Cited by 33Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Timekeepers of the future

Margolis, Helen·2014·Nature Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys2834

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The work clears the path towards a redefinition of the SI second through regular and practical international comparisons of optical clocks.

    “Our work not only enables the above mentioned applications, but also clears the path towards a redefinition of the unit of time, the SI second2425 through regular and practical international comparisons of optical clocks.”

    From A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

  • EGG2015 is the latest European gravimetric quasigeoid model; its major differences from EGG2008 are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements around major European optical clock sites within the ITOC project and the use of a newer GOCE-based geopotential model instead of EGM2008.

    “The major differences between EGG2015 and the previous EGG2008 model (Denker 2013) are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements carried out recently around all major European optical clock sites within the ITOC project (Margolis et al. 2013; Margolis 2014; see also http://projects. npl.co.uk/itoc/) and the use of a newer geopotential model based on the GOCE satellite mission instead of EGM”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Margolis, H.
Affiliations
National Physical Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Margolis, Helen
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2014-01-12
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
82-83
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W1964129492
Cited by
33
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Association of National Metrology Institutes
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
optical atomic clocks, redefinition of the second, timekeeping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review