channels, singlet state, mixed states, quantum information transfer, local operations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review