The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent control of three-spin states in a triple quantum dot
Open accessAbstract
Manipulating the electrons trapped in quantum-dot pairs is one possible route to quantum computation. Translating this idea to three quantum dots would enable a whole host of extended functionality. Researchers now generate and manipulate coherent superpositions of quantum states using the spins across three electrical-gate-defined dots. Spin qubits involving individual spins in single quantum dots or coupled spins in double quantum dots have emerged as potential building blocks for quantum information processing applications1,2,3,4. It has been suggested that triple quantum dots may provide additional tools and functionalities. These include encoding information either to obtain protection from decoherence or to permit all-electrical operation5, efficient spin busing across a quantum circuit6, and to enable quantum error correction using the three-spin Greenberger-Horn-Zeilinger quantum state. Towards these goals we demonstrate coherent manipulation of two interacting three-spin states. We employ the Landau–Zener–Stückelberg7,8 approach for creating and manipulating coherent superpositions of quantum states9. We confirm that we are able to maintain coherence when decreasing the exchange coupling of one spin with another while simultaneously increasing its coupling with the third. Such control of pairwise exchange is a requirement of most spin qubit architectures10, but has not been previously demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels
Zener, C. (1932) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0165 · Cited by 4,572 · cited 6×
“[5] Shevchenko, S., Ashhab, S. and Nori, F. Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry.”
MethodInfluentialCoherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Taylor, J. M., Laird, E. A., Yacoby, A., Lukin, M. D., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116955 · Cited by 3,183
Spins in few-electron quantum dots
Hanson, R., Kouwenhoven, L. P., Petta, J. R., Tarucha, S., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.1217 · Cited by 2,665
Driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot
Koppens, F. H. L., Buizert, C., Tielrooij, K. J., Vink, I. T., Nowack, K. C., Meunier, T., Kouwenhoven, L. P., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05065 · Cited by 1,359
Universal quantum computation with the exchange interaction
DiVincenzo, D. P., Bacon, D., Kempe, J., Burkard, G., & Whaley, K. B. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042541 · Cited by 924
Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interferometry
Shevchenko, S. N., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.002 · Cited by 821
Current Rectification by Pauli Exclusion in a Weakly Coupled Double Quantum Dot System
Ono, K., Austing, D. G., Tokura, Y., & Tarucha, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070958 · Cited by 801
Measurements of Coulomb blockade with a noninvasive voltage probe
Field, M., Smith, C. G., Pepper, M., Ritchie, D. A., Frost, J. E. F., Jones, G. A. C., & Hasko, D. G. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1311 · Cited by 613
Electrically driven single-electron spin resonance in a slanting Zeeman field
Pioro-Ladrière, M., Obata, T., Tokura, Y., Shin, Y.-S., Kubo, T., Yoshida, K., Taniyama, T., & Tarucha, S. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1053 · Cited by 600
Self-citationFew-electron quantum dot circuit with integrated charge read out
Elzerman, J. M., Hanson, R., Greidanus, J. S., Willems van Beveren, L. H., De Franceschi, S., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Tarucha, S., & Kouwenhoven, L. P. (2003) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.161308 · Cited by 433
Addition spectrum of a lateral dot from Coulomb and spin-blockade spectroscopy
Ciorga, M., Sachrajda, A. S., Hawrylak, P., Gould, C., Zawadzki, P., Jullian, S., Feng, Y., & Wasilewski, Z. (2000) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.r16315 · Cited by 417
Self-citationRelaxation, dephasing, and quantum control of electron spins in double quantum dots
Taylor, J. M., Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Yacoby, A., Marcus, C. M., & Lukin, M. D. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.035315 · Cited by 356
Coherent electronic transfer in quantum dot systems using adiabatic passage
Greentree, A. D., Cole, J. H., Hamilton, A. R., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.235317 · Cited by 283
A Coherent Beam Splitter for Electronic Spin States
Petta, J. R., Lu, H., & Gossard, A. C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183628 · Cited by 258
Coherent spin manipulation in an exchange-only qubit
Laird, E. A., Taylor, J. M., DiVincenzo, D. P., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.075403 · Cited by 241
Three-dimensional transport diagram of a triple quantum dot
Granger, G., Gaudreau, L., Kam, A., Pioro-Ladrière, M., Studenikin, S., Wasilewski, Z. R., Zawadzki, P., & Sachrajda, A. S. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.075304 · Cited by 82
Self-citationHarnessing the GaAs quantum dot nuclear spin bath for quantum control
Ribeiro, H., Petta, J. R., & Burkard, G. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.115445 · Cited by 44
Baugh, J., Moussa, O., Ryan, C. A., Laflamme, R., Ramanathan, C., Havel, T. F., & Cory, D. G. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022305 · Cited by 43
Nuclear dynamics during Landau-Zener singlet-triplet transitions in double quantum dots
Brataas, A., & RASHBA, E. I. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.045301 · Cited by 24
Universal Quantum-ComputationPreprint
Bishnoi, B. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3890635 · Cited by 3
Cited by
Prospects for Spin-Based Quantum Computing in Quantum Dots
Kloeffel, C., & Loss, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-184248 · Cited by 411
Charge Noise Spectroscopy Using Coherent Exchange Oscillations in a Singlet-Triplet Qubit
Dial, O. E., Shulman, M. D., Harvey, S. P., Bluhm, H., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.146804 · Cited by 345
Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quantum dot hybrid qubit
Kim, D., Shi, Z., Simmons, C. B., Ward, D. R., Prance, J. R., Koh, T. S., Gamble, J. K., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Friesen, M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13407 · Cited by 291
Strong electron-electron interactions in Si/SiGe quantum dots
Ercan, H. E., Coppersmith, S. N., & Friesen, M. (2021) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.235302 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaudreau, L., Granger, G., Kam, A., Aers, G. C., Studenikin, S. A., Zawadzki, P., Pioro-Ladrière, M., Wasilewski, Z. R., & Sachrajda, A. S.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2011-11-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-58
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1976527689
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
