Cited by 9532D Materials and ApplicationsPhotonic and Optical DevicesGraphene research and applications

Waveguide-integrated black phosphorus photodetector with high responsivity and low dark current

Open access
Youngblood, Nathan, Chen, Che, Koester, Steven J., Li, Mo·2015·Nature Photonics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2015.23

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Youngblood, N., Chen, C., Koester, S. J., & Li, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Mo
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2015-03-02
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
247-252
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2086891800
Cited by
953
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 30
FWCI
44.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
black phosphorus, photodetectors, silicon waveguides, dark current, responsivity, two-dimensional materials, photovoltaic effect, response bandwidth, graphene comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review